annual lecture
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

243
(FIVE YEARS 11)

H-INDEX

15
(FIVE YEARS 0)

2021 ◽  
Vol 17 ◽  
pp. 419
Author(s):  
Niketas Siniossoglou
Keyword(s):  

Foreword to C. Th. Dimaras Annual Lecture, 2019


2020 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
pp. 447-468
Author(s):  
Laurence Boisson de Chazournes

Recognising that the settlement of international disputes has always been and continues to be characterised by its plurality, this lecture explores the different ways to achieve a coordinated dispute resolution process, with particular reference to investment disputes. Some of these means come into play at the time of the referral to the courts, thus preventing a situation of multiple proceedings from occurring. Others operate downstream of the referral, in order to coordinate the multiple proceedings arising from the same dispute. The lecture then concludes with an examination of the legal foundations underlying the use of these means.


Holiness ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 2 (3) ◽  
pp. 337-358
Author(s):  
Pete Phillips

AbstractThe following article was delivered as the annual lecture of the Methodist Sacramental Fellowship at the 2016 Methodist Conference in London. Beginning with the original context of John Wesley's well-known phrase, ‘the world as my parish’, this article explores the digital aspects of our global parish today. Putting the digital age on the agenda of the Church's mission is seen as a similar response to Wesley's decision to become ‘more vile’ and enter the world of field preaching. The lecture concludes by offering a fresh approach to Methodist identity magnified by aspects of digital culture, calling for the creation of digital Arminianism, digital field preaching, digital creativity and, ultimately, a digital parish. The article proposes that Methodism embrace a digital social holiness to spread scriptural holiness throughout the geographic and digital landscape.


2020 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 1-10
Author(s):  
Rachel Rammal

Diversity Now! is an annual lecture series hosted by the Centre for Fashion Diversity and Social Change at Ryerson University in Toronto, Canada. This lecture series explores how individuals have used fashion as a means to inspire social change and political advocacy in their personal lives, their community, or the fashion industry. The 2019 guest lecturer was Dr. Madison Moore, an artist-scholar, DJ, and Assistant Professor of Gender, Sexuality and Women’s Studies at Virginia Commonwealth University. In this seventh series lecture, Moore discussed the journey and research behind his recent book Fabulous: The Rise of The Beautiful Eccentric (2018). Drawing on autobiography, anecdotal evidence, and interviews, Moore took his audience on a journey from his childhood in Ferguson, Missouri, to the night scene in New York, London, and Berlin, with an emphasis on Vogue Balls and catwalks. While Moore’s lecture drew on various sources, his message was unequivocal: style and clothes have the power to inspire social change.


2019 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. 358-371
Author(s):  
George A. Bermann

It is no exaggeration to describe the relationship between the European Union and international arbitration as the most dramatic confrontation between two international legal regimes seen in a great many years. International law scholars commonly lament the ‘fragmentation’ of international law,1 i.e. the co-existence of multiple international legal regimes whose competences overlap and whose policies may differ, resulting in a degree of regulatory disorder. However, seldom do these regimes actually ‘collide’. By contrast, the two international regimes in which we are interested this evening – international arbitration and the European Union – may be described, without hyperbole, as on a collision course. Arguably, the collision has already occurred. The emergence of hostilities on this scale in recent years came about as something of a surprise to me. At Columbia and elsewhere, I have taught EU law and international arbitration law concurrently – in different courses, of course – for more decades than I care to count. Over that period, I have written and spoken about the EU and international arbitration as separate and distinct enterprises.2 Rarely did teaching, writing or speaking of one necessitate, or even prompt, discussion of the other.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document