Global Disease Outbreaks and Effects on Maternal, Newborn & Child Health in Global South, a Systematic Review

Background/Aim: The world has witnessed several disease outbreaks both in the past and in recent times. Apart from loss of lives as a result of such outbreaks, there are also disruptions in health care provision and utilization due to certain measures aimed at curtailing the spread of such outbreaks. This study aimed to seek evidence from existing literature on the effects of disease outbreaks on maternal, newborn and child health care in Global South. Methods: A Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) was used and 14 literatures met the inclusion criteria. Results: HIV/AIDS pandemic affected the Maternal Newborn and Child Health since increased cases of anaemia, hospital admissions, still births in HIV positive pregnant and cases of foetal anaemia reported in infants born from HIV positive pregnant women were reported. No COVID-19 pandemic related-effects on MNCH observed since no maternal deaths and transmission from infected pregnant women to their newborns reported. Indirect effects of pandemics on MNHC include reduced service delivery and demand/utilization as well as inaccessibility due to diverse reasons. Discussion: The Government should put in place palliative measures for low-income citizens; engage and sensitize women, pregnant women and their children on available health care services and mitigation measures in place to access with minimal or no risk of being infected in a secure environment.

Download Full-text

Promoting positive maternal, newborn, and child health behaviors through a group-based health education and microfinance program: a prospective matched cohort study in western Kenya

10.21203/rs.2.11585/v2 ◽

2020 ◽

Author(s):

Lauren Yu-Lien Maldonado ◽

Julia J. Songok ◽

John W. Snelgrove ◽

Christian B. Ochieng ◽

Sheilah Chelagat ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Cohort Study ◽

Health Education ◽

Child Health ◽

Health Behaviors ◽

Pregnant Women ◽

Evidence Based ◽

Matched Cohort ◽

Western Kenya ◽

Newborn And Child Health ◽

And Child Health

Abstract Background: We launched Chamas for Change (Chamas), a group-based health education and microfinance program for pregnant women and their infants, to address inequities contributing to high rates of maternal and neonatal mortality in western Kenya. In this prospective matched cohort study, we evaluated the association between Chamas participation and uptake of evidence-based, maternal, newborn and child health (MNCH) behaviors. Methods: We prospectively compared the uptake of MNCH behaviors between a cohort of Chamas participants and controls matched for age, parity, and prenatal care location. Between October-December 2012, government-sponsored community health volunteers (CHV) recruited pregnant women attending their first antenatal care (ANC) visits at health facilities in Busia County to participate in Chamas . Women enrolled in Chamas agreed to attend bi-monthly group health education and optional microfinance sessions for 12 months. We collected baseline sociodemographic data at study enrollment for each cohort. We used descriptive analyses and adjusted multivariable logistic regression models to compare outcomes across cohorts at 6-12 months postpartum, with α set to 0.05. Results: Compared to controls (n=115), a significantly higher proportion of Chamas participants (n=211) delivered in a facility with a skilled birth attendant (84.4% vs. 50.4%, p<0.001), attended at least four ANC visits (64.0% vs. 37.4%, p<0·001), exclusively breastfed to six months (82.0% vs. 47.0%, p<0·001), and received a CHV home visit within 48 hours postpartum (75.8% vs. 38.3%, p<0·001). In our adjusted models, Chamas participants were nearly five times as likely as controls to deliver in a health facility (OR 5.07, 95% CI 2.74-9.36, p<0.001). Though not statistically significant, Chamas participants experienced a lower proportion of stillbirths (0.9% vs. 5.2%), miscarriages (5.2% vs. 7.8%), infant deaths (2.8% vs. 3.4%), and maternal deaths (0.9% vs. 1.7%) compared to controls. Our sensitivity analyses revealed no significant difference in the odds of facility delivery based on microfinance participation. Conclusions: Chamas participation was associated with increased practice of evidence-based MNCH health behaviors among pregnant women in western Kenya. Our findings demonstrate this program’s potential to achieve population-level MNCH benefits; however, a larger study is needed to validate this observed effect.

Download Full-text

Increasing uptake of maternal, newborn, and child health interventions through a group-based health education and microfinance program: a prospective matched cohort study in western Kenya

10.21203/rs.2.11585/v1 ◽

2019 ◽

Author(s):

Lauren Yu-Lien Maldonado ◽

Julia J. Songok ◽

John W. Snelgrove ◽

Christian B. Ochieng ◽

Sheilah Chelagat ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Cohort Study ◽

Health Education ◽

Child Health ◽

Pregnant Women ◽

Matched Cohort ◽

Western Kenya ◽

Newborn And Child Health ◽

Matched Cohort Study ◽

Significant Difference ◽

And Child Health

Abstract Background We launched Chamas for Change (Chamas), a group-based health education and microfinance program for pregnant women and their infants, to address inequities contributing to high rates of maternal and neonatal mortality in western Kenya. In this prospective matched cohort study, we evaluated Chamas’ impact on improving uptake of evidence-based maternal, newborn and child health (MNCH) interventions. Methods We prospectively compared MNCH intervention uptake between a cohort of Chamas participants and controls matched for age, parity, and prenatal care location. Between October-December 2012, government-sponsored community health volunteers (CHV) recruited pregnant women in Busia county attending their first antenatal care (ANC) visit to participate in Chamas and enroll in this study. Upon joining, women agreed to attend bi-monthly group health education and optional microfinance sessions for 12 months. We selected controls among non-Chamas participants who attended the same ANC clinics. We collected baseline sociodemographic and reproductive health data at study enrollment. We used descriptive analyses and adjusted multivariable logistic regression models to compare outcomes across cohorts at 6-12 months postpartum, with α set to 0.05. Results Compared to controls (n=115), a significantly higher proportion of Chamas participants (n=211) delivered in a facility with a skilled birth attendant (84.4% vs. 50.4%, p<0.001), attended at least four ANC visits (64.0% vs. 37.4%, p<0·001), exclusively breastfed to six months (82.0% vs. 47.0%, p<0·001), and received a CHV home visit within 48 hours postpartum (75.8% vs. 38.3%, p<0·001). In our adjusted models, Chamas participants were nearly five times as likely as controls to deliver in a health facility (OR 5.07, 95% CI 2.74-9.36, p<0.001). Though not statistically significant, Chamas participants experienced fewer stillbirths than non-participants (n=2 vs. n=6, p=0.083). Our sensitivity analyses revealed no significant difference in the odds of facility delivery based on microfinance participation. Conclusions Chamas participation was associated with increased uptake of MNCH interventions among pregnant women in western Kenya. Our findings demonstrate this program’s potential to achieve population-level maternal and infant health benefits; however, a larger study is needed to validate this observed effect.

Download Full-text

Are the poorest poor being left behind? Estimating global inequalities in reproductive, maternal, newborn and child health

BMJ Global Health ◽

10.1136/bmjgh-2019-002229 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 5 (1) ◽

pp. e002229 ◽

Cited By ~ 4

Author(s):

Aluisio J D Barros ◽

Fernando C Wehrmeister ◽

Leonardo Zanini Ferreira ◽

Luis Paulo Vidaletti ◽

Ahmad Reza Hosseinpoor ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Child Health ◽

Low Income ◽

Multilevel Models ◽

Wealth Quintile ◽

High Coverage ◽

Newborn And Child Health ◽

Absolute Income ◽

The Poor ◽

Women And Children ◽

And Child Health

IntroductionWealth-related inequalities in reproductive, maternal, neonatal and child health have been widely studied by dividing the population into quintiles. We present a comprehensive analysis of wealth inequalities for the composite coverage index (CCI) using national health surveys carried out since 2010, using wealth deciles and absolute income estimates as stratification variables, and show how these new approaches expand on traditional equity analyses.Methods83 low-income and middle-income countries were studied. The CCI is a combined measure of coverage with eight key reproductive, maternal, newborn and child health interventions. It was disaggregated by wealth deciles for visual inspection of inequalities, and the slope index of inequality (SII) was estimated. The correlation between coverage in the extreme deciles and SII was assessed. Finally, we used multilevel models to examine how the CCI varies according to the estimated absolute income for each wealth quintile in the surveys.ResultsThe analyses of coverage by wealth deciles and by absolute income show that inequality is mostly driven by coverage among the poor, which is much more variable than coverage among the rich across countries. Regardless of national coverage, in 61 of the countries, the wealthiest decile achieved 70% or higher CCI coverage. Well-performing countries were particularly effective in achieving high coverage among the poor. In contrast, underperforming countries failed to reach the poorest, despite reaching the better-off.ConclusionThere are huge inequalities between the richest and the poorest women and children in most countries. These inequalities are strongly driven by low coverage among the poorest given the wealthiest groups achieve high coverage irrespective of where they live, overcoming any barriers that are an impediment to others. Countries that ‘punched above their weight’ in coverage, given their level of absolute wealth, were those that best managed to reach their poorest women and children.

Download Full-text