Effect of enucleation procedures and maturation conditions on the development of nuclear-transferred rabbit oocytes receiving male fibroblast cells

Enucleated oocytes matured in vitro, from which chromosomes were removed by treatment with ionomycin and demecolcine, were used as recipient oocytes for nuclear transfer of fibroblast cells from a mature male rabbit. The enucleated oocytes with donor nuclei were electrically activated 2 h after fusion. The potential of nuclear-transferred oocytes matured in vitro and ovulated oocytes to develop into blastocysts was high (33-55%), except for oocytes cultured for 8.0 (19%) and 8.5 h (25%) in vitro. After transfer of nuclear-transferred oocytes to recipients, ten of 62 (16%) and one of eight (13%) recipients that received in vitro-matured and ovulated oocytes, respectively, had 19 (1%) and one (0.6%) implantation sites at the time of laparotomy on days 8-17 after transfer. Four fetuses, including two with beating hearts, were obtained on day 15 of gestation after transfer of nuclear-transferred oocytes matured in vitro. The reason for the low efficiency of fetus production was not clear. One possibility is chromosomal abnormalities of nuclear-transferred oocytes, as most (21 of 22) of the oocytes had chromosomes dispersed along the spindle fibre at the first cell cycle. This is the first report of successful production of fetuses after nuclear transfer of rabbit somatic cells.

Coordinated movements between autosomal half-bivalents in crane-fly spermatocytes: evidence that ‘stop’ signals are sent between partner half-bivalents

During anaphase-I in crane-fly spermatocytes, sister half-bivalents separate and move to opposite poles. When we irradiate a kinetochore spindle fibre with an ultraviolet microbeam, the associated half-bivalent temporarily stops moving and so does the partner half-bivalent with which it was paired during metaphase. To test whether a ‘signal’ is transmitted between partner half-bivalents we irradiated the spindle twice, once in the interzone (the region between separating partner half-bivalents) and once in a kinetochore fibre. For both irradiations we used light of wavelength 290 microns and a dose that, after irradiating a spindle fibre only, altered movement in 63% of irradiations (12/19); in 11 of the 12 cells both partner half-bivalents stopped moving after the irradiation. In control experiments we irradiated the interzone only: these irradiations generally did not stop chromosomal poleward motion but sometimes (14/29) caused poleward movement to each pole to be abruptly reduced to about half the velocity prior to irradiation. In double irradiation experiments we varied the order of the irradiations. In some double irradiation experiments we irradiated the interzonal region first and the spindle fibre second; in 75% (9/12) of the cells the half-bivalent associated with the irradiated fibre stopped moving while the partner half-bivalent moved normally, i.e. in 9/12 cells the interzonal irradiations uncoupled the movements of the partner half-bivalents. In other double irradiation experiments we irradiated the spindle fibre first and the interzone second: in 80% (4/5) of the cells the half-bivalents not associated with the irradiated spindle fibre resumed movement immediately after the irradiation while the other half-bivalent remained stopped. Interzonal irradiations therefore uncouple the poleward movements of sister half-bivalents and the uncoupling does not depend on the order of the irradiation. Our experiments suggest therefore that the irradiation of a spindle fibre causes negative (‘stop’) signals to be transmitted across the interzone and that irradiation of the interzone blocks the transmission of the stop signal.

Ultraviolet microbeam irradiation of chromosomal spindle fibres in Haemanthus katherinae endosperm. I. Behaviour of the irradiated region

We used an ultraviolet microbeam to irradiate chromosomal spindle fibres in metaphase Haemanthus endosperm cells. An area of reduced birefringence (ARB) was formed at the position of the focussed ultraviolet light with all wavelengths we used (260, 270, 280, and 290 nm). The chromosomal spindle fibre regions (kinetochore microtubules) poleward from the ARBs were unstable: they shortened (from the ARB to the pole) either too fast for us to measure or at rates of about 40 microns per minute. The chromosomal spindle fibre regions (kinetochore microtubules) kinetochore-ward from the ARBs were stable: they did not change length for about 80 seconds, and then they increased in length at rates of about 0.7 microns per minute. The lengthening chromosomal spindle fibres sometimes grew in a direction different from that of the original chromosomal spindle fibre. The chromosome associated with the irradiated spindle fibre sometimes moved off the equator a few micrometers, towards the non-irradiated half-spindle. We discuss our results in relation to other results in the literature and conclude that kinetochores and poles influence the behaviour of kinetochore microtubules.

Kinetochore function can be altered by ultraviolet microbeam irradiation without loss of the associated birefringent spindle fibre

We have irradiated kinetochores of chromosomes in spermatocytes of crane flies (Nephrotoma abbreviata (Loew)) and Nephrotoma suturalis (Loew), while observing the cells using polarization microscopy. Irradiation of a kinetochore of one sex chromosome with 0.106 ergs microns-2, the minimum dose needed to stop movement, had no effect on the birefringence of the irradiated kinetochore's spindle fibre. Irradiation of the kinetochore of an autosomal half-bivalent in anaphase, with the same dose, had no effect on the birefringence of the irradiated kinetochore's spindle fibre, but nonetheless the anaphase movements of all six autosomal half-bivalents were stopped, temporarily, for up to 20 min. Irradiations of the kinetochores of an autosomal half-bivalent with higher doses (0.301 ergs microns-2) caused loss of birefringence of the irradiated kinetochore's spindle fibre, and the movements of all six autosomal half-bivalents were stopped permanently. We argue that the ultraviolet microbeam differentially affects two functions of the kinetochore: (1) a ‘signalling’ function, and (2) microtubule attachment, with the signalling function being altered at doses lower than that of microtubule attachment.

Ultraviolet microbeam irradiation of chromosomal spindle fibres shears microtubules and permits study of the new free ends in vivo

Irradiation of birefringent chromosomal spindle fibres in crane-fly spermatocytes in metaphase I or anaphase I produces an area of reduced birefringence (ARB) on the fibre. This ARB moves poleward and is lost at the pole. Ultrastructural and immunofluorescence analysis of ARBs obtained by irradiation with monochromatic ultraviolet light of wavelength 260 nm shows that the microtubules in the irradiated area are depolymerized, though the rest of the spindle appears unaffected. The area of microtubule depolymerization moves poleward with the ARB, and once the ARB reaches the pole the irradiated half-spindle appears normal. The motion of the ARB, therefore, appears to be due to the behaviour of the sheared microtubules in the chromosomal spindle fibre. The relative stability of the sheared microtubules shows that chromosomal fibre microtubules are not dynamically unstable, as are microtubules under certain conditions in vitro. However, ARB motion may be due to a moderated version of dynamic instability. Possible models for ARB motion are discussed.

Sex-chromosome anaphase movements in crane-fly spermatocytes are coordinated: ultraviolet microbeam irradiation of one kinetochore of one sex chromosome blocks the movements of both sex chromosomes

Sex chromosomes in crane-fly spermatocytes move polewards at anaphase after the autosomes have reached the poles. In Nephrotoma abbreviate the sex chromosomes are 8 μm long by 3.5 μm wide and have two orientations when they move: the long axis of the sex chromosome is either perpendicular or parallel to the spindle axis. We assume (1) that when a sex chromosome is perpendicular to the spindle axis it has a chromosomal spindle fibre to each pole, one from each kinetochore, as in other species; and (2) that when a sex chromosome is parallel to the spindle axis each kinetochore has spindle fibres to both poles, i.e. that the latter sex chromosomes are maloriented. We irradiated one kinetochore of one sex chromosome using an ultraviolet microbeam. When both sex chromosomes were normally oriented, irradiation of a single kinetochore permanently blocked movement of both sex chromosomes. Irradiation of non-kinetochore chromosomal regions or of spindle fibres did not block movement, or blocked movement only temporarily. We argue that ultraviolet irradiation of one kinetochore blocks movement of both sex chromosomes because of effects on a ‘signal’ system. The results were different when one sex chromosome was maloriented. Irradiation of one kinetochore of a maloriented sex chromosome did not block motion of either sex chromosome. On the other hand, irradiation of one kinetochore of a normally oriented sex chromosome permanently blocked motion of both that sex chromosome and the maloriented sex chromosome. We argue that for the signal system to allow the sex chromosomes to move to the pole each sex chromosome must have one spindle fibre to each pole.

The kinetic polarities of spindle microtubules in vivo, in crane-fly spermatocytes. II. Kinetochore microtubules in non-treated spindles

We determined the kinetic polarities of chromosomal spindle fibre microtubules in vivo: either the kinetochore or pole ends of chromosomal spindle fibres were irradiated with near-ultraviolet light to prevent depolymerization by colcemid. Irradiations began either just before or just after colcemid addition; cells were continually irradiated and continuously immersed in colcemid. Irradiations of kinetochore ends of chromosomal spindle fibres prevented depolymerization; irradiations of pole ends did not. Therefore, since colcemid acts by binding to the ‘on’ (assembly) ends of microtubules, the on ends of chromosomal spindle fibre microtubules are at the kinetochores. That is, in untreated chromosomal spindle fibres in vivo tubulin monomers add to kinetochore microtubules at the kinetochore ends. Tubulin diffused from the irradiation sites: irradiations of the cytoplasm sometimes prevented depolymerization of chromosomal spindle fibres. Prevention of chromosomal spindle fibre depolymerization was dependent on the distance of the irradiated region from the nearest chromosome; the longer the distance the less likely was it that the irradiation prevented depolymerization. On the other hand, prevention of chromosomal spindle fibre depolymerization was not dependent on the distance from the irradiated spot to the nearer pole. This analysis, too, we argue, strongly suggests that the kinetochore ends of the chromosomal spindle fibres are the on ends.

Intergeneric hybrids of Hordeum vulgare with Agropyron caninum and A. dasystachyum

Hybrids were obtained by pollinating Hordeum vulgare cv. Betzes with Agropyron caninum (4x) and A. dasystachyum (4x) at frequencies of 1.4 and 6.1% of pollinated florets, respectively. The hybrids were sterile and phenotypically resembled the paternal parent, except for floret structure which was intermediate between the parental types. Chromosome pairing at meiosis was very low and thus provided no indication of homoeology between parental genomes. Abnormal meiotic chromosome behavior in meiocytes that occurred in sectors on the 'Betzes' × A. dasystachyum hybrid was attributed to abnormal spindle fibre function.Key words: intergeneric hybrids, Hordeum vulgare, Agropyron caninum, Agropyron dasystachyum.

Does actin produce the force that moves a chromosome to the pole during anaphase?

Chromosomes move towards spindle poles because of force produced by chromosomal spindle fibres. I argue that actin is involved in producing this force. Actin is present in chromosomal spindle fibres, with consistent polarity. Physiological experiments using ultraviolet microbeam irradiations suggest that the force is due to an actin and myosin (or myosin-equivalent) system. Other physiological experiments (using inhibitors in "leaky" cells or antibodies injected into cells) that on the face of it would seem to rule out actin and myosin on closer scrutiny do not really do so at all. I argue that in vivo the "on" ends of chromosomal spindle fibre microtubules are at the kinetochores; I discuss the apparent contradiction between this conclusion and those from experiments on microtubules in vitro. From what we know of treadmilling in microtubules in vitro, the poleward movements of irradiation-induced areas of reduced birefringence (arb) can not be explained as treadmilling of microtubules: additional assumptions need to be made for arb movements toward the pole to be due to treadmilling. If arb movement does indeed represent treadmilling along chromosomal spindle fibre microtubules, treadmilling continues throughout anaphase. Thus I suggest that chromosomal spindle fibres shorten in anaphase not because polymerization is stopped at the kinetochore (the on end), as previously assumed, but rather because there is increased depolymerization at the pole (the "off" end).