scholarly journals Phytochemical Variation of a Poly-herbal Formula According to Its Preparation Method: Qualitative & Quantitative Analysis

Author(s):  
R. L. D. S. Ranasinghe ◽  
R. H. S. K. De Silva ◽  
L. D. A. M. Arawwawala ◽  
H. G. S. G. Wijesiriwardhana

Madhyama Rasnadi decoction, one of the poly-herbal decoctions used in Ayurveda medicine is especially indicated for inflammatory conditions. The literature provides three different preparation methods of this decoction viz; Sri Lankan Traditional method (Method 1) and methods described in the texts Sharangadhara Samhita (Method 2) and Bhaishajya Ratnavali (Method 3). The aim of this study was to analyse and compare the phytochemical profiles of these three preparation techniques. Phytochemical profile analysis was carried out by (i) investigation of the extractable matter in 1 ml of decoction, (ii) development of Thin Layer Chromatography profiles and (iii) qualitative/quantitative determination of major phytoconstituents. Results revealed that the extractable matter of methods 1, 2 and 3 was 310±0 mg/ml, 420±0 mg/ml and 180±0 mg/ml, respectively. Differences (in terms of the number of spots and intensity) were observed in TLC fingerprint profiles, and phytochemicals such as phenols, tannins, flavonoids, saponins, alkaloids and terpenoids were present in all three types of decoctions. Gallic acid and quercetin were taken as standards to express the results of polyphenolic and flavonoid contents, respectively. Total polyphenolic contents of decoctions prepared according to methods 1, 2 and 3 were 121.68±0.60, 178.40±0.56, 86.20±0.25 mg gallic acid equivalents/g extract respectively. Total flavonoid contents of decoctions prepared according to methods 1, 2 and 3 were 69.45± 0.80, 129.30±0.65, 52.64± 0.50 mg quercetin acid equivalents/g extract respectively. In conclusion, more phytochemicals are concentrated on the decoction that made of method 2. The study opens more vistas of clinical applicability of Madhyama Rasnadi decoction, where further randomised case-control studies are needed.

1967 ◽  
Vol 50 (2) ◽  
pp. 250-255 ◽  
Author(s):  
Susie N Hagan ◽  
Elizabeth W Murphy ◽  
Lydia M Shelley

Abstract Study shows that chloroform-methanol extraction to remove lipids from beef yielded percentages of total fat equal to or greater than those obtained by the AOAC method. The ratio of phospholipid to triglyceride was always higher in the chloroform-methanol extracted samples. Six extraction methodsolvent system combinations, three drying procedures, and two sample preparation methods were compared. Tlie extracted lipids were separated by thin layer chromatography. The ratio of phospholipid to triglyceride was calculated after the spectrophotometric determination of the ester groups present. Acid-hydrolysis-Rohrig gave the lowest yield of total lipid and of phospholipid. Sample preparation method or drying method caused few significant dif. ferenccs in the proportions of total solids and of total lipids in the beef cuts analyzed


2000 ◽  
Vol 83 (6) ◽  
pp. 1480-1483 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sateesh K Chauhan ◽  
Brijpal Singh ◽  
Sudhakar Agrawal

Abstract A simple and reproducible high-performance thin-layer chromatographic method was developed for the simultaneous determination of bergenin and gallic acid in Bergenia ligulata. Water and methanol were used as the extracting solvents. The concentrations of bergenin and gallic acid in both of these solvents were found to be almost the same. The method involves separation of the components by thin-layer chromatography on a precoated Silica Gel 60 F254 plate with a solvent system of ethyl acetate–formic acid–acetic acid–water (100 + 11 + 11 + 27). The sensitivity of the method for bergenin was 0.30 μg, whereas for gallic acid it was 0.25 μg. The proposed method is precise and sensitive and can be used for the detection, monitoring, and simultaneous quantification of bergenin and gallic acid in B. ligulata.


1980 ◽  
Vol 63 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-4 ◽  
Author(s):  
Miroslav Dadic ◽  
Joris E A Van Gheluwe ◽  
Robert L Weaver

Abstract Free gallic acid and total gallotannins are determined in wine and cider by thin layer densitometry. The beverage is extracted with ethyl acetate and the extract is subjected to thin layer chromatography on silica gel. After elution with chloroform-ethyl formate-formic acid (50+40+ 10), the dry plate is sprayed uniformly with a freshly prepared solution of 0.3% aqueous FeCl3 and 0.3% aqueous K3FeCN6. If the gallic acid spot appears (Rf 0.28), densitometry readings are taken at 600 nm, and free gallic acid (GAF) is calculated from the formula GAF = GA (μg, from calibration curve) × 1.25. The calibration curve was obtained by plotting thin layer densitometric readings at 600 nm (prussian blue) vs. μg gallic acid. In a second method, the beverage is hydrolyzed, and extraction and densitometry are performed as before to give “total gallic acid after hydrolysis:” GAH (mg/L) = GA (μg, from calibration curve) × 25. Total gallotannins (GALLT) are calculated from the formula: GALLT (mg/L) = GAH – GAF. Results for 10 wines and 5 ciders are presented and briefly discussed.


Planta Medica ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 77 (12) ◽  
Author(s):  
M Koşar ◽  
F Göger ◽  
N Kırımer ◽  
KHC Başer

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document