Proneural genes define ground state rules to regulate neurogenic patterning and cortical folding

SUMMARYTransition from smooth, lissencephalic brains to highly-folded, gyrencephalic structures is associated with neuronal expansion and breaks in neurogenic symmetry. Here we show that Neurog2 and Ascl1 proneural genes regulate cortical progenitor cell differentiation through cross-repressive interactions to sustain neurogenic continuity in a lissencephalic rodent brain. Using in vivo lineage tracing, we found that Neurog2 and Ascl1 expression defines a lineage continuum of four progenitor pools, with ‘double+ progenitors’ displaying several unique features (least lineage-restricted, complex gene regulatory network, G2 pausing). Strikingly, selective killing of double+ progenitors using split-Cre;Rosa-DTA transgenics breaks neurogenic symmetry by locally disrupting Notch signaling, leading to cortical folding. Finally, consistent with NEUROG2 and ASCL1 driving discontinuous neurogenesis and folding in gyrencephalic species, their transcripts are modular in folded macaque cortices and pseudo-folded human cerebral organoids. Neurog2/Ascl1 double+ progenitors are thus Notch-ligand expressing ‘niche’ cells that control neurogenic periodicity to determine cortical gyrification.HIGHLIGHTSNeurog2 and Ascl1 expression defines four distinct transitional progenitor statesDouble+ NPCs are transcriptionally complex and mark a lineage branch pointDouble+ NPCs control neurogenic patterning and cortical folding via Notch signalingNeurog2 and Ascl1 expression is modular in folded and not lissencephalic corticeseTOC BLURBEmergence of a gyrencephalic cortex is associated with a break in neurogenic continuity across the cortical germinal zone. Han et al. identify a pool of unbiased neural progenitors at a lineage bifurcation point that co-express Neurog2 and Ascl1 and produce Notch ligands to control neurogenic periodicity and cortical folding.

Drosophila Neuroblast Selection Gated by Notch, Snail, SoxB and EMT Gene Interplay

SUMMARYIn the developing Drosophila central nervous system neural progenitor (neuroblast; NB) selection is gated by lateral inhibition, controlled by Notch signalling and proneural genes. However, proneural mutants only display partial NB reduction, indicating the existence of additional genes with proneural activity. In addition, recent studies reveal involvement of key epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT) genes in NB selection, but the regulatory interplay between Notch signalling and the EMT machinery is unclear. We find that the SoxB gene SoxNeuro and the Snail gene worniou are integrated with the Notch pathway, and constitute the missing proneural genes. Notch signalling, the proneural, SoxNeuro, and worniou genes regulate key EMT genes to orchestrate the NB specification process. Hence, we uncover an expanded lateral inhibition network for NB specification, and demonstrate its link to key players in the EMT machinery. Because of the evolutionary conservation of the genes involved, the Notch-SoxB-Snail-EMT network may control neural progenitor selection in many other systems.

Neurog2 and Ascl1 together regulate a postmitotic derepression circuit to govern laminar fate specification in the murine neocortex

A derepression mode of cell-fate specification involving the transcriptional repressors Tbr1, Fezf2, Satb2, and Ctip2 operates in neocortical projection neurons to specify six layer identities in sequence. Less well understood is how laminar fate transitions are regulated in cortical progenitors. The proneural genes Neurog2 and Ascl1 cooperate in progenitors to control the temporal switch from neurogenesis to gliogenesis. Here we asked whether these proneural genes also regulate laminar fate transitions. Several defects were observed in the derepression circuit in Neurog2−/−;Ascl1−/− mutants: an inability to repress expression of Tbr1 (a deep layer VI marker) during upper-layer neurogenesis, a loss of Fezf2+/Ctip2+ layer V neurons, and precocious differentiation of normally late-born, Satb2+ layer II–IV neurons. Conversely, in stable gain-of-function transgenics, Neurog2 promoted differentiative divisions and extended the period of Tbr1+/Ctip2+ deep-layer neurogenesis while reducing Satb2+ upper-layer neurogenesis. Similarly, acute misexpression of Neurog2 in early cortical progenitors promoted Tbr1 expression, whereas both Neurog2 and Ascl1 induced Ctip2. However, Neurog2 was unable to influence the derepression circuit when misexpressed in late cortical progenitors, and Ascl1 repressed only Satb2. Nevertheless, neurons derived from late misexpression of Neurog2 and, to a lesser extent, Ascl1, extended aberrant subcortical axon projections characteristic of early-born neurons. Finally, Neurog2 and Ascl1 altered the expression of Ikaros and Foxg1, known temporal regulators. Proneural genes thus act in a context-dependent fashion as early determinants, promoting deep-layer neurogenesis in early cortical progenitors via input into the derepression circuit while also influencing other temporal regulators.

Evolutionary changes in transcription factor coding sequence quantitatively alter sensory organ development and function

Animals are characterized by a set of highly conserved developmental regulators. Changes in the cis-regulatory elements of these regulators are thought to constitute the major driver of morphological evolution. However, the role of coding sequence evolution remains unresolved. To address this question, we used the Atonal family of proneural transcription factors as a model. Drosophila atonal coding sequence was endogenously replaced with that of atonal homologues (ATHs) at key phylogenetic positions, non-ATH proneural genes, and the closest homologue to ancestral proneural genes. ATHs and the ancestral-like coding sequences rescued sensory organ fate in atonal mutants, in contrast to non-ATHs. Surprisingly, different ATH factors displayed different levels of proneural activity as reflected by the number and functionality of sense organs. This proneural potency gradient correlated directly with ATH protein stability, including in response to Notch signaling, independently of mRNA levels or codon usage. This establishes a distinct and ancient function for ATHs and demonstrates that coding sequence evolution can underlie quantitative variation in sensory development and function.