Specialist palliative care teams hailed for training role

2017 ◽  
Vol 29 (7) ◽  
pp. 6-6
Author(s):  
Chris Longhurst
Keyword(s):  
Palliative Care ◽  
Specialist Palliative Care ◽  
Palliative Care Teams

scholarly journals Shared electronic care coordination systems following referral to hospice

2021 ◽  
Vol 26 (2) ◽  
pp. 58-62
Author(s):  
Libby Sampey ◽  
Anne M Finucane ◽  
Juliet Spiller
Keyword(s):  
Palliative Care ◽  
Service Evaluation ◽  
Health Providers ◽  
Specialist Palliative Care ◽  
Community Nurse ◽  
Structured Interviews ◽  
Out Of Hours ◽  
Care Community ◽  
Palliative Care Teams ◽  
Coordination Systems

In Scotland, the Key Information Summary (KIS) enables health providers to access key patient information to guide decision-making out-of-hours. KISs are generated in primary care and rely on information from other teams, such as community specialist palliative care teams (CSPCTs), to keep them up-to-date. This study involved a service evaluation consisting of case note reviews of new referrals to a CSPCT and semi-structured interviews with palliative care community nurse specialists (CNSs) regarding their perspectives on KISs. Some 44 case notes were examined, and 77% of patients had a KIS on CSPCT referral. One-month post-referral, all those re-examined (n=17) had a KIS, and 59% KISs had been updated following CNS assessments. CNSs cited anticipatory care planning (ACP) as the most useful aspect of KIS, and the majority of CNSs said they would appreciate KIS editing access. A system allowing CNSs to update KISs would be acceptable to CNSs, as it could facilitate care co-ordination and potentially improve comprehensiveness of ACP information held in KISs.

Acute palliative intervention: critical care outreach and hospital specialist palliative care teams collaboration

2020 ◽  
pp. bmjspcare-2019-002065
Author(s):  
Felicity Dewhurst ◽  
Alex Nicholson ◽  
Lindsay Garcia ◽  
Isabel Gonzalez ◽  
Martin Johnson ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Palliative Care ◽  
Critical Care ◽  
Specialist Palliative Care ◽  
Hospital Specialist ◽  
Palliative Care Teams ◽  
Critical Care Outreach

The Effect of Community-Based Specialist Palliative Care Teams on Place of Care

2016 ◽  
Vol 19 (1) ◽  
pp. 16-21 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hsien Seow ◽  
Gagan Dhaliwal ◽  
Konrad Fassbender ◽  
Jagadish Rangrej ◽  
Kevin Brazil ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Palliative Care ◽  
Specialist Palliative Care ◽  
Community Based ◽  
Palliative Care Teams

scholarly journals ‘Necessity is the mother of invention’: Specialist palliative care service innovation and practice change in response to COVID-19. Results from a multi-national survey (CovPall)

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lesley Dunleavy ◽  
Nancy Preston ◽  
Sabrina Bajwah ◽  
Andy Bradshaw ◽  
Rachel Cripps ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Palliative Care ◽  
Resource Use ◽  
System Response ◽  
List Type ◽  
Specialist Palliative Care ◽  
It Infrastructure ◽  
Care Services ◽  
Palliative Care Teams ◽  
Palliative Care Services ◽  
Palliative Care Units

AbstractBackgroundSpecialist palliative care services have a key role in a whole system response to COVID-19. There is a need to understand service response to share good practice and prepare for future care.AimTo map and understand specialist palliative care services innovations and practice changes in response to COVID-19 (CovPall).DesignOnline survey of specialist palliative care providers, disseminated via key stakeholders. Data collected on service characteristics, innovations and changes in response to COVID-19. Statistical analysis included frequencies, proportions and means, and free-text comments were analysed using a qualitative framework approach.Setting/participantsInpatient palliative care units, home nursing services, hospital and home palliative care teams from any country.Results458 respondents: 277 UK, 85 Europe (except UK), 95 World (except UK and Europe), 1 missing country. 54.8% provided care across 2+ settings; 47.4% hospital palliative care teams, 57% in-patient palliative care units, and 57% home palliative care teams. The crisis context meant services implemented rapid changes. Changes involved streamlining, extending and increasing outreach of services, using technology to facilitate communication, and implementing staff wellbeing innovations. Barriers included; fear and anxiety, duplication of effort, information overload, funding, and IT infrastructure issues. Enablers included; collaborative teamwork, pooling of staffing resources, staff flexibility, a pre-existing IT infrastructure and strong leadership.ConclusionsSpecialist palliative care services have been flexible, highly adaptive and have adopted a ‘frugal innovation’ model in response to COVID-19. In addition to financial support, greater collaboration is essential to minimise duplication of effort and optimise resource use.ISRCTN16561225https://doi.org/10.1186/ISRCTN16561225Key StatementsWhat is already known about the topic?Specialist palliative care is part of a whole healthcare system response to COVID-19.Services need to make practice changes in response to the global pandemic.What this paper addsSpecialist palliative care services responded rapidly to COVID-19 in both planning for change and then adapting to needs and requirements.Services often relied on ‘improvisation’, ‘quick fixes’ and ‘making do’ when responding to the COVID-19 crisis.Implications for practice, theory or policyIn addition to financial support, greater collaboration is essential to build organisational resilience and drive forward innovation, by minimising duplication of effort and optimising resource use.The effectiveness and sustainability of any changes made during the crisis needs further evaluation.

Retrospective assessment of quality of cancer care in last 6 months of life.

2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (34_suppl) ◽  
pp. 234-234
Author(s):  
Brian Cassel ◽  
Nevena Skoro ◽  
Kathleen Kerr ◽  
Lisa Shickle ◽  
Patrick J. Coyne ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Palliative Care ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Cancer Care ◽  
Specialist Palliative Care ◽  
Retrospective Assessment ◽  
Palliative Care Teams ◽  
Social Security Death Index ◽  
National Quality ◽  
National Organizations

234 Background: National organizations such as the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) and the National Quality Forum (NQF) have developed metrics that assess the quality of cancer care. These metrics include consensus standards by the NQF for management of symptoms and end-of-life-care. Cancer centers need feasible methods for self-evaluating their performance on such metrics. Methods: Claims for our cancer patients were matched to Social Security Death Index data to determine date of death.3,128 adult cancer patients died between January 2009 and July 2011 and had at least 1 contact with our center in their last six month of life. All inpatient and outpatient claims data generated in the last six months of life at our hospital were analyzed. Results: 32% of patients had an admission in their last 30 days of life, with 15% dying in the hospital. 19% had at least one 30-day readmission in their last six months of life. 6.7% had chemotherapy in the 2 weeks prior to death, and 11.4% in the last month. 27.5% had some contact with the specialist palliative care (SPC) team. Solid tumor patients with SPC earlier than 1 month until death had fewer in-hospital deaths (15.6%) versus those with later or no SPC (19.5%), p=.041. There was no SPC difference for 30-day mortality, or 14- or 30-day chemotherapy metrics. Conclusions: Hospitals can self-evaluate their own performance on NQF endorsed measures, and CMS outcome measures. These data provide additional impetus for earlier integration of specialist palliative care teams. SPC in the last 1-3 weeks of life did not improve most utilization metrics.[Table: see text]

scholarly journals ‘Necessity is the mother of invention’: Specialist palliative care service innovation and practice change in response to COVID-19. Results from a multinational survey (CovPall)

2021 ◽  
pp. 026921632110006
Author(s):  
Lesley Dunleavy ◽  
Nancy Preston ◽  
Sabrina Bajwah ◽  
Andy Bradshaw ◽  
Rachel Cripps ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Palliative Care ◽  
Good Practice ◽  
System Response ◽  
Free Text ◽  
Care Providers ◽  
Specialist Palliative Care ◽  
Care Services ◽  
Palliative Care Teams ◽  
Palliative Care Services ◽  
Palliative Care Units

Background: Specialist palliative care services have a key role in a whole system response to COVID-19, a disease caused by the SARS-CoV-2 virus. There is a need to understand service response to share good practice and prepare for future care. Aim: To map and understand specialist palliative care services innovations and practice changes in response to COVID-19. Design: Online survey of specialist palliative care providers (CovPall), disseminated via key stakeholders. Data collected on service characteristics, innovations and changes in response to COVID-19. Statistical analysis included frequencies, proportions and means, and free-text comments were analysed using a qualitative framework approach. Setting/participants: Inpatient palliative care units, home nursing services, hospital and home palliative care teams from any country. Results: Four hundred and fifty-eight respondents: 277 UK, 85 Europe (except UK), 95 World (except UK and Europe), 1 missing country. 54.8% provided care across 2+ settings; 47.4% hospital palliative care teams, 57% in-patient palliative care units and 57% home palliative care teams. The crisis context meant services implemented rapid changes. Changes involved streamlining, extending and increasing outreach of services, using technology to facilitate communication, and implementing staff wellbeing innovations. Barriers included; fear and anxiety, duplication of effort, information overload and funding. Enablers included; collaborative teamwork, staff flexibility, a pre-existing IT infrastructure and strong leadership. Conclusions: Specialist palliative care services have been flexible, highly adaptive and have adopted low-cost solutions, also called ‘frugal innovations’, in response to COVID-19. In addition to financial support, greater collaboration is essential to minimise duplication of effort and optimise resource use. ISRCTN16561225 https://doi.org/10.1186/ISRCTN16561225

scholarly journals Specialist palliative care teams and characteristics related to referral rate: a national cross-sectional survey among hospitals in the Netherlands

2021 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
M.S. Boddaert ◽  
A. Stoppelenburg ◽  
J. Hasselaar ◽  
Y.M. van der Linden ◽  
K.C.P. Vissers ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Palliative Care ◽  
The Netherlands ◽  
Referral Rate ◽  
Outpatient Clinics ◽  
Specialist Palliative Care ◽  
Cross Sectional Survey ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Referral Rates ◽  
Palliative Care Teams ◽  
Education Participation

Abstract Background Specialist palliative care teams (SPCTs) in hospitals improve quality of life and satisfaction with care for patients with advanced disease. However, referrals to SPCTs are often limited. To identify areas for improvement of SPCTs’ service penetration, we explored the characteristics and level of integration of palliative care programmes and SPCTs in Dutch hospitals and we assessed the relation between these characteristics and specialist palliative care referral rates. Methods We performed a secondary analysis of a national cross-sectional survey conducted among hospitals in the Netherlands from March through May 2018. For this survey, a previously developed online questionnaire, containing 6 consensus-based integration indicators, was sent to palliative care programme leaders in all 78 hospitals. For referral rate we calculated the number of annual inpatient referrals to the SPCT as a percentage of the number of total annual hospital admissions. Referral rate was dichotomized into high (≥ third quartile) and low (< third quartile). Characteristics of SPCTs with high and low referral rate were compared using univariate analyses. P-values < 0.05 were considered significant. Results In total, 63 hospitals (81%) participated in the survey, of which 62 had an operational SPCT. The palliative care programmes of these hospitals consisted of inpatient consultation services (94%), interdisciplinary staffing (61%), outpatient clinics (45%), dedicated acute care beds (21%) and community-based palliative care (27%). The median referral rate was 0.56% (IQR 0.23–1.0%), ranging from 0 to 3.7%. Comparing SPCTs with high referral rate (≥1%, n = 17) and low referral rate (< 1%, n = 45) showed significant differences for SPCTs’ years of existence, staffing, their level of education, participation in other departments’ team meetings, provision of education and conducting research. With regard to integration, significant differences were found for the presence of outpatient clinics and timing of referrals. Conclusion In the Netherlands, palliative care programmes and specialist palliative care teams in hospitals vary in their level of integration and development, with more mature teams showing higher referral rates. Appropriate staffing, dedicated outpatient clinics, education and research appear means to improve service penetration and timing of referral for patients with advanced diseases.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document