Effect of traditional versus site specific anterior repair in reduction of urinary symptoms in women with pelvic organ prolapse

The present study was undertaken to evaluate effect of traditional anterior repair versus site specific anterior repair in reduction of urinary symptoms in women with Pelvic organ Prolapse. During the study period of 2 years 140 women belonging to reproductive, peri-menopausal and postmenopausal age groups were included in the study. Employing past literature, the sample size calculated was 140. All women were assessed pre-operatively by the assessment method – Pelvic organ prolapse quantification (POP-Q) system. 70 women belonging to Group A were treated according to vaginal hysterectomy with traditional anterior repair and 70 women belonged to Group B who were treated according to vaginal hysterectomy with site specific anterior repair.Post-operatively, all women were followed up till 7th post-operative day and were assessed for anatomical and functional improvement to determine a better method for repair in reduction of urinary symptoms in women with pelvic organ prolapse.Our study shows functional and anatomical outcomes of traditional anterior repair and site specific anterior repair. 48 of 70 women (68.2%) who were subjected to traditional anterior repair and 52 of 70 women (73.4%) who were subjected to site specific anterior repair had marked functional improvement after surgery. 58 of 70 women (83.2%) belonging to traditional anterior repair group and 67 of 70women (95.3%) belonging to Site specific anterior repair group had considerable anatomical improvement post-operatively. This impresses the role of site specific anterior repair in women with pelvic organ prolapse for attaining better functional and anatomical outcome.

VP019 TESAR - TOTALLY ENDOSCOPIC SUBLAY ANTERIOR REPAIR - IN MIDLINE DEFECTS REPAIR

Aim In recent years, many minimally invasive techniques have been presented in abdominall wall repair. Since 2018 we have been using TESAR techinque, an anterior endoscopic approach with mesh sublay, published in 2019 from our group. Material and Methods From May 2018 to May 2021 58 Patients referred to our Unit for clinical and radiological diagnosis of ventral defect (Midline hernia, Incisional hernia, Diastasis Recti>5 cm). Exclusion criteria were: maximum defeact width 8 cm, and contraindications to general anesthesia Results All the patients underwent midline repair with TESAR technique. Three TAR were performed, with defect of 8 cm width previously treated with botox. No conversion to laparotomy occured, no intraoperative complications were registered. Total mean operative time was 156 +- 21,5 min. No postoperative major complications, 3 subcoutaneous seromas occurred ,all treated conservatively. The mean Hospital stay was 2.7 + 0.8 days. Conclusions TESAR is a feasible technique for extraperitoneal repair of midline defects with a totally endoscopic approach, allowing a safe repair with good outcomes in terms of resolutions of symtoms and postoperative complications. The video shows the main steps of the technique in diastasis recti and complicated ventral hernia repair.

P076 DIFFERENT SURGICAL APPROACH IN DIASTASIS RECTI REPAIR: IMPORTANCE OF AN OVERALL VIEW OF THE DISEASE

Aim Diastasis Recti (DR) is characterized by a defect of the linea alba sometimes associated with midline hernias, and frequent lipocutaneous excess. We present our experience in the treatment of diastasis recti with Inter Recti Distance (IRD) > 50mm -with or without umbilical hernia- by 3 different approaches. Material and Methods From January 2018 to February 2020, 104 patients were referred to our unit for clinical and radiological diagnosis of DR with IRD > 50 mm. Three different surgical approaches were used, based on presence of lipocoutaneous excess: laparoabdominoplasty, laparominiabdominoplasty and minimally-invasive/endoscopic with Totally Sublay Anterior Repair (TESAR) approach. Results We performed 28 TESAR (29.8%), 44 laparoabdominoplasties (42.3%) and 32 laparominiabdominoplasties (30.8%). Overall complication rate was 26% (27 patients). In 3 (2.9%) cases major surgical complications (Clavien-Dindo 3-4) occurred, all for open operations. Minor complications (Clavien-Dindo 1-2) included: 13 cutaneous ischemia, 10 small muscular hematomas and 1 subcutaneous seroma. The overall median post-operative stay was 3 days (range 2 – 14 days), and 3, 4 and 3 days for TESAR, laparoabdominoplasty and laparominiabdominoplasty groups, respectively. No recurrence registered to date. Conclusions Our experience shows the importance of an overall view of the functional and cosmetic impairment created by the DR. The surgeon must obtain an optimal functional outcome also aiming for the best cosmetic result. Therefore different approaches have to be considered, tailored to the clinical, instrumental and psychological aspects of the disease. The complication rate, while in line with the literature, emphasize how in this type of operation the critical issues of functional as well as morphological surgery coexist.

Postoperative Urinary Retention after Pelvic Organ Prolapse Surgery – Influence of Peri-operative Factors and Trial of Void Protocol

PurposeTransient postoperative urinary retention (POUR) is common after pelvic floor surgery. We aimed to determine the association between peri-operative variables and POUR and to determine the number of voids required for post-void residuals (PVRs) to normalize postoperatively. MethodsWe conducted a retrospective cohort study of 992 patients undergoing pelvic floor surgery at a tertiary referral centre from January 2015-October 2017. Variables assessed included: age, BMI, ASA score, anaesthesia type, type of surgery, length of postoperative stay, surgeon, bladder protocol used, and number of PVRs required to “pass” the protocol. Results Significant risk factors for POUR included: placement of MUS during POP surgery, anterior repair and hysterectomy with concomitant sacrospinous vault suspension.A total of 25.1% were discharged requiring catheterization. Patients receiving a concomitant mid-urethral sling (MUS) were 2.2 (95% CI:1.6-2.9) and 2.3 (95% CI:1.8-3.1) times more likely to have elevated PVR after their second TOV and third TOV (P<0.0001), respectively, compared with those without concomitant MUS. Permitting a third TOV allowed an additional 10% of women to pass the voiding protocol before discharge. The median number of voids to pass protocol was 2. An ASA>2 and placement of MUS were associated with increasing number of voids needed to pass protocol. ConclusionsWhile many women passed protocol by the second void, using the 3rd void as a cut point to determine success would result in fewer women requiring catheterization after discharge. Prior to pelvic floor surgery, women should be counselled regarding POUR probability to allow for management of postoperative expectations.

Pelvic Organ Prolapse Repair with Mesh: Description of Surgical Technique Using the Surelift® Anterior Repair System

<b><i>Introduction:</i></b> Although the use of transvaginal mesh (TVM) in the repair of pelvic organ prolapse (POP) has been restricted, there are still some cases in which TVM may be the most appropriate approach. The TVM Surelift® anterior repair surgical technique has not been described previously. <b><i>Objective:</i></b> The aim of this study was to describe the surgical technique and to report our preliminary results regarding efficacy and complications. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> A step-by-step description of surgical technique is presented. A descriptive retrospective analysis was performed to evaluate our preliminary results in 17 women who underwent POP repair using the Surelift® anterior repair system in our department between 2014 and 2017. TVM was offered to patients with symptomatic apical (primary or recurrent) or recurrent anterior POP stage ≥2. POP recurrence was classified as asymptomatic anatomic or symptomatic. Patients rated satisfaction with surgery on a scale from 0 to 10. Complications during follow-up were classified according to the International Urogynecological Association/International Continence Society recommendations. <b><i>Results:</i></b> Median (IQR) follow-up was 19.9 months (24.8). Two (11.8%) anatomic recurrences were identified, both symptomatic, but neither required further surgery. No cases of pelvic pain, dyspareunia, voiding, or defecatory dysfunction were detected. Two (11.8%) patients presented a &#x3c;1-cm vaginal mesh exposure (2AaT3S2) requiring partial mesh removal through a vaginal approach. At the end of follow-up, median satisfaction (IQR) with the surgery was 9 (3.1). <b><i>Conclusion:</i></b> The Surelift® anterior repair system is effective in correcting apical or recurrent anterior POP, with a high patient satisfaction rate. Complications after this surgery are infrequent and are mostly related to vaginal mesh exposure.

Surgical technique used in the UK for native tissue anterior pelvic organ prolapse repair (VaST)

Introduction The PROSPECT study found that outcomes for native tissue and mesh prolapse repairs are similar but mesh repairs have a 10% risk of exposure. The current UK surgical mesh pause has led to renewed interest in native tissue surgery. Previous studies of native tissue anterior repair surgical techniques have been limited by the questionnaire study design. The objective of this study was to describe and categorise native tissue anterior repair surgical techniques. Methods This prospective qualitative study used a purposive sampling strategy to recruit surgeons. Data were collected through video-recorded observations of surgery, audio-recorded interviews with surgeons and field notes. The study took place in urogynaecology theatres in 21 UK centres. Thematic analysis was performed using computer-based software and themes of surgical technique were developed. Results Thirty consultant surgeons were recruited. In all steps of the anterior repair procedure, infiltration, dissection, method of fascial repair, type and method of suturing and suture placement, surgical technique varied between surgeons. The filming of surgery followed by immediate validation with the surgeons gave greater insight. Surgeons’ terminology to describe techniques varied and the investigators' opinions of the techniques performed were not always consistent with the surgeons' descriptions. The concept of fascia in histological terms was not uniform amongst surgeons. Conclusion VaST has demonstrated significant variation in native tissue anterior repair surgical techniques and inconsistency in the terminology used to describe them. These inconsistencies may prevent future meaningful research of prolapse surgery. The variation in technique could affect surgical outcomes and this should be explored further.