endoscopic stent
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

182
(FIVE YEARS 40)

H-INDEX

27
(FIVE YEARS 2)

Endoscopy ◽  
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tomohiro Ishii ◽  
Takashi Kaneko ◽  
Yuichi Suzuki ◽  
Masaki Nishimura ◽  
Kazuya Sugimori ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 108 (Supplement_9) ◽  
Author(s):  
Owain Greaves ◽  
Ryan Baron ◽  
Jonathan Evans ◽  
Michael Raraty ◽  
Kulbir Mann ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Symptomatic pancreatic pseudocysts or walled off necrosis following pancreatitis can be drained via a stoma from the collection to the GI tract, this is typically facilitated by endoscopic stents. These stents are left in-situ until the area has drained, this can take several months. The stent is then ideally removed endoscopically. Little is known about the consequences of failed endoscopic stent removal or factors contributing to this failure.   Methods Retrospective analysis of prospective data at LUHFT between 1st January 2018 and 31st December 2019 of patients receiving at least one Hot Axios stent for management of pancreatic collection. Normally distributed data were compared using Student’s two tailed T test, with non-parametric data compared using Mann-Witney U test, categorical data were analysed using Chi2 test Results 131 patients were included in analysis, of which 74 were male with a median age of 56 years (IQR 46-66.5).  Failure of endoscopic removal (14 patients) was associated with a longer time to removal; 101 days (IQR 78-121) to first attempt vs. 49 days (IQR 19-104) to first endoscopic attempt where the stent was successfully retrieved endoscopically (p < 0.01). Surgical removal was undertaken in 6 patients, with significant morbidity in 2 of 6 patients. Overall 90-day mortality in patients undergoing Hot Axios stent placement was 8 of 131 (6%). Conclusions Endoscopic stent removal fails more frequently in patients where the stent has remained in situ for a long time before removal is attempted. Surgical removal of Hot Axios Stents is associated with significant morbidity, and this should be balanced against the as yet unknown consequences of leaving Hot Axios stent in-situ permanently.


2021 ◽  
Vol 34 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Norberto Daniel Velasco Hernandez ◽  
Héctor Rául Horiuchi ◽  
Lucas Abal ◽  
Matías Sabatini ◽  
Agustina Redondo ◽  
...  

Abstract   Esophageal leiomyoma is the most common benign tumor of the esophagus. Although enucleation via thoracotomy has been considered standard treatment, minimally invasive surgery is increasingly used for the treatment of this disease. The authors report the clinical outcomes of three procedures for enucleation. Methods From November 2011 to December 2020, 3 females (52, 58, and 67 years old) patients were treated for leiomyoma of the middle third of the esophagus. A history of dysphagia and chest pain was present. Upper gastrointestinal endoscopic, computerized tomography, and endoscopic ultrasound were performed, in only one case barium swallow was used. Results The surgical approaches included right thoracoscopy in prone position, enucleation, and small thoracotomy for removing the specimen. There were no major morbidities, including deaths. One patient presented a leak, which was resolved with an endoscopic stent. Conclusion Minimally invasive enucleation of esophageal leiomyoma can be performed effectively and safely. Right thoracoscopic in prone position for the removal of esophageal leiomyomas may be recommended as the treatment of choice in centers experienced with esophageal surgery.


2021 ◽  
Vol 22 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jan Śnieżyński ◽  
Bartosz Wilczyński ◽  
Tomasz Skoczylas ◽  
Grzegorz T. Wallner

2021 ◽  
Vol 14 (6) ◽  
pp. e243748
Author(s):  
Julian Süsstrunk ◽  
Miriam Thumshirn ◽  
Ralph Peterli ◽  
Marko Kraljević

A 25-year-old patient underwent laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass surgery with an initially uneventful postoperative course. Two weeks postoperatively, the patient presented with acute abdominal pain. CT scan revealed a gastrogastric fistula from the gastric pouch to the gastric remnant. Laparoscopic drainage was performed, and intraoperative endoscopy confirmed a large gastrogastric fistula. Due to intense adhesions between pouch and remnant, a closure by suture of the fistula was not possible. The fistula was initially treated with a fully covered metal stent. After multiple stent migrations despite clip attachment to the mucosa, the stent was changed to a partially covered metal stent. Fistula healing progress was documented every 2 weeks. After 10 weeks of stent treatment, fistula closure was accomplished.In conclusion, early fistula from the gastric pouch to the gastric remnant is a rare complication and can be managed with endoscopic stent placement.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document