The Analogical Model of Cognitive Principles and Its Significance for the Dialogue between Science and Theology

Analogical models in science enable us to understand unobservable theoretical entities. We need this basic understanding, even in the case of mental phenomena, where multiple cognitive principles are involved. In this article, we suggest an analogical model of cognition that incorporates basic insights from the philosophies of science and theology, which could serve as a point of contact for the dialogue between science and theology. For this purpose, we presuppose six stages of understanding and the existence of six different theoretical cognitive principles that have their own characteristics, which coincide with some Biblical characters, theological reflections and scientific approaches to finding the truth. The choice of the analogical model and the cognitive principles is justified with their ability to organize, structure and make sense of different segments of scientific and theological knowledge, which otherwise seem confused, unrelated and without structure. The analogical model gives us a big picture of their relations and confirms the ability of the observable macroworld and phenomenological experience to assist us in understanding the realities that, at first sight, seem incomprehensible.

Virtual By-passing of Query Server for Privacy of Users for Continuous Location Based Services

Location Based Services anticipate that customers should continually report their zone to a possibly untrusted server to get organizations reliant on their territory, which can open them to security risks. Tragically, existing security defending strategies for LBS have a couple of requirements, for instance, requiring a totally trusted in outcast, offering confined insurance confirmations and realizing high correspondence overhead. In this errand, A customer portrayed security organize structure called dynamic grid system (DGS) is proposed; the important sweeping structure that fulfills four central requirements for insurance shielding delineation and industrious LBS. The structure just requires a semi-trusted in outcast, at risk for doing clear planning undertakings viably. This semi-accepted pariah doesn't have any information about a customer's region. Secure delineation and steady zone assurance is guaranteed under the described enemy models. The correspondence cost for the customer doesn't depend upon the customer's optimal insurance level, it just depends upon the amount of huge central focuses in the area of the customer. Notwithstanding the way that the consideration is on range and k-nearest neighbor requests in this work, This structure can be easily connected with assistance other spatial inquiries without changing the estimations run by the semi-trusted in outcast and the database server, gave the essential interest an area of a spatial request can be engrossed into spatial regions. Experimental results show that the DGS is more productive than the best in class protection saving strategy for LBS.

Research on the Interface Bonding Conditions of Bimetallic Rolls Manufactured by Liquid-Solid Bonding Method

Bimetallic rolls’ interfaces manufactured by liquid-solid bonding method have been studied in the manuscript. Effect of pretreatment method of roll core, pouring temperature and preheating temperature of core to the bonding of interfaces are analyzed. Line scanning to the element chromium is done with SEM, the effect of technology to the organize structure and element diffusion is researched; Shear stress experiment of interface is done to analyze the effect of technology to bond strength.

Science and technology: socialising what for whom?

In the Handbook on the socialisation of scientific and technological research, edited by Wiebe Bijker and Luciano d’Andrea, ‘socialisation’ is used to both describe and prescribe the ways in which science and technology are used in society. In this comment, ‘socialisation’ is discussed from two other points of view. First, the ways in which science and technology are sometimes used to organize, structure and dominate the social are identified. Second, drawing on Merton’s norms of science, an argument is made against over-socialising science and in favour of acknowledging and preserving the ‘special’ nature of science, for its own sake and because, at its best, science can offer an alternative model for other social activities.