scholarly journals Retrospective Comparative Analysis of Fluoroscopic-Guided Lumbar Puncture in the Routine Prone Versus Lateral Decubitus Position

Cureus ◽  
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dmitriy Bakrukov ◽  
Zaid Siddique ◽  
Rajiv Mangla ◽  
Amar Swarnkar
Keyword(s):  
Comparative Analysis ◽  
Lumbar Puncture ◽  
Lateral Decubitus Position ◽  
Lateral Decubitus

Effectiveness of Lateral Decubitus Position for Preventing Post-Dural Puncture Headache: A Meta-Analysis

2017 ◽  
Vol 4 (20;4) ◽  
pp. E521-E529 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andres Zorrilla-Vaca
Keyword(s):  
Spinal Anesthesia ◽  
Lumbar Puncture ◽  
Dural Puncture ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Lateral Decubitus Position ◽  
Cochrane Library ◽  
Sitting Position ◽  
Post Dural Puncture Headache ◽  
Lateral Decubitus ◽  
The Impact

Background: Post-dural puncture headache (PDPH) is a relatively common complication of lumbar punctures for spinal anesthesia or neurologic diagnosis. For many years, a high number of drugs has been evaluated to treat PDPH, yet there is a minority to prevent this complication. The lateral decubitus position instead of sitting position during lumbar puncture has become an interesting approach because of its feasibility and patient satisfaction. Objectives: In this meta-analysis we hypothesized that lateral decubitus position is an effective manner to prophylactically reduce the incidence of PDPH. Study Design: This meta-analysis pooled all data published in randomized controlled trials (RCTs) examining the impact of position (sitting versus lateral decubitus) during lumbar puncture and the incidence of PDPH. Settings: This work was performed at Universidad del Valle, in Cali, Colombia, in collaboration with the Department of Anesthesiology at The Johns Hopkins Hospital. Methods: Our group searched in PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library and Google Scholar for relevant RCTs, dating from 1990 to July 2016, that compared the sitting and lateral decubitus position with regards to the incidence of PDPH in adult patients (age > 18 years) undergoing lumbar puncture for spinal anesthesia or neurologic diagnosis. Results: Literature search identified 7 eligible RCTs (6 on spinal anesthesia and only one on neurologic diagnosis) with 1,101 patients, of which 557 had lumbar punctures in lateral decubitus position and 544 in sitting position. Only 3 (out of 7) RCTs favored the lateral decubitus position to significantly reduce the PDPH. Meta-analysis showed that the lateral decubitus position was associated with a significant reduction of the incidence of PDPH (risk ratio [RR] = 0.61, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.44-0.86, P = 0.004, I2 = 25%, P for heterogeneity = 0.24) compared with the sitting position. Subgroup analysis showed that lateral decubitus position is also associated with reduction of PDPH in spinal anesthesia (RR = 0.69, 95% CI = 0.50-0.95, I2 = 0%, P for heterogeneity = 0.42). We found no statistically significant association between lateral decubitus position and successful placement of spinal needle at first attempt (RR = 1.00, 95% CI = 0.92- 1.09, P = 0.94, I2 = 73%, P for heterogeneity = 0.01). There was no evidence of publication bias in our analyses (Egger’s bias = -0.05, P = 0.96). Limitations: The low number of RCTs might be an important limitation on our results. Conclusion: Our results indicate that lateral decubitus position during lumbar puncture seems to be a good alternative for preventing PDPH. Further research should focus on the new prophylactic alternatives to reduce the incidence of PDPH. Keywords: Post-dural puncture headache, sitting, lateral decubitus, meta-analysis

Lumbar Puncture in the prone position for Low Birth Weight Neonates

2022 ◽  
Vol 22 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Wanxu Guo ◽  
Di Ma ◽  
Min Qian ◽  
Xiaoqi Zhao ◽  
Jinpu Zhang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Birth Weight ◽  
Low Birth Weight ◽  
Adverse Effects ◽  
Success Rate ◽  
Lumbar Puncture ◽  
Prone Position ◽  
Lateral Decubitus Position ◽  
Standard Position ◽  
Lateral Decubitus ◽  
Position Group

Abstract Background Lumbar puncture in the lateral decubitus position will make the neonates uncomfortable and is likely to cause position change and unstable vital signs, and the application of sedative drugs will cause adverse effects. This study explored a novel method for lumbar puncture in the prone position for low weight neonates. Methods The neonates were randomly assigned into the standard position group receiving lumbar puncture in the lateral decubitus position; and the improved position group receiving lumbar puncture in the prone position. The success rate of first time attempts and the overall success rate of lumbar puncture, incidence of adverse effects, NIAPAS scores were collected and compared between these two groups. The difference in success rate and adverse effects incidence rate was analysed through Chi-square. Student’s t-test was used for the test of NIAPAS rating. Results The improved position group had a higher success rate of first attempt and overall success rate, significantly lower incidence of adverse effect and lower NIAPAS scores than those of the standard position group (P<0.05). Conclusion This lumbar puncture in the prone position is safer, more effective, and more comfortable for preterm neonates and those with low birth weight. Thus, this method is worth of further promotion. Trial registration Registration number, ChiCTR2100049923; Date of Registration, August 11, 2021; Retrospectively registered.

Surgical Techniques for Thoracoscopic Esophagectomy at the Left Lateral Decubitus Position

2019 ◽  
Vol 70 (2) ◽  
pp. 197-197
Author(s):  
H. Sato ◽  
Y. Miyawaki ◽  
N. Fujiwara ◽  
H. Sugita ◽  
M. Aikawa ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Surgical Techniques ◽  
Lateral Decubitus Position ◽  
Thoracoscopic Esophagectomy ◽  
Left Lateral Decubitus Position ◽  
Lateral Decubitus

scholarly journals Changes in the Bronchial Cuff Pressure of Left-Sided Double-Lumen Endotracheal Tube by Lateral Positioning: A Prospective Observational Study

2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (8) ◽  
pp. 1590
Author(s):  
Jong-Hae Kim ◽  
Eugene Kim ◽  
In-Young Kim ◽  
Eun-Joo Choi ◽  
Sung-Hye Byun
Keyword(s):  
Thoracic Surgery ◽  
Endotracheal Tube ◽  
Primary Outcome ◽  
Cuff Pressure ◽  
Lateral Decubitus Position ◽  
Double Lumen ◽  
Double Lumen Endotracheal Tube ◽  
Bronchial Cuff ◽  
Lateral Decubitus ◽  
Lateral Positioning

Proper bronchial cuff pressure (BCP) is important when using a double-lumen endotracheal tube (DLT), especially in thoracic surgery. As positional change during endotracheal tube placement could alter cuff pressure, we aim to evaluate the change in BCP of DLT from the supine to the lateral decubitus position during thoracic surgery. A total of 69 patients aged 18–70 years who underwent elective lung surgery were recruited. BCP was measured at a series of time points in the supine and lateral decubitus positions after confirming the DLT placement. The primary outcome was change in the initial established BCP (BCPi), which is the maximum pressure at which the BCP did not exceed 40 cmH2O without air leak in the supine position, after lateral decubitus positioning. As the primary outcome, the BCPi increased from 25.4 ± 9.0 cmH2O in the supine position to 29.1 ± 12.2 cmH2O in the lateral decubitus position (p < 0.001). Out of the 69 participants, 43 and 26 patients underwent surgery in the left-lateral decubitus position (LLD group) and the right-lateral decubitus position (RLD group) respectively. In the LLD group, the BCPi increased significantly (p < 0.001) after lateral positioning and the beginning of surgery and the difference value, ∆BCPi, from supine to lateral position was significantly higher in the LLD group than in the RLD group (p = 0.034). Positional change from supine to lateral decubitus could increase the BCPi of DLT and the increase was significantly greater in LLD that in RLD.

scholarly journals BRONCHOSPIROMETRY IN THE LATERAL DECUBITUS POSITION

1950 ◽  
Vol 19 (6) ◽  
pp. 821-829
Author(s):  
Emil Rothstein ◽  
Francis B. Landis ◽  
Benjamin G. Narodick
Keyword(s):  
Lateral Decubitus Position ◽  
Lateral Decubitus

scholarly journals The Cardiac Sympathetic Nerve Activity in the Elderly Is Attenuated in the Right Lateral Decubitus Position

2017 ◽  
Vol 3 ◽  
pp. 233372141770807 ◽  
Author(s):  
Konosuke Sasaki ◽  
Mayu Haga ◽  
Sarina Bao ◽  
Haruka Sato ◽  
Yoshikatsu Saiki ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Heart Rate ◽  
Sympathetic Nerve ◽  
Sympathetic Nerve Activity ◽  
Lateral Decubitus Position ◽  
The Other ◽  
Elderly Adults ◽  
Nerve Activity ◽  
Left Lateral Decubitus Position ◽  
Lateral Decubitus ◽  
The Right

Objectives: The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of the supine, left lateral decubitus, and right lateral decubitus positions on autonomic nervous activity in elderly adults by using spectral analysis of heart rate variability (HRV). Method: Forty-five adults aged 73.6 ± 5.7 years were enrolled. After lying in the supine position, all participants moved to the lateral decubitus positions in a random order and maintained the positions for 10 min, while electrocardiographic data were recorded to measure HRV. Results: The lowest heart rate continued for 10 min when participants were in the left lateral decubitus position compared with the other two positions ( p < .001), while the HRV indexes remained unchanged. The low-frequency HRV to high-frequency HRV ratio (LF/HF) for the right lateral decubitus position was significantly lower than that for the other positions. Discussion: The right lateral decubitus position may attenuate sympathetic nerve activity in elderly adults.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document