scholarly journals Intravenous Lidocaine for Effective Pain Relief After a Laparoscopic Colectomy: A Prospective, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study

2015 ◽  
Vol 100 (3) ◽  
pp. 394-401 ◽  
Author(s):  
EunJin Ahn ◽  
Hyun Kang ◽  
Geun Joo Choi ◽  
Yong Hee Park ◽  
So Young Yang ◽  
...  

A perioperative intravenous lidocaine infusion has been reported to decrease postoperative pain. The goal of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of intravenous lidocaine in reducing postoperative pain for laparoscopic colectomy patients. Fifty-five patients scheduled for an elective laparoscopic colectomy were randomly assigned to 2 groups. Group L received an intravenous bolus injection of lidocaine 1.5 mg/kg before intubation, followed by 2 mg/kg/h continuous infusion during the operation. Group C received the same dosage of saline at the same time. Postoperative pain was assessed at 2, 4, 8, 12, 24, and 48 hours after surgery by using the visual analog scale (VAS). Fentanyl consumption by patient-controlled plus investigator-controlled rescue administration and the total number of button pushes were measured at 2, 4, 8, 12, 24, and 48 hours after surgery. In addition, C-reactive protein (CRP) levels were checked on the operation day and postoperative days 1, 2, 3, and 5. VAS scores were significantly lower in group L than group C until 24 hours after surgery. Fentanyl consumption was lower in group L than group C until 12 hours after surgery. Moreover, additional fentanyl injections and the total number of button pushes appeared to be lower in group L than group C (P < 0.05). The CRP level tended to be lower in group L than group C, especially on postoperative day1 and 2 and appeared to be statistically significant. The satisfaction score was higher in group L than group C (P = 0.024). Intravenous lidocaine infusion during an operation reduces pain after a laparoscopic colectomy.

Circulation ◽  
2007 ◽  
Vol 116 (suppl_16) ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Davidson ◽  
J. Lekstrom-Himes ◽  
J. Gilbert ◽  
D. Donaldson ◽  
Y. Lee ◽  
...  

Background: Macrophages play a central role in atherosclerotic plaque formation. The CC chemokine receptor 2 (CCR2), expressed on the surface of circulating monocytes, and its ligand MCP-1 (CCL2), are present in atherosclerotic plaques and may play a critical part in endothelial monocyte recruitment and activation. MLN1202 is a humanized monoclonal antibody with high specificity to CCR2, which interrupts MCP-1 binding to CCR2. MLN1202 is being developed for the treatment of immune mediated diseases. Hypothesis: We tested the hypothesis that MLN1202 significantly influences disease activity in patients at risk for ASCVD as measured by a reduction in circulating levels of high sensitivity C-reactive protein (hsCRP), an established biomarker of inflammation. Trial Design: In this double-blind placebo controlled study patients with at least 2 or more risk factors for ASCVD, no history or symptoms of ASCVD disease, and circulating levels of hsCRP > 3mg/L, were randomized 1:1 to receive a single infusion of 10 mg/kg MLN1202 (n 56) or placebo (n = 56). Subjects with hypercholesterolemia on stable doses of lipid-lowering agents were included. Circulating levels of hsCRP were determined every 2 weeks, and clinical examination performed every 4 weeks for 16 weeks following treatment. Results and Conclusion: Patients were recruited from nine centers in the US. The study population had a mean age of 60.9 years and included subjects with hypertension (59%), hypercholesterolemia (70%), significant smoking history (28%), and type 2 diabetes (16%). At screening the median value CRP was 6.8 mg/L with interquartile range from 4.7–9.3 mg/L. PK/PD results showed that the plasma level of MLN1202 required for > 90% receptor saturation was maintained for 6 to 8 weeks. A between-group difference in reduction of hsCRP was statistically significant from week 4 through week 8 following dosing. The maximum difference in absolute median reduction was observed at week 8 and it was 1.6 mg/L (p = 0.0275; Wilcoxon); the observed median percent reduction of hsCRP was 24.2% for MLN1202 group versus 2.5% increase for placebo group at 8 weeks (p = 0.0089; Wilcoxon). These data indicate that blockade of CCR2 reduces a biomarker related to inflammation in patients at risk for ASCVD.


2007 ◽  
Vol 106 (1) ◽  
pp. 11-18 ◽  
Author(s):  
Abdourahamane Kaba ◽  
Stanislas R. Laurent ◽  
Bernard J. Detroz ◽  
Daniel I. Sessler ◽  
Marcel E. Durieux ◽  
...  

Background Intravenous infusion of lidocaine decreases postoperative pain and speeds the return of bowel function. The authors therefore tested the hypothesis that perioperative lidocaine infusion facilitates acute rehabilitation protocol in patients undergoing laparoscopic colectomy. Methods Forty patients scheduled to undergo laparoscopic colectomy were randomly allocated to receive intravenous lidocaine (bolus injection of 1.5 mg/kg lidocaine at induction of anesthesia, then a continuous infusion of 2 mg.kg.h intraoperatively and 1.33 mg.kg.h for 24 h postoperatively) or an equal volume of saline. All patients received similar intensive postoperative rehabilitation. Postoperative pain scores, opioid consumption, and fatigue scores were measured. Times to first flatus, defecation, and hospital discharge were recorded. Postoperative endocrine (cortisol and catecholamines) and metabolic (leukocytes, C-reactive protein, and glucose) responses were measured for 48 h. Data (presented as median [25-75% interquartile range], lidocaine vs. saline groups) were analyzed using Mann-Whitney tests. P<0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results Patient demographics were similar in the two groups. Times to first flatus (17 [11-24] vs. 28 [25-33] h; P<0.001), defecation (28 [24-37] vs. 51 [41-70] h; P=0.001), and hospital discharge (2 [2-3] vs. 3 [3-4] days; P=0.001) were significantly shorter in patients who received lidocaine. Lidocaine significantly reduced opioid consumption (8 [5-18] vs. 22 [14-36] mg; P=0.005) and postoperative pain and fatigue scores. In contrast, endocrine and metabolic responses were similar in the two groups. Conclusions Intravenous lidocaine improves postoperative analgesia, fatigue, and bowel function after laparoscopic colectomy. These benefits are associated with a significant reduction in hospital stay.


2014 ◽  
Vol 11 (3) ◽  
pp. 254-259 ◽  
Author(s):  
L Pathak ◽  
A Chaturvedi

Background: In addition to chronic pain and anxiety disorders, few studies have found promising role of gabapentin in relieving acute postoperative pain as well as acute anxiety too. Objectives: To evaluate the effect of gabapentin premedication on preoperative anxiety and postoperative pain in patients undergoing elective open cholecystectomy. Methods: A prospective, randomized, double blind and placebo controlled study. Eighty adult patients of ASA I and II were divided into 2 groups of 40 each. Patients in group 1 and group 2 received capsules Gabapentin (1200mg) or identical placebo capsules 2 hours prior to surgery respectively. Preoperative anxiety and 12 hours postoperative pain was assessed using Anxiety and Pain VAS score respectively along with the observation of side effects. Postoperatively, intravenous pethidine 0.5 mg/kg was given when pain VAS > 40mm and time to first pethidine injection and total pethidine consumption in 12 hours was recorded. Results: Anxiety VAS scores after one hour of drug intake (35.75±20.11 versus 46.63±12.73) and just before induction of anaesthesia (45.75±30.27versus 68.13±29.84) along with postoperative Pain VAS scores were significantly lower in gabapentin group. Time to the first pethidine demand was significantly longer (145.34±194.54 min versus 26.30±51.02min) and cumulative pethidine consumption throughout study period was also significantly lower (35.91 ± 16.61 versus 57.84 ± 20.72mg) in gabapentin group. Conclusions: 1200 mg gabapentin premedication in open cholecystectomy patients significantly reduced preoperative anxiety, postoperative pain and total pethidine consumption with negligible side effects. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3126/hren.v11i3.9642 Health Renaissance 2013;11(3):254-259


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document