scholarly journals Eigen model of randomness in species evolution

2014 ◽  
Vol 63 (10) ◽  
pp. 108701
Author(s):  
Qiao Li-Hua ◽  
Zhao Tong-Jun ◽  
Gu Jian-Zhong ◽  
Zhuo Yi-Zhong
Lab on a Chip ◽  
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xinne Zhao ◽  
Rico Illing ◽  
Philip Ruelens ◽  
Michael Bachmann ◽  
Gianaurelio Cuniberti ◽  
...  

Understanding competition and cooperation within microbiota is of high fundamental and clinical importance, helping to comprehend species’ evolution and biodiversity. We co-encapsulated and cultured two isogenic Escherichia coli strains expressing...


Mammalia ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 0 (0) ◽  
Author(s):  
Ying Jiang ◽  
Jia Yu Wang ◽  
Xiao Fu Huang ◽  
Chun Lan Mai ◽  
Wen Bo Liao

Abstract Brain size exhibits significant changes within and between species. Evolution of large brains can be explained by the need to improve cognitive ability for processing more information in changing environments. However, brains are among the most energetically expensive organs. Enlarged brains can impose energetic demands that limit brain size evolution. The expensive tissue hypothesis (ETH) states that a decrease in the size of another expensive tissue, such as the gut, should compensate for the cost of a large brain. We studied the interplay between energetic limitations and brain size evolution in small mammals using phylogenetically generalized least squares (PGLS) regression analysis. Brain mass was not correlated with the length of the digestive tract in 37 species of small mammals after correcting for phylogenetic relationships and body size effects. We further found that the evolution of a large brain was not accompanied by a decrease in male reproductive investments into testes mass and in female reproductive investment into offspring number. The evolution of brain size in small mammals is inconsistent with the prediction of the ETH.


2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eric Lewitus ◽  
Hélène Morlon

AbstractUnderstanding the relative influence of various abiotic and biotic variables on diversification dynamics is a major goal of macroevolutionary studies. Recently, phylogenetic approaches have been developed that make it possible to estimate the role of various environmental variables on diversification using time-calibrated species trees, paleoenvironmental data, and maximum-likelihood techniques. These approaches have been effectively employed to estimate how speciation and extinction rates vary with key abiotic variables, such as temperature and sea level, and we can anticipate that they will be increasingly used in the future. Here we compile a series of biotic and abiotic paleodatasets that can be used as explanatory variables in these models and use simulations to assess the statistical properties of the approach when applied to these paleodatasets. We demonstrate that environment-dependent models perform well in recovering environment-dependent speciation and extinction parameters, as well as in correctly identifying the simulated environmental model when speciation isenvironment-dependent. We explore how the strength of the environment-dependency, tree size, missing taxa, and characteristics of the paleoenvironmental curves influence the performance of the models. Finally, using these models, we infer environment-dependent diversification in three empirical phylogenies: temperature-dependence in Cetacea,δ13C-dependence in Ruminantia, andCO2-dependence in Portulacaceae. We illustrate how to evaluate the relative importance of abiotic and biotic variables in these three clades and interpret these results in light of macroevolutionary hypotheses for mammals and plants. Given the important role paleoenvironments are presumed to have played in species evolution, our statistical assessment of how environment-dependent models behave is crucial for their utility in macroevolutionary analysis.


1992 ◽  
Vol 36 (1) ◽  
pp. 39-48 ◽  
Author(s):  
Uwe Br�ndle ◽  
Hideki Ono ◽  
Vladimir Vincek ◽  
Dagmar Klein ◽  
Mladen Golubic ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document