Characterization of trees with equal 2-domination number and domination number plus two

2011 ◽  
Vol 31 (4) ◽  
pp. 687
Author(s):  
Mustapha Chellali ◽  
Lutz Volkmann
Keyword(s):  
Domination Number

scholarly journals Commuting decomposition of Kn1,n2,...,nk through realization of the product A(G)A(GPk )

2018 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
pp. 343-356
Author(s):  
K. Arathi Bhat ◽  
G. Sudhakara
Keyword(s):  
Chromatic Number ◽  
Perfect Matching ◽  
Domination Number ◽  
Perfect Matchings ◽  
Factor Graph ◽  
Vertex Set ◽  
Graph Parameters

Abstract In this paper, we introduce the notion of perfect matching property for a k-partition of vertex set of given graph. We consider nontrivial graphs G and GPk , the k-complement of graph G with respect to a kpartition of V(G), to prove that A(G)A(GPk ) is realizable as a graph if and only if P satis_es perfect matching property. For A(G)A(GPk ) = A(Γ) for some graph Γ, we obtain graph parameters such as chromatic number, domination number etc., for those graphs and characterization of P is given for which GPk and Γ are isomorphic. Given a 1-factor graph G with 2n vertices, we propose a partition P for which GPk is a graph of rank r and A(G)A(GPk ) is graphical, where n ≤ r ≤ 2n. Motivated by the result of characterizing decomposable Kn,n into commuting perfect matchings [2], we characterize complete k-partite graph Kn1,n2,...,nk which has a commuting decomposition into a perfect matching and its k-complement.

Edge lifting and Roman domination in graphs

2020 ◽  
pp. 2150064
Author(s):  
Hicham Meraimi ◽  
Mustapha Chellali
Keyword(s):  
Domination Number ◽  
Roman Domination ◽  
Roman Domination Number ◽  
Induced Path ◽  
Domination In Graphs

Let [Formula: see text] be a graph, and let [Formula: see text] be an induced path centered at [Formula: see text]. An edge lift defined on [Formula: see text] is the action of removing edges [Formula: see text] and [Formula: see text] while adding the edge [Formula: see text] to the edge set of [Formula: see text]. In this paper, we initiate the study of the effects of edge lifting on the Roman domination number of a graph, where various properties are established. A characterization of all trees for which every edge lift increases the Roman domination number is provided. Moreover, we characterize the edge lift of a graph decreasing the Roman domination number, and we show that there are no graphs with at most one cycle for which every possible edge lift can have this property.

scholarly journals Graphs with Constant Sum of Domination and Inverse Domination Numbers

2012 ◽  
Vol 2012 ◽  
pp. 1-7 ◽  
Author(s):  
T. Tamizh Chelvam ◽  
T. Asir
Keyword(s):  
Minimum Degree ◽  
Dominating Set ◽  
Domination Number ◽  
Complete Characterization ◽  
Dominating Sets ◽  
Minimum Cardinality ◽  
Connected Graphs ◽  
Vertex Set ◽  
Domination Numbers

A subset D of the vertex set of a graph G, is a dominating set if every vertex in V−D is adjacent to at least one vertex in D. The domination number γ(G) is the minimum cardinality of a dominating set of G. A subset of V−D, which is also a dominating set of G is called an inverse dominating set of G with respect to D. The inverse domination number γ′(G) is the minimum cardinality of the inverse dominating sets. Domke et al. (2004) characterized connected graphs G with γ(G)+γ′(G)=n, where n is the number of vertices in G. It is the purpose of this paper to give a complete characterization of graphs G with minimum degree at least two and γ(G)+γ′(G)=n−1.

scholarly journals Almost well-dominated bipartite graphs with minimum degree at least two

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hadi Alizadeh ◽  
Didem Gözüpek
Keyword(s):  
Minimum Degree ◽  
Dominating Set ◽  
Domination Number ◽  
Bipartite Graphs ◽  
Maximum Cardinality ◽  
Minimum Cardinality ◽  
Upper Domination Number ◽  
The Difference ◽  
Two Parameters

A dominating set in a graph $G=(V,E)$ is a set $S$ such that every vertex of $G$ is either in $S$ or adjacent to a vertex in $S$. While the minimum cardinality of a dominating set in $G$ is called the domination number of $G$ denoted by $\gamma(G)$, the maximum cardinality of a minimal dominating set in $G$ is called the upper domination number of $G$ denoted by $\Gamma(G)$. We call the difference between these two parameters the \textit{domination gap} of $G$ and denote it by $\mu_d(G) = \Gamma(G) - \gamma(G)$. While a graph $G$ with $\mu_d(G)=0$ is said to be a \textit{well-dominated} graph, we call a graph $G$ with $\mu_d(G)=1$ an \textit{almost well-dominated} graph. In this work, we first establish an upper bound for the cardinality of bipartite graphs with $\mu_d(G)=k$, where $k\geq1$, and minimum degree at least two. We then provide a complete structural characterization of almost well-dominated bipartite graphs with minimum degree at least two. While the results by Finbow et al.~\cite{domination} imply that a 4-cycle is the only well-dominated bipartite graph with minimum degree at least two, we prove in this paper that there exist precisely 31 almost well-dominated bipartite graphs with minimum degree at least two.

scholarly journals Upper paired domination versus upper domination

2021 ◽  
Vol vol. 23, no. 3 (Graph Theory) ◽  
Author(s):  
Hadi Alizadeh ◽  
Didem Gözüpek
Keyword(s):  
Perfect Matching ◽  
Dominating Set ◽  
Domination Number ◽  
Graph Classes ◽  
Paired Domination Number ◽  
Upper Domination Number ◽  
Paired Domination ◽  
Cactus Graphs ◽  
Open Question

A paired dominating set $P$ is a dominating set with the additional property that $P$ has a perfect matching. While the maximum cardainality of a minimal dominating set in a graph $G$ is called the upper domination number of $G$, denoted by $\Gamma(G)$, the maximum cardinality of a minimal paired dominating set in $G$ is called the upper paired domination number of $G$, denoted by $\Gamma_{pr}(G)$. By Henning and Pradhan (2019), we know that $\Gamma_{pr}(G)\leq 2\Gamma(G)$ for any graph $G$ without isolated vertices. We focus on the graphs satisfying the equality $\Gamma_{pr}(G)= 2\Gamma(G)$. We give characterizations for two special graph classes: bipartite and unicyclic graphs with $\Gamma_{pr}(G)= 2\Gamma(G)$ by using the results of Ulatowski (2015). Besides, we study the graphs with $\Gamma_{pr}(G)= 2\Gamma(G)$ and a restricted girth. In this context, we provide two characterizations: one for graphs with $\Gamma_{pr}(G)= 2\Gamma(G)$ and girth at least 6 and the other for $C_3$-free cactus graphs with $\Gamma_{pr}(G)= 2\Gamma(G)$. We also pose the characterization of the general case of $C_3$-free graphs with $\Gamma_{pr}(G)= 2\Gamma(G)$ as an open question.

scholarly journals A characterization of hypergraphs with large domination number

2016 ◽  
Vol 36 (2) ◽  
pp. 427 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael .A. Henning ◽  
Christian Löwenstein
Keyword(s):  
Domination Number

scholarly journals Strong equality of Roman and perfect Roman domination in trees

2022 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zehui Shao ◽  
Saeed Kosari ◽  
Hadi Rahbani ◽  
Mehdi Sharifzadeh ◽  
Seyed Mahmoud Sheikholeslami
Keyword(s):  
Minimum Weight ◽  
Domination Number ◽  
Np Hard ◽  
Roman Domination ◽  
Roman Domination Number ◽  
Roman Dominating Function ◽  
Dominating Function

A Roman dominating function (RD-function) on a graph $G = (V, E)$ is a function $f: V \longrightarrow \{0, 1, 2\}$ satisfying the condition that every vertex $u$ for which $f(u) = 0$ is adjacent to at least one vertex $v$ for which $f(v) = 2$. An Roman dominating function $f$ in a graph $G$ is perfect Roman dominating function (PRD-function) if  every vertex $u$ with $f(u) = 0$ is adjacent to exactly one vertex  $v$ for which $f(v) = 2$. The (perfect) Roman domination number $\gamma_R(G)$ ($\gamma_{R}^{p}(G)$) is the minimum weight of an (perfect) Roman dominating function on $G$.  We say that $\gamma_{R}^{p}(G)$ strongly equals $\gamma_R(G)$, denoted by $\gamma_{R}^{p}(G)\equiv \gamma_R(G)$, if every RD-function on $G$ of minimum weight is a PRD-function. In this paper we  show that for a given graph $G$, it is NP-hard to decide whether $\gamma_{R}^{p}(G)= \gamma_R(G)$ and also we provide a constructive characterization of trees $T$ with $\gamma_{R}^{p}(T)\equiv \gamma_R(T)$.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document