Are there consequentialist grounds for exempting religious health care professionals from medical assistance in dying?

Author(s):  
Daniel Weinstock
CMAJ Open ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 7 (2) ◽  
pp. E190-E196
Author(s):  
Antoine Boivin ◽  
François-Pierre Gauvin ◽  
Geneviève Garnon ◽  
Agustina Gancia ◽  
Ghislaine Rouly ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 22 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Julie Allard ◽  
Fabian Ballesteros ◽  
Marie-Chantal Fortin

Abstract Background Medical assistance in dying (MAID) has been legal in Québec since December 2015 and in the rest of Canada since July 2016. Since then, more than 60 people have donated their organs after MAID. Such donations raise ethical issues about respect of patients’ autonomy, potential pressure to choose MAID, the information given to potential donors, the acceptability of directed donations in such a context and the possibility of death by donation. The objective of this study was to explore Québec professionals’ perspectives on the ethical issues related to organ donation after MAID. Methods We conducted semi-directed interviews with 21 health care professionals involved in organ donation such as intensivists and intensive care nurses, operating room nurses, organ donation nurses and coordinators. Results The participants were all favourable to organ donation after MAID in order to respect patients’ autonomy. They also favoured informing all potential donors of the possibility of donating organs. They highlighted the importance of assessing donors’ reasons for requesting MAID during the assessment. They were divided on directed donation, living donation before MAID and death by donation. Conclusion Organ donation after MAID was widely accepted among the participants, based on the principle of respect for the donor’s autonomy. The findings of this study only provide the perspectives of Québec health care professionals involved in organ donation. Future studies are needed to gather other stakeholders’ perspectives on this issue as well as patients’ and families’ experiences of organ donation after MAID.


Author(s):  
Gali Katznelson ◽  
Jacek Orzylowski

A 2017 survey of 529 psychiatrists in Canada found that while 72% of psychiatrists supported medical assistance in dying (MAID) in some cases, only 29.4% supported MAID solely on the basis of mental disorders.  Understanding and addressing the concerns of mental health professionals will be crucial in deciding whether and how to expand MAID solely for a mental disorder in Canada. The report, “The State of Knowledge on Medical Assistance in Dying Where a Mental Disorder Is the Sole Underlying Medical Condition,” authored by The Council of Canadian Academies, highlights some concerns that mental health professionals might harbour. These include potentially feeling that there is a conflict between providing MAID and their duties as mental health care workers, the subjectivity of the current law, and Canada’s inequitable mental health care system.


2020 ◽  
Vol 23 (11) ◽  
pp. 1468-1477 ◽  
Author(s):  
Janine Brown ◽  
Donna Goodridge ◽  
Averi Harrison ◽  
Jordan Kemp ◽  
Lilian Thorpe ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 1 (suppl_1) ◽  
pp. 586-587
Author(s):  
J. Fujioka ◽  
C. Klinger ◽  
R.M. Mirza ◽  
M. Sahar ◽  
A. Dillman ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
pp. 082585971986554 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rebecca Antonacci ◽  
Sharon Baxter ◽  
J. David Henderson ◽  
Raza M. Mirza ◽  
Christopher A. Klinger

Background: With the legalization of medical assistance in dying (MAiD) in Canada, physicians and nurse practitioners now have another option within their scope of practice to consider alongside hospice palliative care (HPC) to support the patient and family regardless of their choice toward natural or medically assisted death. To elucidate insights and experiences with MAiD since its inception and to help adjust to this new end-of-life care environment, the membership of the Canadian Hospice Palliative Care Association (CHPCA) was surveyed. Methods: The CHPCA developed and distributed a 16-item survey to its membership in June 2017, one year following the legalization of MAiD. Data were arranged in Microsoft® Excel and open-ended responses were analyzed thematically using NVivo 12 software. Results: From across Canada, 452 responses were received (response rate: 15%). The majority of individuals worked as nurses (n = 161, 33%), administrators (n = 79, 16%), volunteers (n = 76, 16%) and physicians (n = 56, 11%). Almost 75% (n = 320) of all respondents indicated that they had experienced a patient in their program who had requested MAiD. Participants expressed dissatisfaction with the current psychological and professional support being provided by their health care organization and Ministry of Health - during and after the MAiD procedure. Conclusion: The new complexities of MAiD present unique challenges to those working in the health-care field. There needs to be an increased focus on educating/training providers as without proper support, health-care workers will be unable to perform to their full potential/scope of practice while also providing patients with holistic and accessible care.


2020 ◽  
Vol 21 (2) ◽  
pp. 56-59
Author(s):  
Michael J. Villeneuve

After years of heated debate about the issue, medical assistance in dying (MAiD) was legalized in Canada in 2016. Canada became the first jurisdiction where MAiD may be delivered by nurse practitioners as well as physicians. Experience has revealed significant public demand for the service, and Canadians expect nurses to advocate for safe, high-quality, ethical practice in this new area of care. Pesut et al. offer a superb analysis of the related Canadian nursing regulatory documents and the challenges in creating a harmonized approach that arise in a federation where the Criminal Code is a federal entity and the regulation of health care providers and delivery of care fall under provincial and territorial legislation. Organizations like the Canadian Nurses Association contribute to the development of good legislation by working with partners to present evidence to help legislators consider impacts on public health, health care, and providers. Nursing regulators across Canada responded quickly to the unfolding policy landscape as the federal legislation evolved and will face that task again: In February 2020, the federal government tabled legislation to relax conditions related to MAiD requests that will force regulators and professional associations back to public advocacy and legislative tables. The success of the cautious approach exercised by nursing bodies throughout this journey should continue to reassure Canadians that their high trust in the profession is well placed.


2019 ◽  
Vol 38 (03) ◽  
pp. 384-396 ◽  
Author(s):  
Laura Brooks

RÉSUMÉUne grande partie des écrits sur l’aide médicale à mourir (AMM) qui traite de la perspective des prestataires de soins de santé est centrée sur le rôle des médecins, et le point de vue des infirmières n’est exprimé que dans quelques-uns d’entre eux. Toutefois, quelques provinces canadiennes ont mis en œuvre des approches multidisciplinaires pour l’AMM. Il serait donc important de mieux comprendre l’expérience des divers prestataires de soins de santé impliqués dans l’AMM, considérant que les plans provinciaux liés à l’AMM sont encore en élaboration. Cet examen de la portée a pour but de résumer les publications qualitatives existantes axées sur l’expérience des prestataires de soins dans l’AMM. Les thèmes clés retrouvés dans ces publications concernent la complexité du processus d’AMM, l’importance des relations et de la communication, les rôles et dynamiques interprofessionnels et le processus d’adaptation. Les résultats de cet examen de la portée démontrent la nécessité de poursuivre la recherche sur les expériences des divers prestataires de l’AMM, particulièrement dans le contexte canadien.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document