discrepancy score
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

19
(FIVE YEARS 4)

H-INDEX

6
(FIVE YEARS 0)

2021 ◽  
pp. 073428292110405
Author(s):  
Joseph J. Ryan ◽  
Samuel T. Gontkovsky

We analyzed data from the WASI–II manual to determine discrepancy score reliabilities of the Verbal Comprehension (VCI) and Perceptual Reasoning (PRI) indexes and the four subtests in the child and adult standardization samples. Reliabilities of the VCI–PRI discrepancy scores range from .78 to .86 for children and .82 to .89 for adults and generally are large enough to justify hypothesis generation. Discrepancy score reliabilities of the subtests range from .64 to .82 and .66 to .84 for children and adults, respectively, and therefore must be considered on a score-by-score basis in formulating hypotheses. Tables are provided to identify significant differences between pairs of subtests and to determine ipsative strengths and weaknesses when each subtest is compared to the mean of four subtests. The use of confidence intervals for the interpretation of discrepancy scores is presented. If additional discrepancy score reliabilities and cut-offs are desired, the necessary formulas are provided.


2021 ◽  
pp. 073428292110065
Author(s):  
Joseph J. Ryan ◽  
Laura Glass Umfleet ◽  
Samuel T. Gontkovsky

This investigation provides internal consistency reliabilities for the Wechsler Memory Scale–Fourth Edition (WMS–IV) subtest and index discrepancy scores using the standardization samples of the Adult and Older Adult batteries. Subtest reliabilities ranged from .00 to .93 for Adults and .25 to .94 for Older Adults. Three of 91 Adult coefficients and three of 24 Older Adult coefficients reached the recommended level (≥ .90). Index reliabilities ranged from .46 to .94 for 100 Adult Battery comparisons and .19 to 93 for 36 Older Adult Battery comparisons. Each battery had 10 coefficients ≥ .90. Ability–memory discrepancies were reported using WAIS–IV VCI, PRI, WMI, and GAI as intelligence standards. Ability–memory comparisons for the Adult Battery ranged from .82 to .93 with 12 of 20 comparisons ≥ .90; Older Adult Battery reliabilities ranged from .85 to .94 with six of 16 comparisons ≥ .90. In terms of discrepancy score reliabilities, the WMS–IV represents a marked improvement over the WMS–III.


2020 ◽  
Vol 18 (3) ◽  
pp. 281-292
Author(s):  
Alireza Amiri ◽  
◽  
Minoo Kalantari ◽  
Mehdi Rezaee ◽  
Alireza Akbarzadeh Baghban ◽  
...  

Objectives: To investigate whether Iranian children and adolescents with Cerebral Palsy (CP) participate in their preferred leisure activities. Methods: A group of children and adolescents (n=152; 59.2% male; aged 7-17 years; Mean±SD of age was 10.93±3.46 years old) diagnosed with CP (39.5% hemiplegic; 28.9% quadriplegic; 31.6% diplegic) were selected to complete the children’s assessment of participation and the enjoyment (CAPE) and Preference for Activities of Children (PAC) questionnaires. Results: Recreational and social activities were the most preferred (PAC mean score=2.13±0.40; 2.08±0.40, respectively), and active-physical activities were the least preferred (PAC mean score=1.60±0.46). Preferences were strongly correlated with leisure participation (P<0.001), although there were still discrepancies between them. A discrepancy score was introduced, and skill-based activities demonstrated the highest discrepancy score (discrepancy mean score=3.39±2.97). Discussion: Greater preferences for leisure activities are linked with a higher frequency of participation but, that does not necessarily mean that children and adolescents with CP always participate in their most preferred leisure activities. They sometimes cannot participate in their preferred leisure activities and sometimes participate in activities that they do not like. Occupational therapists are encouraged to consider these findings to design more effective plans to achieve improved participation outcomes.


Author(s):  
S. Hamisu ◽  
S. Umar ◽  
Isma’il O. Oladosu ◽  
Ayuba, Gona

The study examines the discrepancy of job competency on SAFE programme beneficiaries in North-Western Nigeria. A multi-stage sampling technique was adopted in selecting 285 sample sizes. Two categories of respondents were considered namely: SAFE beneficiaries (212) and employer’s (73). Primary data was collected using structured questionnaires and all the questionnaires were returned and found useful for the study. Data collected were analyzed using descriptive statistics such as percentage counts, means; standard deviation and discrepancy scores. The study revealed that majority (96%) of the SAFE beneficiaries were male, married (86%) with a mean age of about 44 years, and about 18 years of working experiences in extension services. SAFE beneficiaries had a mean of 6 persons per household with a current mean salary grade level of 12. The study revealed that job competencies identified in SAFE programme were rated ‘high important’ to extension service delivery. The study further reveals that SAFE beneficiaries were rated high in job competencies possessed as result of SAFE programme. More so, the study established a positive (0.00) discrepancy score on professionalism among the SAFE beneficiaries in the study area. The study concludes that SAFE programme had positively influenced job competencies of the agricultural extension workers. The study further recommends that there is need for more female incorporated in agricultural extension services, inclusiveness of other extension workers to key into the SAFE programme as well as the need to strengthened professionalism in the SAFE programme curricula across the participating Universities in Nigeria.


2014 ◽  
Vol 14 (4) ◽  
pp. 374-379 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anna L. Paskausky ◽  
M. Colleen Simonelli

2009 ◽  
Vol 28 (3) ◽  
pp. 201-208 ◽  
Author(s):  
Laura A. Glass ◽  
Joseph J. Ryan ◽  
Richard A. Charter

2009 ◽  
Author(s):  
Laura A. Glass ◽  
Joseph J. Ryan ◽  
Richard A. Charter

2008 ◽  
Vol 27 (2) ◽  
pp. 138-144 ◽  
Author(s):  
Laura A. Glass ◽  
Joseph J. Ryan ◽  
Richard A. Charter ◽  
Jared M. Bartels

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document