cardiac modeling
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

41
(FIVE YEARS 9)

H-INDEX

5
(FIVE YEARS 1)

2021 ◽  
Vol 12 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lv Tong ◽  
Caiming Zhao ◽  
Zhenyin Fu ◽  
Ruiqing Dong ◽  
Zhenghong Wu ◽  
...  

Personalized cardiac modeling is widely used for studying the mechanisms of cardiac arrythmias. Due to the high demanding of computational resource of modeling, the arrhythmias induced in the models are usually simulated for just a few seconds. In clinic, it is common that arrhythmias last for more than several minutes and the morphologies of reentries are not always stable, so it is not clear that whether the simulation of arrythmias for just a few seconds is long enough to match the arrhythmias detected in patients. This study aimed to observe how long simulation of the induced arrhythmias in the personalized cardiac models is sufficient to match the arrhythmias detected in patients. A total of 5 contrast enhanced MRI datasets of patient hearts with myocardial infarction were used in this study. Then, a classification method based on Gaussian mixture model was used to detect the infarct tissue. For each reentry, 3 s and 10 s were simulated. The characteristics of each reentry simulated for different duration were studied. Reentries were induced in all 5 ventricular models and sustained reentries were induced at 39 stimulation sites in the model. By analyzing the simulation results, we found that 41% of the sustained reentries in the 3 s simulation group terminated in the longer simulation groups (10 s). The second finding in our simulation was that only 23.1% of the sustained reentries in the 3 s simulation did not change location and morphology in the extended 10 s simulation. The third finding was that 35.9% reentries were stable in the 3 s simulation and should be extended for the simulation time. The fourth finding was that the simulation results in 10 s simulation matched better with the clinical measurements than the 3 s simulation. It was shown that 10 s simulation was sufficient to make simulation results stable. The findings of this study not only improve the simulation accuracy, but also reduce the unnecessary simulation time to achieve the optimal use of computer resources to improve the simulation efficiency and shorten the simulation time to meet the time node requirements of clinical operation on patients.


Author(s):  
Masahiro Nakano ◽  
Ryohei Shibue ◽  
Kunio Kashino ◽  
Shingo Tsukada ◽  
Hitonobu Tomoike

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
pp. 449
Author(s):  
Honglei Zhu ◽  
Lian Jin ◽  
Yanqi Huang ◽  
Xiaomei Wu

This manuscript adopted the cardiac modeling and simulation method to study the problems of physiological pacing in clinical application. A multiscale rabbit ventricular electrophysiological model was constructed. We simulated His-bundle pacing (HBP) treatment for left bundle branch block (LBBB) and atrioventricular block (AVB), and left bundle branch pacing (LBBP) treatment for LBBB by setting various moments of the stimulus. The synthetic ECGs and detailed electrical activities were analyzed. Our electrophysiological model accurately simulated the normal state, HBP, and LBBP. The synthetic ECG showed that QRS duration was narrowed by 30% after HBP correction for LBBB. For LBBB correction with LBBP, the synthetic ECGs of LBBP starting before 30 ms (if the end of atrial excitation is set as 0 ms) presented right bundle branch block (RBBB), and those of LBBP starting at 30–38 ms were synchronous, while those of LBBP starting after 42 ms possessed LBBB morphologies. The best pacing results were obtained when LBBP started at 34 ms. This manuscript verified the feasibility of the constructed ventricular model, and studied the physiological pacing mechanism. The results showed that HBP realized correction for AVB and high LBBB. The performance of LBBP can be improved by applying the stimulus within a specific period of time (0–8 ms) after atrial excitation.


Author(s):  
Rebecca Waugh ◽  
Mohamed Abdelghafar Hussein ◽  
Jamie Weller ◽  
Kavita Sharma ◽  
Gerald Greil ◽  
...  

SoftwareX ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 11 ◽  
pp. 100454
Author(s):  
Aurel Neic ◽  
Matthias A.F. Gsell ◽  
Elias Karabelas ◽  
Anton J. Prassl ◽  
Gernot Plank

2019 ◽  
Vol 10 (4) ◽  
pp. 553-567 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joshua Mineroff ◽  
Andrew D. McCulloch ◽  
David Krummen ◽  
Baskar Ganapathysubramanian ◽  
Adarsh Krishnamurthy

Author(s):  
Edward Vigmond ◽  
Gernot Plank
Keyword(s):  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document