calypte anna
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

54
(FIVE YEARS 9)

H-INDEX

19
(FIVE YEARS 2)

PeerJ ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 9 ◽  
pp. e11131
Author(s):  
Pranav S. Pandit ◽  
Ruta R. Bandivadekar ◽  
Christine K. Johnson ◽  
Nicole Mikoni ◽  
Michelle Mah ◽  
...  

Background Hummingbirds are frequently presented to California wildlife rehabilitation centers for medical care, accounting for approximately 5% of overall admissions. Age, sex, and reason for admission could impact hummingbird survivability, therefore identification of these factors could help maximize rehabilitation efforts. Methods Mixed-effects logistic regression models were used to identify specific threats to the survival of 6908 hummingbirds (1645 nestlings and 5263 non-nestlings) consisting of five species (Calypte anna, Calypte costa, Selasphorus rufus, Selasphorus sasin, Archilochus alexandri), found in urban settings, and admitted to California wildlife rehabilitation centers over 26 years. Results In total, 36% of birds survived and were transferred to flight cage facilities for further rehabilitation and/or release. Nestlings were more likely to be transferred and/or released compared to adult hummingbirds. After accounting for age, birds rescued in spring and summer were twice as likely to be released compared to birds rescued in the fall. A high number of nestlings were presented to the rehabilitation centers during spring, which coincides with the nesting season for hummingbirds in California, with the lowest number of nestlings presented in fall. Reasons for presentation to rehabilitation centers included several anthropogenic factors such as window collisions (9.6%) and interactions with domesticated animals (12.9%). Survival odds were lower if a hummingbird was rescued in a “torpor-like state” and were higher if rescued for “nest-related” reasons. Evaluation of treatment regimens administered at wildlife rehabilitation centers identified supportive care, including providing commercial nutrient-rich nectar plus solution, to significantly increase hummingbird survivability. Discussion Our results provide evidence of threats to hummingbirds in urban habitats, based on reasons for rescue and presentation to rehabilitation centers. Reasons for hummingbird admissions to three California wildlife rehabilitation centers were anthropogenic in nature (i.e., being associated with domestic animals, window collisions, and found inside a man-made structure) and constituted 25% of total admissions. There was a clear indication that supportive care, such as feeding a commercial nectar solution, and medical treatment significantly increased the odds of survival for rescued hummingbirds.


Western Birds ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 52 (1) ◽  
pp. 58-67
Author(s):  
Jessica J. Pollock ◽  
Heidi Ware Carlisle ◽  
Heather M. Hayes ◽  
Bryce W. Robinson

Increased urbanization and supplementary feeding are implicated in driving the expansion of the range of the Anna’s Hummingbird (Calypte anna). In many areas this range expansion has been well described, but the recent expansion of the northeastern limit of the nonbreeding distribution, in winter in Idaho, has not yet been summarized. Using data from the Idaho Bird Records Committee database and www.eBird.org from 1976 through 2020, we collated records for Idaho and supplemented them with data from a community-science program of monitoring by homeowners. Our additional effort to solicit records from the community shows that database records and feeder observations alone underestimate the number of individuals present in the state. Through banding and color-marking of 58 individual hummingbirds at private residences, we documented six instances of Anna’s Hummingbirds returning to a site in successive winters, found a roughly even sex ratio, and found a ratio of adults to juveniles of about 3:1. Anna’s Hummingbird may now be a sparse year-round resident in parts of Idaho.


2020 ◽  
Vol 7 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stephanie M. Diao ◽  
Robert H. Poppenga ◽  
Gwendolyne Gonzales Alarcio ◽  
Janet E. Foley ◽  
Ruta R. Bandivadekar ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  

PLoS ONE ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 15 (6) ◽  
pp. e0234239
Author(s):  
Andrea M. DeRogatis ◽  
Leilani V. Nguyen ◽  
Ruta R. Bandivadekar ◽  
Kirk C. Klasing ◽  
Lisa A. Tell

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christopher J. Clark ◽  
Stephen M. Russell
Keyword(s):  

2019 ◽  
Vol 92 (5) ◽  
pp. 481-495 ◽  
Author(s):  
Benjamin Goller ◽  
Tyee K. Fellows ◽  
Roslyn Dakin ◽  
Luke Tyrrell ◽  
Esteban Fernández-Juricic ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 527 (16) ◽  
pp. 2644-2658
Author(s):  
Andrea H. Gaede ◽  
Cristian Gutierrez‐Ibanez ◽  
Melissa S. Armstrong ◽  
Douglas L. Altshuler ◽  
Douglas R. Wylie

2019 ◽  
Vol 222 (3) ◽  
pp. jeb176263 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marc A. Badger ◽  
Hao Wang ◽  
Robert Dudley
Keyword(s):  

2018 ◽  
Vol 204 (12) ◽  
pp. 965-975 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marco A. Giraldo ◽  
Juan L. Parra ◽  
Doekele G. Stavenga
Keyword(s):  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document