Reconstruction Surgeries for Management of Posterolateral Rotatory Instability of The Elbow: A Systematic Review

We aimed to investigate the indications, techniques, and results of lateral ulnar collateral ligament reconstruction (LUCLR) for posterolateral rotatory instability of the elbow (PLRI) by collecting currently available data. Several databases (PUBMED & EMBASE) were explored for articles published between 2010 and 2020. A search strategy was applied. Altogether, 2,583 studies were recovered for possible inclusion. After adjusting for duplicates, revision of methodology, exclusion of non-full text studies, and those in languages other than English, only four studies remained, which included 51 patients, with more males than females (56.9% and 43.1%, respectively). The patients’ mean age was 35.1 years. Eight patients (15.7%) were managed by the Docking technique in one retrospective study, while 43 patients (84.3%) were managed by the trans-osseous technique. Both trans-osseous and Docking techniques are safe and efficient in the management of PLRI cases. The trans-osseous technique has better functional and postoperative results and lesser complications. Mesh Words: posterolateral rotatory instability of the elbow; lateral ulnar collateral ligament reconstruction surgery; systematic review; meta-analysis

Injuries of the Posterolateral Corner of the Knee-Diagnosis and Treatment Options for Beginning and Advanced Arthroscopic Surgeons

Injuries to the posterolateral corner (PLC) of the knee may have a devastating impact on whole joint. Posterolateral rotatory instability, despite getting more and more popular among orthopedic surgeons, still remains challenging to diagnose and even more challenging to treat. Available surgical techniques are demanding and require advanced surgical skills. In this chapter we are going to review the diagnostic tools which help to recognize posterolateral rotatory instability of the knee, to outline its importance and consequences of misdiagnosis as well as present arthroscopic popliteus tenodesis and arthroscopic-assisted posterolateral corner reconstruction which are our minimally invasive techniques used to treat this condition depending on PLC injury pattern and grading. Presented techniques are reproducible, safe and do not require advanced surgical skills being a useful alternative for available open PLC reconstructions.

The knee in congenital femoral deficiency and its implication in limb lengthening: a systematic review

Congenital femoral deficiency (CFD) is a rare disorder with several limb anomalies including limb shortening and knee cruciate ligament dysplasia. Limb lengthening is usually performed to correct lower limb discrepancy. However, complications, such as knee subluxation/dislocation, can occur during this treatment. Here, we explore CFD knee abnormalities and knee dislocation during limb elongation, discussing when and whether knee ligament reconstruction prior to the lengthening would be necessary to reduce the risk of knee dislocation. There is not enough support in the literature for the routine reconstruction of cruciate ligaments in CFD patients. Of note, in cases of severe anteroposterior or posterolateral rotatory instability, cruciate ligament reconstruction might be considered to decrease the risk of knee subluxation/dislocation during the lengthening treatment. Cite this article: EFORT Open Rev 2021;6:565-571. DOI: 10.1302/2058-5241.6.200075

Supplementary Lateral Extra-articular Tenodesis for Residual Anterolateral Rotatory Instability in Patients Undergoing Single-Bundle Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

Background: The combination of lateral extra-articular tenodesis (LET) with primary single-bundle anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction (ACLR) remains controversial. Purpose: To determine whether the combination of LET with single-bundle ACLR provides greater control of anterolateral rotatory instability and improved clinical outcomes compared with ACLR alone. Study Design: Systematic review; Level of evidence, 2. Methods: PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials databases were searched between inception and July 1, 2020. Level 1 or 2 randomized controlled trials that compared isolated single-bundle ACLR with combined LET with ACLR were included. Data were meta-analyzed for the primary outcome measure of knee stability and the secondary outcome measures of patient-reported outcome scores, return to sports, and graft failure. Dichotomous variables were presented as relative risks (RRs), and continuous variables were presented as mean differences (MDs) and standardized MDs (SMDs). Results: A total of 6 studies involving 1010 patients were included. Pooled data showed that the ACLR+LET group had a lower incidence of the pivot shift (RR, 0.56 [95% CI, 0.45 to 0.69]; P < .00001), a higher postoperative activity level (MD, 0.47 [95% CI, 0.15 to 0.78]; P = .004), and a lower risk of graft failure (RR, 0.35 [95% CI, 0.21 to 0.59]; P < .00001) than did the ACLR group. However, there were no statistically significant differences in primary outcomes including positive Lachman test findings (RR, 0.76 [95% CI, 0.48 to 1.21]; P = .26) or side-to-side differences (SMD, –0.43 [95% CI, –0.95 to 0.09]; P = .11) or in secondary outcomes including International Knee Documentation Committee scores (SMD, 0.25 [95% CI, –0.06 to 0.56]; P = .11) or Lysholm scores (SMD, 0.28 [95% CI, –0.06 to 0.62]; P = .11). Although the overall rate of return to sports was not significantly different between the groups (RR, 0.97 [95% CI, 0.90 to 1.03]; P = .33), the activity level was higher in the ACLR+LET group. Conclusion: The addition of LET to primary single-bundle ACLR produced greater knee stability, a higher activity level, and a lower incidence of graft failure than did ACLR alone. There may be a role for adding LET to ACLR for the treatment of ACL injuries.