Continuous B- to A- Transition in Protein-DNA Binding - How Well Is It Described by Current AMBER Force Fields?

When DNA interacts with a protein, its structure often undergoes significant conformational adaptation. Perhaps the most common is the transition from canonical B-DNA towards the A-DNA form, which is not a two-state, but rather a continuous transition. The A- and B- forms differ mainly in sugar pucker P (north/south) and glycosidic torsion χ (high-anti/anti). The combination of A-like P and B-like χ (and vice versa) represents the nature of the intermediate states lying between the pure A- and B- forms. In this work, we study how the A/B equilibrium and in particular the A/B intermediate states, which are known to be over-represented at protein-DNA interfaces, are modeled by current AMBER force fields. Eight protein-DNA complexes and their naked (unbound) DNAs were simulated with OL15 and bsc1 force fields as well as an experimental combination OL15χOL3. We found that while the geometries of the A-like intermediate states in the molecular dynamics (MD) simulations agree well with the native X-ray geometries found in the protein-DNA complexes, their populations (stabilities) are significantly underestimated. Different force fields predict different propensities for A-like states growing in the order OL15 < bsc1 < OL15χOL3, but the overall populations of the A-like form are too low in all of them. Interestingly, the force fields seem to predict the correct sequence-dependent A-form propensity, as they predict larger populations of the A-like form in naked (unbound) DNA in those steps that acquire A-like conformations in protein-DNA complexes. The instability of A-like geometries in current force fields may significantly alter the geometry of the simulated protein-DNA complex, destabilize the binding motif, and reduce the binding energy, suggesting that refinement is needed to improve description of protein-DNA interactions in AMBER force fields.

A General Picture of Cucurbit[8]uril Host-Guest Binding: Recalibrating Bonded Interactions

Atomic-level understanding of the dynamical feature of host-guest interactions remains a central challenge in supramolecular chemistry. The remarkable guest binding behavior of the Cucurbiturils family of supramolecular containers makes them promising drug carriers. Among Cucurbit[n]urils, Cucurbit[8]uril (CB8) has intermediate portal size and cavity volume. It can exploit almost all host-guest recognition motifs formed by this host family. In our previous work, an extensive computational investigation of the binding of 7 commonly abused and structurally diverse drugs to the CB8 host was performed and a general dynamical binding picture of CB8-guest interactions was obtained. Further, two widely used fixed-charge models for drug-like molecules were investigated and compared in great detail, aiming at providing guidelines in choosing an appropriate charge scheme in host-guest modelling. Iterative refitting of atomic charges leads to improved binding thermodynamics and the best root-mean-squared deviation from the experimental reference is 2.6 kcal/mol. In this work, we focus on a thorough evaluation of the remaining parts of classical force fields, i.e., the bonded interactions. The widely used general Amber force fields are assessed and refitted to improve the intra-molecular conformational preference and thus the description of inter-molecular host-guest interactions. The interaction pattern and binding thermodynamics show significant dependence on the modelling parameters. The refitted system-specific parameter set improves the consistency of the modelling results and the experimental reference significantly. Finally, combining the previous charge-scheme comparison and the current force-field refitting, we provide general guidelines for the theoretical modelling of host-guest binding.

Z-DNA as a Touchstone for Additive Empirical Force Fields and a Refinement of the Alpha/Gamma DNA torsions for AMBER

Although current AMBER force fields are relatively accurate for canonical B-DNA, many non-canonical structures are still described incorrectly. As non-canonical motifs are attracting increasing attention due to the role they play in living organisms, further improvement is desirable. Here, we have chosen Z-DNA molecule, can be considered a touchstone of the universality of empirical force fields, since the non-canonical α and γ backbone conformations native to Z-DNA are also found in protein-DNA complexes, i-motif DNA and other non-canonical DNAs. We show that spurious α/γ conformations occurring in simulations with current AMBER force fields, OL15 and bsc1, are largely due to inaccurate α/γ parameterization. Moreover, stabilization of native Z-DNA substates involving γ = trans conformations appears to be in conflict with the correct description of the canonical B-DNA structure. Because the balance of the native and spurious conformations is influenced by non-additive effects, this is a difficult case for an additive dihedral energy scheme such as AMBER. We propose new α/γ parameters, denoted OL21, and show that they improve the stability of native α/γ Z-DNA substates while keeping the canonical DNA description virtually unchanged, and thus represent a reasonable compromise within the additive force field framework. Although further extensive testing is needed, the new modification appears to be a promising step towards a more reliable description of non-canonical DNA motifs and provides the best performance for Z-DNA molecules among current AMBER force fields.

Comprehensive evaluation of the MM-GBSA method on bromodomain-inhibitor sets

MM-PB/GBSA methods represent a higher-level scoring theory than docking. This study reports an extensive testing of different MM-GBSA scoring schemes on two bromodomain (BRD) datasets. The first set is composed of 24 BRPF1 complexes, and the second one is a nonredundant set constructed from the PDBbind and composed of 28 diverse BRD complexes. A variety of MM-GBSA schemes were analyzed to evaluate the performance of four protocols with different numbers of minimization and MD steps, 10 different force fields and three different water models. Results showed that neither additional MD steps nor unfixing the receptor atoms improved scoring or ranking power. On the contrary, our results underscore the advantage of fixing receptor atoms or limiting the number of MD steps not only for a reduction in the computational costs but also for boosting the prediction accuracy. Among Amber force fields tested, ff14SB and its derivatives rather than ff94 or polarized force fields provided the most accurate scoring and ranking results. The TIP3P water model yielded the highest scoring and ranking power compared to the others. Posing power was further evaluated for the BRPF1 set. A slightly better posing power for the protocol which uses both minimization and MD steps with a fixed receptor than the one which uses only minimization with a fully flexible receptor-ligand system was observed. Overall, this study provides insights into the usage of the MM-GBSA methods for screening of BRD inhibitors, substantiating the benefits of shorter protocols and latest force fields and maintaining the crystal waters for accuracy.

Thermodynamics of Helix formation in small peptides of varying lengthin vacuo, implicit solvent and explicit solvent: Comparison between AMBER force fields

Helix formation is of great significance in protein folding. The helix-forming tendencies of amino acids are accumulated along the sequence to determine the helix-forming tendency of peptides. Computer simulation can be used to model this process in atomic details and give structural insights. In the current work, we employ equilibrate-state free energy simulation to systematically study the folding/unfolding thermodynamics of a series of mutated peptides. Two AMBER force fields including AMBER99SB and AMBER14SB are compared. The new 14SB force field uses refitted torsion parameters compared with 99SB and they share the same atomic charge scheme. We find that in vacuo the helix formation is mutation dependent, which reflects the different helix propensities of different amino acids. In general, there are helix formers, helix indifferent groups and helix breakers. The helical structure becomes more favored when the length of the sequence becomes longer, which arises from the formation of additional backbone hydrogen bonds in the lengthened sequence. Therefore, the helix indifferent groups and helix breakers will become helix formers in long sequences. Also, protonation-dependent helix formation is observed for ionizable groups. In 14SB, the helical structures are more stable than in 99SB and differences can be observed in their grouping schemes, especially in the helix indifferent group. In solvents, all mutations are helix indifferent due to protein–solvent interactions. The decrease in the number of backbone hydrogen bonds is the same with the increase in the number of protein–water hydrogen bonds. The 14SB in explicit solvent is able to capture the free energy minima in the helical state while 14SB in implicit solvent, 99SB in explicit solvent and 99SB in implicit solvent cannot. The helix propensities calculated under 14SB agree with the corresponding experimental values, while the 99SB results obviously deviate from the references. Hence, implicit solvent models are unable to correctly describe the thermodynamics even for the simple helix formation in isolated peptides. Well-developed force fields and explicit solvents are needed to correctly describe the protein dynamics. Aside from the free energy, differences in conformational ensemble under different force fields in different solvent models are observed. The numbers of hydrogen bonds formed under different force fields agree and they are mostly determined by the solvent model.