scholarly journals Information needs of francophone health care professionals and the public with regard to medical assistance in dying in Quebec: a qualitative study

CMAJ Open ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 7 (2) ◽  
pp. E190-E196
Author(s):  
Antoine Boivin ◽  
François-Pierre Gauvin ◽  
Geneviève Garnon ◽  
Agustina Gancia ◽  
Ghislaine Rouly ◽  
...  
2021 ◽  
Vol 22 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Julie Allard ◽  
Fabian Ballesteros ◽  
Marie-Chantal Fortin

Abstract Background Medical assistance in dying (MAID) has been legal in Québec since December 2015 and in the rest of Canada since July 2016. Since then, more than 60 people have donated their organs after MAID. Such donations raise ethical issues about respect of patients’ autonomy, potential pressure to choose MAID, the information given to potential donors, the acceptability of directed donations in such a context and the possibility of death by donation. The objective of this study was to explore Québec professionals’ perspectives on the ethical issues related to organ donation after MAID. Methods We conducted semi-directed interviews with 21 health care professionals involved in organ donation such as intensivists and intensive care nurses, operating room nurses, organ donation nurses and coordinators. Results The participants were all favourable to organ donation after MAID in order to respect patients’ autonomy. They also favoured informing all potential donors of the possibility of donating organs. They highlighted the importance of assessing donors’ reasons for requesting MAID during the assessment. They were divided on directed donation, living donation before MAID and death by donation. Conclusion Organ donation after MAID was widely accepted among the participants, based on the principle of respect for the donor’s autonomy. The findings of this study only provide the perspectives of Québec health care professionals involved in organ donation. Future studies are needed to gather other stakeholders’ perspectives on this issue as well as patients’ and families’ experiences of organ donation after MAID.


Appetite ◽  
2007 ◽  
Vol 48 (2) ◽  
pp. 241-247 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eva Landström ◽  
Birgitta Sidenvall ◽  
Ulla-Kaisa Koivisto Hursti ◽  
Maria Magnusson

1994 ◽  
Vol 1 (5) ◽  
pp. 395-403 ◽  
Author(s):  
N. B. Giuse ◽  
J. T. Huber ◽  
D. A. Giuse ◽  
C. W. Brown ◽  
R. A. Bankowitz ◽  
...  

BMJ Leader ◽  
2021 ◽  
pp. leader-2021-000509
Author(s):  
Marcel Levi

BackgroundThe NHS is a fascinating health care system and is enjoying a lot of support from all layers of British society. However, it is clear that the system has excellent features but also areas that can be improved.Story of selfA number of years as a chief executive in one of London’s largest hospital has brought me a wealth of impressions, experiences, and understanding about working in the NHS. Contrasting those to my previous experience as chief executive in Amsterdam (The Netherlands) provides an interesting insight.ObservationsVery strong features of the NHS are the high level of health care professionals, the focus on quality and safety, and involvement of patients and the public. However, the NHS can significantly improve by addressing the lack of clinical professionals in the lead, curtailing ever increasing bureaucracy, and reducing its peculiar preference for outsourcing even the most crucial activities to private parties. The frequent inability to swiftly and successfully complete goal-directed negotiations as well as the large but from a clinical point of view irrelevant private sector are areas of sustained bewilderment. Lastly, the drive for innovation and transformation as well as the level of biomedical research in the NHS and supported by the British universities is fascinating and outstanding.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document