scholarly journals Allergic Reactions to Dental Materials- A Systematic Review

Author(s):  
Meena Syed
Radiology ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 286 (2) ◽  
pp. 731-731 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ashkan Heshmatzadeh Behzadi ◽  
Yize Zhao ◽  
Zerwa Farooq ◽  
Martin R. Prince

PLoS ONE ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 13 (2) ◽  
pp. e0193162 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniela Astudillo-Rubio ◽  
Andrés Delgado-Gaete ◽  
Carlos Bellot-Arcís ◽  
José María Montiel-Company ◽  
Agustín Pascual-Moscardó ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 55 (1) ◽  
pp. 76-89
Author(s):  
Jessica Hao ◽  
Spencer Lang ◽  
Francis Mante ◽  
Kresimir Pavelić ◽  
Fusun Ozer

Author(s):  
Carine Tais Welter Meereis ◽  
Eliseu Aldrighi Münchow ◽  
Wellington Luiz de Oliveira da Rosa ◽  
Adriana Fernandes da Silva ◽  
Evandro Piva

2022 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
pp. 14
Author(s):  
Inês Francisco ◽  
Raquel Travassos ◽  
Catarina Nunes ◽  
Madalena Ribeiro ◽  
Filipa Marques ◽  
...  

Background: There has been an increase in demand for orthodontic treatment within the adult population, who likely receive restorative treatments using ceramic structures. The current state of the art regarding the most effective method to achieve an appropriate bond strength of brackets on ceramic surfaces isn’t consensual. This systematic review aims to compare the available surface treatments to ceramics and determine the one that allows to obtain the best bond strength. Methods: This systematic review followed the PRISMA guidelines and the PICO methodology was used, with the question “What is the most effective technique for bonding brackets on ceramic crowns or veneers?”. The research was carried out in PubMed, Web of Science, Embase and Cochrane Library databases. In vitro and ex vivo studies were included. The methodological quality was evaluated using the guidelines for reporting of preclinical studies on dental materials by Faggion Jr. Results: A total of 655 articles searched in various databases were initially scrutinized. Sevety one articles were chosen for quality analysis. The risk of bias was considered medium to high in most studies. The use of hydrofluoric acid (HF), silane and laser afforded the overall best results. HF and HF plus laser achieved significantly highest bond strength scores in felsdphatic porcelain, while laser was the best treatment in lithium disilicate ceramics. Conclusions: The most effective technique for bonding brackets on ceramic is dependent on the type of ceramic.


Author(s):  
A. M. Sherene Christina Roshini ◽  
N. Aravindha Babu ◽  
R. Jayasri Krupaa ◽  
K. M. K. Masthan

Author(s):  
Eliseu Aldrighi Münchow ◽  
Carine Tais Welter Meereis ◽  
Wellington Luiz de Oliveira da Rosa ◽  
Adriana Fernandes da Silva ◽  
Evandro Piva

Materials ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 14 (7) ◽  
pp. 1675
Author(s):  
João Paulo Silva ◽  
Ana Coelho ◽  
Anabela Paula ◽  
Inês Amaro ◽  
José Saraiva ◽  
...  

The surface smoothness of composite restorations affects not only their esthetic appearance but also other properties. Thus, rough surfaces can lead to staining, plaque accumulation, gingival irritation, recurrent caries, abrasiveness, wear kinetics, and tactile perception by the patient. The aim of this study was to evaluate the influence of irrigation during the finishing and polishing of composite resin restorations. A systematic search of the PubMed, Cochrane Library, EMBASE, Web of Science, and Clinical Trials databases was conducted. Papers published up to 11 February 2021 were considered. The quality of each study was assessed using the modified Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials checklist for reporting in vitro studies on dental materials. No clinical studies were identified. Six in vitro studies were included, reporting changes in physical and esthetic properties. After performing a methodological quality assessment of the studies, some limitations were identified, the main limitation being the heterogeneous methodology across studies. The evidence resulting from this systematic review did not favor either wet or dry finishing/polishing procedures. There is a clear need for well-designed studies focusing on the comparison of dry/wet finishing/polishing with standard protocols to evaluate the differences among different materials and methods.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document