scholarly journals Soliqua (Lixi Lan): Sustained Long Term Cost Efficacy and Safety When Used in Combination with Metformin and Glimepiride

Author(s):  
Udaya M. Kabadi ◽  
Sarah Exley

Background: Previous studies using basal insulin documented the lowest daily dose and least hypoglycemic events when combined with Glimepiride and Metformin while attaining desirable glycemic control. However, Pivotal trials with Soliqua excluded Glimepiride as a part of therapy as well as subjects with moderate obesity (BMI > 35kg/m2). Moreover, these trials were relatively short term. Objective: Assess long term efficacy and safety of Soliqua in combination with Glimepiride and Metformin in subjects with type 2 diabetes irrespective of BMI in ‘real world’ experience. Subjects: 30 adults with type 2 diabetes, age range 32-72 years with HbA1C >7.5% while receiving therapy with 1) Glimepiride, Metformin and Basal insulin and 2) Metformin and/or DPP 4 inhibitors and/or other SUs and /or GLP1 RA and/or Basal insulin and/or prandial insulin. Type 2 diabetes was confirmed by presence of C-peptide. Subjects with history of gastroparesis, Triglycerides over 300 mg/dl and pancreatitis were excluded. Subjects with elevated liver enzymes, over 2.5 times normal and EGFR < 30 ml/min were excluded as well. Methods: All prior therapies were discontinued. All subjects were started on Glimepiride 8 mg, Metformin 1000-2000 mg and SC Soliqua was initiated prior to breakfast with daily dose 15 or 30 units as recommended. Daily dose was increased by 2 units every 3 days until AM fasting plasma glucose of 80-130 mg/dl was attained or the dose of 60 units was reached. The stable daily dose of Soliqua was continued until the time of analysis. Comparisons were conducted between body weights (kg), fasting plasma glucose (FPG) and HbA1C prior to initiation of combination therapy (pre Rx) and every 3-6 months until the time of analysis (post Rx). Results: BMI ranged between 22-67 kg/m2. Duration of diabetes was 5-25 years. Duration of therapy with the combination therapy range, 7-56 months. Subjects were divided into 2 groups according to desirable HbA1C levels as per recommendations by ADA: 1) desirable HbA1C is < 7.0%, 2) desirable HbA1C 7-8 %. Both Fasting plasma glucose (mg/dl) and HbA1C (%) declined from 167 ± 10 and 9.7 ± 0.8 to 114 ± 4 and 7.6± 0.3 at the time of analyses (post Rx) respectively in the whole cohort. In 4 (0.13 %) morbidly obese subjects, FPG and HbA1C levels declined though not achieving desirable glycemic goals despite receiving maximal daily dose, 60 units of Soliqua. All four belonged to group 1. In the remaining 17 subjects desirable glycemic levels were attained and maintained. In group 2, desirable glycemia was reached in all 9 subjects. Symptomatic hypoglycemic events confirmed by blood sugar <70 mg/dl were reported by 4 subjects, none requiring secondary assistance. No severe hypoglycemia was reported. Mean daily dose of Soliqua was lower when compared to the pivotal trials. Conclusion: Soliqua is effective and safe in the long term in all subjects irrespective of BMI when administered in combination with Glimepiride and Metformin. Moreover, lesser daily dose required to attain desirable glycemia with this oral combination may render it to be effective without attaining maximum daily dose in subjects with higher BMIs documented in pivotal trials using Metformin alone.

2016 ◽  
Vol 2016 ◽  
pp. 1-10 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mengyi Li ◽  
Xuemin Huang ◽  
Hui Ye ◽  
Yao Chen ◽  
Jing Yu ◽  
...  

Aims. To evaluate the efficacy and safety of mulberry twig alkaloid (SZ-A) tablet compared with acarbose in patients with type 2 diabetes.Methods. This clinical trial enrolled 38 patients who were randomized into two groups (SZ-A: 23; acarbose: 15) and were treated for 24 weeks. Patients and clinical trial staffs were masked to treatment assignment throughout the study. The primary outcome measures were glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) and 1-hour and 2-hour postprandial and fasting plasma glucose levels from baseline to the end of treatment. Analysis included all patients who completed this study.Results. By the end of this study, HbA1c level in SZ-A group was decreased from baseline significantly (P<0.001). No significant difference was found when compared with acarbose group (P=0.652). Similarly, 1-hour and 2-hour postprandial plasma glucose levels in SZ-A group were decreased from baseline statistically (P<0.05), without any significant differences compared with acarbose group (P=0.748and 0.558, resp.). The fasting plasma glucose levels were not significantly changed in both groups. One of 23 patients in SZ-A group (4.76%) and 5 of 15 patients in acarbose group (33.33%) suffered from gastrointestinal adverse events.Conclusions. Compared with acarbose, SZ-A tablet was effective and safe in glycemic control in patients with type 2 diabetes.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jessica Annalena Huthmacher ◽  
Juris J. Meier ◽  
Michael A. Nauck

<b>Background/Purpose.</b> To compare efficacy and safety of short- and long-acting GLP-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RAs), both used in combination with basal insulin in patients with type 2 diabetes.<b></b> <p><b> </b></p> <p><b>Data Sources/Study Selection.</b><b><i> </i></b>Randomized controlled trials comparing the co-administration of short- or long-acting GLP-1 RAs and basal insulin with basal insulin ± placebo were identified (PubMed search). Of 974 identified publications 14 clinical trials were included. Eight trials examined short-acting and six long-acting GLP-1 RAs.<b></b></p> <p><b> </b></p> <p><b>Data Extraction/Data Synthesis.</b> Differences in HbA<sub>1c</sub>, fasting plasma glucose, body weight and adverse events were compared between studies using short- or long-acting GLP-1 RAs by random-effects meta-analysis.</p> <p><b> </b></p> <p><b>Limitations. </b>Relatively small numbers of available publications, some heterogeneity regarding protocols and differences in the GLP-1 RA compound used.</p> <p><b> </b></p> <p><b>Conclusions.</b> Long-acting GLP-1 RAs more effectively reduced HbA<sub>1c</sub> (∆ - 6 mmol/mol, [95 % CI - 10; - 2], p= 0.007), fasting plasma glucose (∆ - 0.7 mmol/l [- 1.2; - 0.3] p= 0.007) and body weight (∆ - 1.4 kg [- 2.2; - 0.6] p= 0.002) and raised the proportion of patients achieving an HbA<sub>1c</sub> target < 7.0% (< 53 mmol/mol; p= 0.03) more than the short-acting ones. Patients reporting symptomatic (p= 0.048), but not severe hypoglycemia (p= 0.96) were fewer with long- vs. short-acting GLP-1 RAs added to insulin. The proportion of patients reporting nausea (- 52 %; p < 0.0001) or vomiting (- 36 %; p= 0.0002) was lower with long-acting GLP-1 RAs.<b> </b>Overall, GLP-1 RAs improved HbA<sub>1c</sub>, fasting plasma glucose and body weight when added to basal insulin. However, long-acting GLP-1 RAs were significantly more effective for glycemic and body weight control and displayed better gastro-intestinal tolerability. </p>


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jessica Annalena Huthmacher ◽  
Juris J. Meier ◽  
Michael A. Nauck

<b>Background/Purpose.</b> To compare efficacy and safety of short- and long-acting GLP-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RAs), both used in combination with basal insulin in patients with type 2 diabetes.<b></b> <p><b> </b></p> <p><b>Data Sources/Study Selection.</b><b><i> </i></b>Randomized controlled trials comparing the co-administration of short- or long-acting GLP-1 RAs and basal insulin with basal insulin ± placebo were identified (PubMed search). Of 974 identified publications 14 clinical trials were included. Eight trials examined short-acting and six long-acting GLP-1 RAs.<b></b></p> <p><b> </b></p> <p><b>Data Extraction/Data Synthesis.</b> Differences in HbA<sub>1c</sub>, fasting plasma glucose, body weight and adverse events were compared between studies using short- or long-acting GLP-1 RAs by random-effects meta-analysis.</p> <p><b> </b></p> <p><b>Limitations. </b>Relatively small numbers of available publications, some heterogeneity regarding protocols and differences in the GLP-1 RA compound used.</p> <p><b> </b></p> <p><b>Conclusions.</b> Long-acting GLP-1 RAs more effectively reduced HbA<sub>1c</sub> (∆ - 6 mmol/mol, [95 % CI - 10; - 2], p= 0.007), fasting plasma glucose (∆ - 0.7 mmol/l [- 1.2; - 0.3] p= 0.007) and body weight (∆ - 1.4 kg [- 2.2; - 0.6] p= 0.002) and raised the proportion of patients achieving an HbA<sub>1c</sub> target < 7.0% (< 53 mmol/mol; p= 0.03) more than the short-acting ones. Patients reporting symptomatic (p= 0.048), but not severe hypoglycemia (p= 0.96) were fewer with long- vs. short-acting GLP-1 RAs added to insulin. The proportion of patients reporting nausea (- 52 %; p < 0.0001) or vomiting (- 36 %; p= 0.0002) was lower with long-acting GLP-1 RAs.<b> </b>Overall, GLP-1 RAs improved HbA<sub>1c</sub>, fasting plasma glucose and body weight when added to basal insulin. However, long-acting GLP-1 RAs were significantly more effective for glycemic and body weight control and displayed better gastro-intestinal tolerability. </p>


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jessica Annalena Huthmacher ◽  
Juris J. Meier ◽  
Michael A. Nauck

<b>Background/Purpose.</b> To compare efficacy and safety of short- and long-acting GLP-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RAs), both used in combination with basal insulin in patients with type 2 diabetes.<b></b> <p><b> </b></p> <p><b>Data Sources/Study Selection.</b><b><i> </i></b>Randomized controlled trials comparing the co-administration of short- or long-acting GLP-1 RAs and basal insulin with basal insulin ± placebo were identified (PubMed search). Of 974 identified publications 14 clinical trials were included. Eight trials examined short-acting and six long-acting GLP-1 RAs.<b></b></p> <p><b> </b></p> <p><b>Data Extraction/Data Synthesis.</b> Differences in HbA<sub>1c</sub>, fasting plasma glucose, body weight and adverse events were compared between studies using short- or long-acting GLP-1 RAs by random-effects meta-analysis.</p> <p><b> </b></p> <p><b>Limitations. </b>Relatively small numbers of available publications, some heterogeneity regarding protocols and differences in the GLP-1 RA compound used.</p> <p><b> </b></p> <p><b>Conclusions.</b> Long-acting GLP-1 RAs more effectively reduced HbA<sub>1c</sub> (∆ - 6 mmol/mol, [95 % CI - 10; - 2], p= 0.007), fasting plasma glucose (∆ - 0.7 mmol/l [- 1.2; - 0.3] p= 0.007) and body weight (∆ - 1.4 kg [- 2.2; - 0.6] p= 0.002) and raised the proportion of patients achieving an HbA<sub>1c</sub> target < 7.0% (< 53 mmol/mol; p= 0.03) more than the short-acting ones. Patients reporting symptomatic (p= 0.048), but not severe hypoglycemia (p= 0.96) were fewer with long- vs. short-acting GLP-1 RAs added to insulin. The proportion of patients reporting nausea (- 52 %; p < 0.0001) or vomiting (- 36 %; p= 0.0002) was lower with long-acting GLP-1 RAs.<b> </b>Overall, GLP-1 RAs improved HbA<sub>1c</sub>, fasting plasma glucose and body weight when added to basal insulin. However, long-acting GLP-1 RAs were significantly more effective for glycemic and body weight control and displayed better gastro-intestinal tolerability. </p>


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document