3578 Partnership Development: A learning community to advance institutional responsiveness to the opioid crisis in the city of Detroit and Wayne, County, Michigan

OBJECTIVES/SPECIFIC AIMS: Facilitate relationships and partnership development to address the opioid crisis in Detroit and Wayne County Contribute to real-time conversations on opioid epidemic policy and practice to identify and build consensus on research questions Apply findings from each learning community session to policy briefs to better inform policymakers, providers and consumers; and advocate for institutional responsiveness METHODS/STUDY POPULATION: The study population utilizes a purposive sampling approach to intentionally organize relationships and partnership development. For example, participants registered for the December 2018 session, “Detroit/Wayne County Opioid Crisis Learning Community Series: Data Session,” include representation from school-based health clinics, community and faith-based organizations, health systems, city and county level public health, addiction/recovery organizations, law enforcement, academia and citizens. The team feels this approach ensures and builds diverse, team science perspectives and regional collaboration. The Detroit Area Mental Health Leadership Team formed in 2015 at a retreat held by the University of Michigan’s Clinical and Translational Science Initiative attended by nearly 100 community-academic partners. Mental health, stigma and suicide were identified as community priorities by participants who attended the summit. A mental health workgroup formed and later expanded its membership to strengthen diverse perspectives. The team immediately designed and administered a survey amongst its partners creating the following priorities and focus: substance abuse interventions, healthcare access, and consumer awareness of mental health issues/available resources. Since data, policy and service are common threads to design interventions, the partnership decided to facilitate dialogue and discussion from the community on special topics related to the crisis, and share the community’s recommendations on how to address them. The learning community series was designed as a bi-lingual format for sharing and expression. Deliberative democracy encourages inclusion of voices, interests and opinions often not heard or included in decision-making processes; driving the project’s purposive sampling approach. Institutional responsiveness and advocacy for adoption of the community’s recommendations will occur through strategic policy briefs summarizing each learning community session and the entire series. A dissemination plan will be utilized to encourage the policy briefs reach appropriate audiences for capacity building and institutional responsiveness. The learning community series will provide 5 sessions on data (impacting adolescents, emerging adults, and 20-mid 30 year-old adults), recovery/law enforcement, prescribing, and marijuana. The session topics arose from earlier assessment conducted by the Detroit Area Mental Health Leadership Team. RESULTS/ANTICIPATED RESULTS: A response to the opioid crisis should address community priorities identified through data, research and community input. Community providers should have access to real-time data and research to develop appropriate interventions and institutional responsiveness. Equally important is the need for legislators and others impacting resource allocation to hear from the community on priorities they feel should be addressed, and to better understand the need for new types of data and information to drive service delivery, policy and resources to address the crisis. The learning community series will focus on describing the epidemic and building infrastructure to collaborate, and share data and information to strengthen advocacy and responsiveness to address the crisis. We feel this will enable more efficient programming to strengthen service delivery that captures life experiences from those who directly interface with individuals impacted by the crisis. DISCUSSION/SIGNIFICANCE OF IMPACT: There is limited knowledge and consensus on types of data and information to effectively describe the opioid crisis. For example, data and information connecting gateway drugs such as marijuana with more hardcore drugs (i.e., opioids and heroin) is not available; community-based providers have limited access to what research says about the crisis; and local public and community providers are dependent upon the state for surveillance data. Individuals dealing with addiction and recovery often need immediate attention. A gap in access to services exists depending on types of insurance. For example, Medicaid and some HMOs require an assessment before clients can seek treatment, resulting in uncompensated care among providers to immediately address patients need. Access to healthcare is a longstanding issue in medically underserved communities. The impact of the crisis varies geographically in communities and regions due to cultural and ethnic differences, yet data and information on these differences is not readily available. Cultural competency and sensitivity is often an issue in medically underserved areas because stakeholders may feel professionals providing services do not relate to them effectively. Finally, the community does not understand the economic impact of the crisis. These issues make it difficult for community advocates and providers to work with elected officials, providers and others on the opioid crisis because they do not have the data and informed required to effectively flush out a hypothesis and form solutions. Information captured in the learning community series (i.e., presentations by experts, facilitated discussion and personal testimony) will be summarized in a policy brief after each session and the entire series. Recommendations and priorities from the community will be shared with providers, policymakers, the business community, consumers and others to provide community input on problem solving approaches, new interventions, types of data not currently available that should be captured, and other important strategies and information to address the crisis. This information will also encourage designing research questions to guide developing new community engaged and community based participatory research to address the crisis. Finally, utilizing a purposive approach in participant recruitment will encourage partnership development from a team science and capacity building perspective.

The Conditional Effectiveness of Legislative Threats: How Court Curbing Alters the Behavior of (Some) Supreme Court Justices

The separation-of-powers literature focuses on how the preferences of one branch constrain the behavior of its counterparts. Yet, in much of this work, scholars do not address how responsive behavior varies across particular members. Focusing on Court curbing legislation in Congress, we develop a model of heterogeneous responsiveness. Our theory identifies two distinct mechanisms that underpin responsiveness in judicial behavior, implying that the chief justice and the most moderate (swing) justice are more likely than their colleagues to adjust their behavior in response to external threats from Congress. We find that these two justices are significantly less likely to vote to invalidate legislation than their colleagues during periods of heightened Court curbing and provide evidence that distinct mechanisms shape their behaviors. In addition, we offer justice-specific evidence using a pre–post promotion analysis, demonstrating that Justice Rehnquist became responsive to Court curbing only after becoming chief justice. Our model highlights the micro-level underpinnings of judicial responsiveness to inter-institutional politics and, most broadly, speaks to the need for separation-of-powers models to differentiate the preferences of individual political actors when seeking to understand inter-institutional responsiveness.

Moderating Effect of Institutional Responsiveness on the Relationship Between Green Leadership and Green Competitiveness

With a growing focus among firms globally on saving energy and increasing environmental awareness, it is critical to explore the implementation of corporate greening in subsidiaries of multinational companies. Multinational companies need to respond simultaneously to institutional requirements and pressures for corporate greening. In this study we utilized the natural-resource-based view to investigate how green leadership can enhance green competitiveness. Based on a quantitative analysis of 212 subsidiaries of multinational companies in China, we found that green leadership positively influences green competitiveness. Further, this relationship was found to be stronger in firms with higher (more active) levels of institutional responsiveness. We highlight practical implications and make suggestions for theoretical development.