The Chinese Marine Environmental Protection Law

1999 ◽  
Vol 1999 (1) ◽  
pp. 721-723
Author(s):  
Cindy Chen ◽  
Mike Hicks

ABSTRACT The concept of marine environmental protection and its development was introduced to the People's Republic of China in the 1980s. This followed the enactment of the Environmental Protection Law (1979, 1989), a revision to the Constitution, and the adoption of international environmental laws. The Chinese Marine Environmental Protection Law (MEPL) was promulgated in 1983 after China signed the 1982 U.N. Convention on the Law of the Sea. Both national environmental laws and various international conventions and agreements influenced the MEPL. For example, the MEPL closely follows provisions outlined by the International Convention for the Prevention of Pollution from Ships (MARPOL) and other international treaties. China has concerns about marine pollution not only within its own territory but outside its jurisdiction as well. Thus, the MEPL explicitly states that the provisions of the law apply to areas beyond China's territorial sea. As provided by the MEPL, China has the right to assert jurisdiction over foreign vessels beyond its territorial sea when they engage in activities that cause pollution to China's environment. However, questions arise as to China's coastal state jurisdiction. China's view on sovereignty is a controversial issue, and it is unclear whether the MEPL can be invoked to confer liability in waters outside of China's jurisdiction. Despite uncertainty over the jurisdiction issue, the MEPL is a significant and comprehensive law for marine protection. It regulates five major sources of marine pollution: coastal construction projects, off-shore oil exploration and exploitation, land-source pollutants, vessel pollution, and the dumping of wastes at sea. The purpose of this paper is to provide a brief comparison of the MEPL and relevant international laws and an understanding of critical issues covered by the MEPL.

2017 ◽  
Vol 32 (1) ◽  
pp. 95-137 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mary George ◽  
Abdul Samad Shaik Osman ◽  
Hanafi Hussin ◽  
Anneliz Reina George

The International Maritime Organization (imo) adopted legally binding regulations for the control of ships’ atmospheric emissions under Annex vi of the International Convention for the Prevention of Marine Pollution from Ships, 1973/78. With Singapore, Malaysia and Indonesia being States Parties thereto, consequently, one of the effects in the Malacca and Singapore Straits is that it enables the Straits States, together with the imo, to designate emission control areas for the approximately 75,000 ships transiting annually. This article examines the robust provisions of Annex vi for the marine environmental protection of the Straits and the contentious debates preceding an otherwise dead-locked technology-transfer resolution for implementing Annex vi. If implemented, Annex vi provisions will represent a unique milestone in the protection of the marine environment of the Straits which is regulated by the restrictive provisions of Part iii of the 1982 United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea.


2019 ◽  
Vol 35 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Nguyen Thi Xuan Son ◽  
Nguyen Hong Thao

In the twenty-first century, before the revolution of science and technology 4.0 and 5.0, environmental protection and sustainable development are increasingly becoming a great concern of humanity as well as of each country. Among the components of the environment, the marine environment plays an important role with 71% of the Earth's surface covered with water and 90% of the biosphere is the ocean. Along with the development of the sea direction of mankind - the cradle of Earth's life - the sea is also facing serious challenges of pollution, over-fishing of marine resources. Marine environmental protection is not limited to a single country. Due to the uniformity of the marine environment, the spread of transboundary agents in the marine environment and climate change, this task requires cooperation between countries. Regional international treaties serve as a basis for cooperation in marine environmental protection. The paper will focus on analyzing and assessing regional efforts in approving regional international treaties on marine environmental protection, with a focus on environmental protection cooperation mechanisms, especially in East Asia and South East Asia. These are selected areas due to their advanced marine environmental protection experience and socio-economic similarities. Keywords: Marine environment, marine environmental pollution, regional cooperation. References: [1] ASEAN leaders statement on climate change to the 17th ses-sion oỷthe Con/erence ofthe Parties to the United Nationsỷrame¬ work cơnvention ôn clìmate change and the 7th session of the Con-/erence of parties serving as the meetỉng parties ót the Kyoto Pro-tocol. Bali, Indonesia, 18 November 2011. Truy cập ngày 22/3/2019 tại:http:// www.aseansec.org/documents/19th%20summit/ASEAN_Lead-ers%27_Statement_on_Climate_Change.pdf.[2] Bangkok Declaration on the ASEAN Environment. Bangkok, Thailand, 29 November 1984. Truy cập ngày 28/4/2019 tại:http://www.aseansec.org/6079.htm.[3] Globalism and regionalism in the protection of the marine environment, Truy cập ngày 28/4/2019 tại: https://text.123doc.org/document/740029-globalism-and-regionalism-in-the-protection-of-the-marine-environment.htm OSPAR Convention, https://www.ospar.org/convention.[4] K. Kheng-Lian, NA. Robison, Strengthening sustainable Development in Regional In-Governmental Covernance: Lessons from the “ASEAN Way”, Singapore Journal of International and Comparative Law, 2002. - 16.[5] Manila Declaration on the ASEAN Environment. Manila, Philippines, 30 April 1981, truy cập ngày 27/4/2019 tại:http://environment.asean.org/index.php?page=agreements:maniladeclaration.[6] Naoki Amako , Japan’s MPA Policies and arrangements pertaining to the work of NEAMPAN, truy cập ngày 27/4/2019 tại:http://www.neaspec.org/sites/default/files/Japan_MOE_amako.pdf. [7] New Delhi ASEAN - India Ministerial Statement on Biodi-versity. New Delhi, India, 7 September 2012. Truy cập ngày 23/3/2019 tại:http:// www.asean.org/images/2012/documents/New%20Delhi%20ASEA N%20India%20Ministerial%20Statement%20on%20Biodiver-sity%20Final.pdf.[8] JW. Davis, Global Aspectes of Marine Pollution Policy. The Need for a New International Convention (1990) 14 Marine Policy 191.


2018 ◽  
Vol 49 (4) ◽  
pp. 573 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joanna Mossop

At the conclusion of the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS) in 1982, there was considerable optimism that the Convention would usher in a new age of marine environmental protection. This article argues that, while UNCLOS did contain important innovations for marine environmental protections, key structural problems prevented the Convention from fulfilling more optimistic predictions of success. Concepts such as freedom of the high seas and exclusive flag state jurisdiction as well as the lack of an effective institution with competence over the law of the sea generally have impeded progress. Instead, states have relied on incremental development to seek improvements in the law. The article evaluates whether two recent developments will progress the goal of marine environmental protection. First, a number of recent international judicial decisions interpreting treaty and customary principles of international law have clarified and extended state environmental obligations. Second, negotiations for a new treaty on the protection and sustainable use of biodiversity in areas beyond national jurisdiction offer hope that gaps in UNCLOS might be filled.


2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (2) ◽  
pp. 163-173
Author(s):  
Markiyan Z. Kulyk

Abstract The UN Convention on the Law of the Sea sets forth an unprecedented regime for marine environmental protection that compels parties to cooperate and includes mandatory dispute settlement procedures with binding decisions. Although the Convention does not contain a specific article stipulating a general duty to cooperate, cooperation permeates the logic of the document. The International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea (ITLOS) has recognised the importance of cooperation to marine protection and preservation in several cases. It could be suggested that the States Parties have a positive obligation to cooperate and a need to implement a range of actions to this end. ITLOS has consistently interpreted the duty to cooperate as comprising specific obligations: to consult, to exchange information, to monitor and assess relevant activities, to develop measures to prevent pollution or other environmental harm; which offers both the basis for the implementation of the duty to cooperate and the criteria for determining compliance.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document