malt quality
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

154
(FIVE YEARS 24)

H-INDEX

20
(FIVE YEARS 2)

Author(s):  
Diego Girón-Orozco ◽  
María Dolores Mariezcurrena-Berasain ◽  
Dora Luz Pinzón-Martínez ◽  
Erick Heredia-Olea ◽  
José Francisco Ramírez-Dávila

Author(s):  
Pablo Prystupa ◽  
Andrés Peton ◽  
Eduardo Pagano ◽  
Gustavo Ferraris ◽  
Luis Ventimiglia ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Weronika Filipowska ◽  
Barbara Jaskula‐Goiris ◽  
Maciej Ditrych ◽  
Paula Bustillo Trueba ◽  
Gert De Rouck ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  

Author(s):  
Matthias Baldus ◽  
Florian Heukäufer ◽  
Carla Großpietsch ◽  
Frank-Jürgen Methner

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mekonnen Gebeyaw

The greatest use of barley for malting purpose mostly for brewing industry. The quality of malt depends upon various grain parameters as kernel shape, size, boldness, grain protein content etc., which affects the malt quality that is malt yield, friability, homogeneity.The availability of barley for malting is not a problem, but whatever barley is available it is very poor interims of quality and not meeting the minimum standards of malting quality. So, that identification of malt barely varieties with different grain and malt parameters, which are desired for better malt production and quality improvement, needed for various products is very essential. Potential areas that boost the production, pertinent agronomic practice studies and strengthening micro malting laboratory and expert capacity are recommended to overcome the limitations of malt barley production and malt quality improvement.


2021 ◽  
pp. 143-149
Author(s):  
Anna A. Semenyuta ◽  
Tatyana V. Tanashkina
Keyword(s):  

2020 ◽  
Vol 100 (6) ◽  
pp. 653-665
Author(s):  
B.D. Tidemann ◽  
J.T. O’Donovan ◽  
M. Izydorczyk ◽  
T.K. Turkington ◽  
L. Oatway ◽  
...  

Malting barley is important in western Canada, yet many malting cultivars do not meet malt quality standards, in part due to lodging. Lodging can decrease barley yield and quality thereby reducing the acceptability for malting. In other countries, plant growth regulator (PGR) applications are used to mitigate lodging. Chlormequat chloride (chlormequat), trinexapac-ethyl (trinexapac), and ethephon were tested at five locations over 3 yr in western Canada for their ability to limit lodging, as well as their effects on yield, agronomic traits, and pre-malt quality characteristics. PGR applications occurred between Zadoks growth stage (GS) 30–33 for chlormequat and trinexapac and GS 37–49 for ethephon. Seeding rates of 200, 300, and 400 seeds m−2 of CDC Copeland barley were used to increase the likelihood of lodging. Increased seeding rate decreased tillers per plant, height, days to maturity, kernel protein, and kernel weight. Ethephon increased the number of tillers per plant and decreased plant height, kernel plumpness, and kernel weight. Trinexapac decreased plant height and kernel weight. Days to maturity was investigated across site-years, with ethephon increasing maturity in 60% of comparisons. Trinexapac and chlormequat had limited effects on maturity. Lodging was investigated across site-years, with trinexapac showing the largest number of lodging reductions and scale of reductions. Ethephon reduced lodging in 36% of comparisons, while chlormequat had inconsistent effects. None of the products affected yield or grain protein. The results suggest PGRs may not be the solution to lodging for CDC Copeland barley on the Canadian Prairies; however, trinexapac shows the most promise of the products tested.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document