The Basics of Hydrogen Uptake in Iron and Steel

Armco iron and L80 steel (according to API 5CT) were charged under various conditions due to often not knowing the exact amount of hydrogen absorbed during operation and laboratory charging. These two materials were charged in sodium chloride (NaCl), sulfuric acid (H2SO4), both with and without addition of thiourea (CH4N2S), and in H2S (NACE TM0177) at open circuit potential.Additionally, cathodic charging was done in sodium chloride and sulfuric acid, both with thiourea added at a current density of 1 mA/cm2. The charging time was between 2 and 336 h for both methods. Prior to the charging, the specimens were cleaned in acetone and the bulk hydrogen content of the two materials was determined. After charging, the specimens were ground with a silicone carbide paper and the hydrogen content was measured with a thermal conductivity cell after hot extraction at 950 °C.Most of the immersion tests at open circuit potential resulted in hydrogen concentrations of up to 1 wt. ppm, while the cathodic charging led to values of up to 4 wt. ppm. In addition, the NACE TM0177 test provided the highest hydrogen concentrations and was the only test to show higher hydrogen concentrations for Armco iron than for L80 steel.

The Effect of LSP on the Structure Evolution and Self-Heating of ARMCO Iron under Cyclic Loading

This work is devoted to the experimental investigation of the effect of laser shock peening (LSP) on the thermo-mechanical properties of metals. ARMCO iron was chosen as the model material for the study. Samples were subjected to LSP, and were tested following the procedure of the self-heating (Risitano) technique. To investigate the damage that was induced by heating, the fatigue tests were coupled with infrared thermography measurements. The results of the study showed that the LSP procedure qualitatively changes the temperature evolution in ARMCO iron during cyclic loading. The heating (energy dissipation) of the LSP treated specimen was several times higher than that of the specimen in the initial state. To explain the structural mechanisms of energy dissipation, the microstructure of the specimens was examined using transmission (TEM) and scanning (SEM) electron microscopy, as well as electron backscattering diffraction (EBSD). The results of the structural investigation confirm the qualitative change of defect evolution caused by LSP treatment.