seed fates
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

17
(FIVE YEARS 1)

H-INDEX

9
(FIVE YEARS 0)

2021 ◽  
Vol 110 ◽  
pp. 103698
Author(s):  
Abhishek Gopal ◽  
Divya Mudappa ◽  
TR Shankar Raman ◽  
Rohit Naniwadekar


2020 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Haibin Kang ◽  
Mingjie Chang ◽  
Shutong Liu ◽  
Zhi Chao ◽  
Xinping Zhang ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Seed dispersal by scatter-hoarding animals can affect the developmental dynamics of plant communities. However, how animals might participate in plant inter-community competition has rarely been investigated. Forest community junction is an area where the competition between plant communities is most prominent and animal activity is more frequent. At present, little is known about how scatter-hoarding animals might assist competitions by adjacent plant communities. Thus, for 3 years (2015–2017), we tracked the fate of 2880 tagged seeds (Quercus aliena var. acuteserrata, Pinus tabuliformis, and P. armandii seed) placed near an edge where the forest composition changes from a pine forest to an oak forest in northwestern China. Results We found that the seed fates differed when Quercus and Pinus seeds entered adjacent stands. In contrast to Pinus seeds, acorns that entered pine forests were characterized by higher caching rates and longer dispersal distances. Pinus seeds had the highest probability of being predated (85%) by rodents, and eleven Q. aliena var. acuteserrata seedlings were established in pine forests, although none survived in the later stages. In addition, rodents exhibited obvious selectivity in terms of the microhabitats for the seed caching sites. Conclusions Seed fates differed when Quercus and Pinus seeds entered adjacent stands. The predation pressure by rodents on the seeds of Pinus species limited the germination of seeds and seedling establishment in oak forests. The different seed fates after their bidirectional dispersal could affect the differences in natural regeneration between pine and oak forests, and they might increase the recruitment rates for oak at the edge of an adjacent community. Rodent-mediated seed dispersal could potential unintentionally affect the competition between plant communities.





2014 ◽  
Vol 8 (2) ◽  
pp. 121-132 ◽  
Author(s):  
Brian A. Pace ◽  
Helen M. Alexander ◽  
Jason D. Emry ◽  
Kristin L. Mercer


Oecologia ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 174 (4) ◽  
pp. 1401-1413 ◽  
Author(s):  
Susan E. Meyer ◽  
Katherine T. Merrill ◽  
Phil S. Allen ◽  
Julie Beckstead ◽  
Anna S. Norte


Plant Ecology ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 212 (5) ◽  
pp. 785-793 ◽  
Author(s):  
X. F. Yi ◽  
Y. Q. Yang ◽  
Z. B. Zhang


2009 ◽  
Vol 25 (5) ◽  
pp. 507-514 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nandini Velho ◽  
Aparajita Datta ◽  
Kavita Isvaran

Abstract:Hornbills are important dispersers of a wide range of tree species. Many of these species bear fruits with large, lipid-rich seeds that could attract terrestrial rodents. Rodents have multiple effects on seed fates, many of which remain poorly understood in the Palaeotropics. The role of terrestrial rodents was investigated by tracking seed fate of five hornbill-dispersed tree species in a tropical forest in north-east India. Seeds were marked inside and outside of exclosures below 6–12 parent fruiting trees (undispersed seed rain) and six hornbill nest trees (a post-dispersal site). Rodent visitors and seed removal were monitored using camera traps. Our findings suggest that several rodent species, especially two species of porcupine were major on-site seed predators. Scatter-hoarding was rare (1.4%). Seeds at hornbill nest trees had lower survival compared with parent fruiting trees, indicating that clumped dispersal by hornbills may not necessarily improve seed survival. Seed survival in the presence and absence of rodents varied with tree species. Some species (e.g. Polyalthia simiarum) showed no difference, others (e.g. Dysoxylum binectariferum) experienced up to a 64% decrease in survival in the presence of rodents. The differing magnitude of seed predation by rodents can have significant consequences at the seed establishment stage.



2008 ◽  
Vol 86 (5) ◽  
pp. 378-385 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. E. Moore ◽  
R. K. Swihart

S.B. Vander Wall et al. (Ecology, 86: 801–806 (2005)) criticized seed dispersal studies that use seed removal as a proxy for seed predation, because secondary dispersal processes following removal are important to seed fates for many plants. We compared seed removal rates with direct estimates of seed mortality and another mortality index, based on a 3-year experiment that included five temperate deciduous tree species and four exclosure treatments designed to identify effects of different seed consumer groups. Patterns of seed removal rates generally did not match patterns of mortality. Removal and mortality rates were both highest in seed-poor years, indicative of response to food limitation, but annual food abundance interacted with seed type differently for removal rates than for mortality rates. The effect of exclosure type (access by different consumers) on removal rates was opposite its effect on mortality rates; seeds were removed fastest from exclosures that allowed access to tree squirrels (genus Sciurus L., 1758), but these seeds had the lowest mortality because Sciurus is an important seed disperser. We discuss types of studies in which seed removal may be a reasonable index of seed mortality, and we stress the importance of justifying assumptions concerning links between removal and predation.



Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document