men 1
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

350
(FIVE YEARS 68)

H-INDEX

32
(FIVE YEARS 2)

Cells ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (12) ◽  
pp. 3298
Author(s):  
Philipp Selke ◽  
Kaya Bork ◽  
Tao Zhang ◽  
Manfred Wuhrer ◽  
Christian Strauss ◽  
...  

Meningiomas are the most common non-malignant intracranial tumors and prefer, like most tumors, anaerobic glycolysis for energy production (Warburg effect). This anaerobic glycolysis leads to an increased synthesis of the metabolite methylglyoxal (MGO) or glyoxal (GO), which is known to react with amino groups of proteins. This reaction is called glycation, thereby building advanced glycation end products (AGEs). In this study, we investigated the influence of glycation on sialylation in two meningioma cell lines, representing the WHO grade I (BEN-MEN-1) and the WHO grade III (IOMM-Lee). In the benign meningioma cell line, glycation led to differences in expression of sialyltransferases (ST3GAL1/2/3/5/6, ST6GAL1/2, ST6GALNAC2/6, and ST8SIA1/2), which are known to play a role in tumor progression. We could show that glycation of BEN-MEN-1 cells led to decreased expression of ST3Gal5. This resulted in decreased synthesis of the ganglioside GM3, the product of ST3Gal5. In the malignant meningioma cell line, we observed changes in expression of sialyltransferases (ST3GAL1/2/3, ST6GALNAC5, and ST8SIA1) after glycation, which correlates with less aggressive behavior.


Author(s):  
S. E. Gryaznov ◽  
I. M. Buriev ◽  
G. G. Melkonyan ◽  
N. S. Malyuga ◽  
B. K. Laypanov

The article presents a clinical observation of a patient with type 1 Multiple Endocrine Neoplasia syndrome (MEN 1). During the diagnostic search, a combination of primary hyperparathyroidism, parathyroid adenoma and hormonally inactive pancreatic head tumor was found. Simultaneous transoral parathyroidectomy and laparoscopic resection of the pancreatic head was performed. We haven`t found the literature data describing such kind of operations for MEN 1 syndrome. An original solution was applied to perform intraoperative ultrasonography monitoring. The results of 1-year postoperative follow-up are presented. This observation demonstrates the possibilities of endoscopic technologies in the treatment of MEN 1 syndrome.


Author(s):  
Laila Ahmed Albishi ◽  
Nazim Faisal Hamed ◽  
Naif Mutkhan Alsharari ◽  
Wurud Muteb D. Alshammari

MEN syndromes are a collection of autosomal dominant disease including MEN 1 and MEN 2. Multiple endocrine neoplasia (MEN) syndromes are infrequent inherited disorders in which more than one endocrine glands develop noncancerous (benign) or cancerous (malignant) tumors or grow excessively without forming tumors. There are 3 famous and well-known forms of MEN syndromes (MEN 1, MEN 2A, and MEN 2B) and a newly documented one (MEN4). These syndromes are infrequent and occurred in all ages and both men and women. MEN1 is the most often happening form of MENs. The information of MEN’s genetic alterations and the connection among genotype and phenotype could be beneficial for MEN disease management. (MEN1) implicated IN primarily by tumors of the parathyroid glands, endocrine gastroenteropancreatic (GEP) tract and anterior pituitary. Before MEN-1 can be diagnosed it must be suspected, genetic screening for MEN-1 is recommended when an individual has 2 or more MEN-1 related tumors, MEN2 associates with medullary thyroid carcinoma, pheochromocytoma, and primaryhype- rparathyroidism. MEN2A and MEN2B should be suspected in any patient diagnosed with MTC or pheochromocytoma, particularly when the age of presentation is very young (younger than 35), the genetic testing for RET proto-oncogene is employed to diagnose and identify a specific type of mutation present. Treatment is mainly surgical in most cases of multiple endocrine neoplasia syndrome.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
HIROAKI SHIDEI ◽  
Shota Mitsuboshi ◽  
Tomoko Yamamoto ◽  
Masato Kanzaki

Abstract Background: Multiple endocrine neoplasia (MEN) is divided into MEN type 1 (MEN-1) and MEN type 2 (MEN-2). MEN-1 may be associated with thymic carcinoid tumors. We present a case of the surgical removal of a thymic carcinoid associated with MEN-1 via a single-incision port RATS.Case presentation: A 39-year-old male patient with multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1 (MEN-1) who had an anterior mediastinal mass was referred to our hospital. The patient had undergone total parathyroidectomy and auto-transplantation of a partial parathyroid for hyperparathyroidism 6 years ago. Chest computed tomography revealed an isolated anterior mediastinal mass on the thymic gland with a maximum diameter measuring 22 mm. Thymic carcinoid tumor is classified as MEN-1 and has a poor prognosis, so we decided to remove the tumor. Single-incision port RATS was performed, and thymic carcinoid was confirmed in pathology.Conclusions: This report demonstrates that thymic carcinoid tumor removal is feasible and easy to perform via single-incision port RATS.


2021 ◽  
Vol 67 (6) ◽  
pp. 50-58
Author(s):  
D. A. Trukhina ◽  
E. O. Mamedova ◽  
A. M. Lapshina ◽  
E. V. Vasilyev ◽  
A. N. Tiulpakov ◽  
...  

BACKGROUND: Multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1 (MEN 1) is a rare autosomal dominant disorder caused by mutations in the MEN1 gene, which encodes the menin protein. If a patient has the MEN 1 phenotype in the absence of mutations in the MEN1 gene, the condition is classified as a phenocopy of this syndrome. Although significant progress has been made in understanding the function of menin, its role in the oncogenesis of the endocrine glands is still being elucidated. Due to its key role in physiological and pathological processes, the assessment of the menin expression can provide valuable information.AIM: to determine whether there are any differences in the expression of menin in the pituitary adenomas (PA) in patients with phenocopy of MEN 1 (phMEN 1) and genetically confirmed MEN 1 (gMEN 1) compared with their sporadic forms.MATERIALS AND METHODS: immunohistochemical assessment of the menin expression was carried out in PA of patients with gMEN 1, phMEN 1 and sporadic acromegaly (SA), surgically treated in 2008–2020. IHC was performed using antibodies to menin, PRL, GH, ACTH, FSH, TSH, Pit-1, T-box, ERA on previously prepared histological section.RESULTS: The study included 35 samples of PA: gMEN 1 — 9 samples, phMEN 1 — 12 (somatotropinomas + PHPT); CA — 14  samples. The patients were comparable by gender, adenoma size, and drug intake. The gMEN  1 group differed from phMEN 1 and SA by age (p = 0.0005). In patients with gMEN 1, the expression of menin varied from no staining (5/9) to intense cytoplasm staining. Cytoplasmic expression of menin was mainly present (11/12) in the phMEN 1. In the SA group, there was no staining in 1 case; nuclear expression was detected in 6/14 cases. The phMEN  1 group showed significantly higher cytoplasmic expression of menin than the gMEN  1 group (p = 0.006). The gMEN 1 group also differed from the SA group (p = 0.012). There were no statistically significant differences between the phMEN 1 and SA groups (p = 0.049).CONCLUSION: It was revealed that the menin expression, in general, is retained in phMEN 1 and SA groups, although with different localization in the cell structure (nucleus and / or cytoplasm). At the same time, the expression of menin varies greatly in patients with gMEN 1. According to the data obtained, it can be assumed that the pathogenesis of PA in phMEN 1 and SA may have similarities; however, there could be factors contributing to the appearance of several tumors of the endocrine glands in one person with phMEN 1. To understand this process, it is necessary to further study the genes associated with MEN 1, epigenetic factors, signaling pathways in which menin is involved.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Susan Mathew ◽  
Wasat Mansoor ◽  
Safwaan Adam

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Heimo Mairbäurl ◽  
Lars Kaestner ◽  
Anna Yu. Bogdanova ◽  
Marie Klein ◽  
Giampaolo Minetti
Keyword(s):  
Men 1 ◽  

2021 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 3274-3283
Author(s):  
Aida Astrid Obando Rodríguez
Keyword(s):  

El proyecto fue desarrollado en la Escuela Normal Superior de Ibagué, con estudiantes del grado 13º del Programa de Formación Complementaria, quienes se educan para desarrollar procesos pedagógicos en el nivel de Preescolar y de Básica Primaria, según decreto 4790, MEN[1] (2008), así como de educación inicial según adición en el decreto 1236, MEN (2020). El objetivo fue interpretar, desde de diarios de campo, las emociones emergentes de la práctica pedagógica, de las cuales poco se reflexiona e investiga en los planes de formación inicial de maestros, instituidos principalmente, en teorías sobre enseñanza y aprendizaje. Lo anterior, es fundamento de mi interés investigativo sobre políticas y prácticas educativas que promueven cultura investigativa para la formación de maestros normalistas superiores, en el Doctorado en Ciencias de la Educación, que actualmente curso con Rudecolombia. El propósito de la investigación exigió la sistematización, el análisis y la interpretación de 60 diarios de campo de los maestros en formación, en los cuales no solo se narraron las experiencias pedagógicas; sino que se describieron las emociones emergentes en las intervenciones con los niños. Para Porlán (2000) el diario de campo “… es una guía para la reflexión sobre la práctica, favoreciendo la toma de conciencia del profesor sobre su proceso de evolución y sobre sus modelos de referencia” (p,23), acción metacognitiva que se convierte en un ejercicio de investigación educativa permanente. Los resultados develaron que, las acciones desarrolladas en la práctica pedagógica generan emociones multivalentes que conducen a procesos de autorreflexión, crítica e investigación sobre la misma.  Como sujetos sensibles, los maestros no son ajenos a las emociones, que en muchos momentos resultan contradictorias y que convergen en tensiones que desestiman el capital cognitivo y actitudinal del futuro profesional educativo (Bedacarratx,2012) y que limitan el mejoramiento continuo sobre cómo enseñar, cómo comprender las necesidades e intereses de los educandos y del mundo mismo, entre otras cuestiones que se instauran como objetos de investigación educativa, tarea sustancial de los maestros.   [1] MEN. Ministerio de Educación Nacional de Colombia. Máximo órgano rector de los procesos y políticas educativas en el País.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Adrian Li ◽  
Sheela Sathyanarayan ◽  
Sobia Arshad ◽  
Simon Aylwin ◽  
Georgios Dimitriadis

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document