Outcome Comparison of Latissimus Dorsi Transfer and Pectoralis Major Transfer for Irreparable Subscapularis Tendon Tear: A Systematic Review

Background: Latissimus dorsi transfer (LDT) and pectoralis major transfer (PMT) were developed to treat an irreparable subscapularis tendon tear (ISScT); however, the difference in their outcomes remains unclear. Purpose: To systematically review and compare the outcomes of LDT and PMT for ISScT. Study Design: Systematic review; Level of evidence, 4. Methods: A systematic review was performed through a comprehensive search of Embase, PubMed, and the Cochrane Library. Studies of LDT or PMT were included according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria. The primary outcome was the Constant-Murley score (CMS) at the final follow-up. Secondary outcomes included the subjective shoulder value (SSV), visual analog scale (VAS) score for pain, active shoulder range of motion, and the belly-press and lift-off tests. Postoperative failure and complication rates were the safety outcome measures. Outcomes were summarized into the LDT and PMT groups, and results were compared statistically ( P < .05). Results: Twelve studies were included in this review: 184 shoulders from 9 studies for the PMT group and 85 shoulders from 3 studies for the LDT group. For the PMT and LDT groups, the mean ages were 58.9 and 55.1 years, respectively, and the mean follow-up was 66.9 and 17.4 months, respectively. Overall, the LDT and PMT groups improved in the primary outcome (CMS) and secondary outcomes (SSV, VAS, ROM, and belly-press and lift-off tests), with low rates of failure and complication. When compared with the PMT group, the LDT group showed more significant improvements in CMS (35.2 vs 24.7; P < .001), active forward flexion (44.3° vs 14.7°; P < .001), abduction (35.0° vs 17.6°; P < .002), and positive belly-press test rate (45% vs 27%; P < .001). No statistically significant difference was seen between the groups in postoperative failure rate, complication rate, mean improvement of active internal rotation, VAS, or SSV. Conclusion: In general, LDT showed significantly better clinical outcomes postoperatively than did PMT. The available fair-quality evidence suggested that LDT might be a better choice for ISScT. Further evaluations on the relative benefits of the 2 surgical approaches are required, with more high-quality randomized controlled studies.

Predicting the clinically significant subscapularis tendon tear: malposition and tear of the long head of the biceps tendon on shoulder magnetic resonance imaging

Background The diagnostic accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is low for detecting a subscapularis tendon tear. Purpose To identify MRI findings that may predict the presence of a clinically significant subscapularis tendon tear requiring surgical repair. Material and Methods We reviewed shoulder MR images of patients who had undergone arthroscopic rotator cuff repair at our institution between June 2018 and May 2019. Patients were divided into two groups: the study group (n = 51), with an intermediate- to high-grade partial thickness tear of the subscapularis tendon suspected on preoperative MRI and intermediate or higher grade of the tendon tear proven on arthroscopy; and the control group (n = 18), with an intermediate- to high-grade partial thickness tear of the subscapularis tendon suspected on preoperative MRI but no tear or low-grade partial thickness tear of the tendon shown on arthroscopy. Preoperative MR images were retrospectively evaluated by two readers for the size of the subscapularis tendon tear, bone reactions at the lesser tuberosity, and long head of the biceps tendon (LHBT) pathology. Results The subscapularis tendon tear measured by reader 2 was larger in the study group than in the control group. The prevalence of a tear ( P = 0.006 for reader 1; P = 0.011 for reader 2) and malposition ( P < 0.001 for both readers) of the LHBT were significantly greater in the study group. Conclusion A tear and malposition of the LHBT on MR images may predict the presence of a clinically significant subscapularis tendon tear.

Arthroscopic Superior Capsule Reconstruction for Irreparable Rotator Cuff Tears: Comparison of Clinical Outcomes With and Without Subscapularis Tear

Background: Arthroscopic superior capsule reconstruction (SCR) was developed to restore shoulder superior stability, muscle balance, and function in patients with irreparable posterior-superior rotator cuff tears. Purpose: To assess the effects of concomitant subscapularis tendon tear, which may reduce glenohumeral stability and force coupling, on clinical outcomes of SCR for irreparable posterior-superior rotator cuff tears. Study Design: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3. Methods: In total, 193 patients with irreparable posterior-superior rotator cuff tears underwent arthroscopic SCR using fascia lata autograft between 2007 and 2015. They were allocated to 3 groups: group 1, no subscapularis tear (160 patients); group 2, reparable subscapularis tear, which underwent arthroscopic repair (26 patients); and group 3, irreparable subscapularis tear (7 patients). American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) and Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) scores, visual analog scale (VAS) score for pain, active shoulder range of motion (ROM), muscle strength (manual muscle test), and acromiohumeral distance were evaluated before surgery and at final follow-up (mean, 3 years, 7 months; range, 2-11 years). Postoperative complications were assessed. Results: In groups 1 and 2, ASES, JOA, and VAS scores and shoulder ROM and muscle strength improved significantly after SCR with subscapularis repair ( P < .001). SCR in group 3 significantly improved ASES, JOA, and VAS scores ( P < .001), whereas shoulder ROM and muscle strength did not increase significantly. Postoperative acromiohumeral distance was significantly smaller in group 3 (5.7 ± 2.9 mm [mean ± SD]) than group 2 (9.1 ± 2.3 mm) ( P = .002). Group 3 had a significantly higher rate of graft tear ( P < .001) and postoperative infection ( P < .001) than group 1. Conclusion: The presence of subscapularis tendon tear affects clinical outcomes and complication rates after SCR. The reparability of the subscapularis affects superior glenohumeral stability; therefore, an intact subscapularis or reparable subscapularis tendon tear is the best indication for arthroscopic SCR in patients with irreparable posterior-superior rotator cuff tendon tears.

Hidden Long Head of the Biceps Tendon Instability and Concealed Intratendinous Subscapularis Tears

Background: Few studies have described the characteristics of a concealed intratendinous subscapularis tear (CIST), and there is a lack of research on the preoperative predictability of such lesions. Purpose: To describe the characteristics of a CIST as seen on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and intraoperatively and to develop a scoring system for predicting such lesions. Study Design: Case series; Level of evidence, 4. Methods: Retrospectively, we identified 43 patients with CISTs among 442 consecutive patients who had undergone rotator cuff repair from July 2014 to June 2016. Range of motion, visual analog scale results for pain and function, and patient-reported outcome scores were evaluated preoperatively and at 1 and 2 years postoperatively. CISTs were classified arthroscopically as small (<5 mm), medium (5-10 mm), and large (>10 mm). We performed repair (≥50%) or debridement (<50%) depending on the total subscapularis tendon tear size including the CIST. Preoperative MRI findings were analyzed by 2 observers and were correlated with the arthroscopic findings. A 10-point scoring system was developed based on characteristics during the physical examination (anterior tenderness, bear hug sign), MRI (biceps tendon displacement and subluxation, subscapularis signal change just lateral to the lesser tuberosity), and arthroscopic surgery (medial biceps tendon lesion, combined subscapularis tendon tear), with a cutoff value of ≥7 predicting a CIST. After the retrospective study, we prospectively enrolled 95 patients to validate the 10-point CIST scoring system. Results: All 43 patients diagnosed with a CIST during the retrospective study improved both range of motion and functional scores at 1 year postoperatively. The interrater agreement of the 2 observers was substantial for the evaluation of all parameters except for subscapularis tear classification, which was moderate. On arthroscopic surgery, 11 small, 19 medium, and 13 large CISTs were detected. The preliminary prospective study showed a sensitivity of 61.9%, specificity of 94.3%, positive predictive value of 89.0%, negative predictive value of 75.7%, and accuracy of 80.0% when the cutoff value was set at ≥7 on the CIST scoring system. Conclusion: A CIST can be suspected using a combination of preoperative MRI and intra-articular diagnostic arthroscopic findings, but a definitive diagnosis requires an arthroscopic view. On the 10-point CIST scoring system, a score of ≥5 can be suggestive of a CIST, and a score of ≥7 is most likely to predict a CIST.

Association of high sensitivity C-reactive protein with tearing of the long head of the biceps tendon

Background This study proposed to investigate whether high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP) is an independent risk factor for long head of biceps tendon (LHBT) tear and whether hs-CRP can increase accuracy in diagnosing LHBT tear. Methods This study involved 582 shoulders of 557 consecutive patients who received arthroscopic examinations at the authors’ institution between January 2010 and July 2018. The strengths of associations between LHBT tear and various factors were determined by calculating the odds ratios (ORs), with 95% confidence intervals (CIs), using logistic regression analyses. The studied variables were demographic, physical, social, metabolic, comorbidity, hs-CRP, and pain on a visual analog scale (VAS) factors, as well as those related to rotator cuff tear (RCT). Significant factors in the multivariable logistic analysis were evaluated to determine their diagnostic values, including their likelihood ratios and post-test probabilities for LHBT tear. Results In the multivariable analysis, five variables were significant: age, retraction degree of Patte, subscapularis tendon tear, hs-CRP > 1 mg/L, and pain VAS (p ≤ 0.01). The best combination of determinations for diagnosing LHBT tear, which yielded a strong positive likelihood ratio of 19.07 and a high post-test probability of 96%, was age ≥ 67 years, subscapularis tendon tear, grade of Patte ≥2, hs-CRP > 1, and pain VAS ≥ 7. Conclusions Serum hs-CRP > 1 mg/L is an independent risk factor for LHBT tear, along with the expected risk factors of age, subscapularis tendon tear, retraction degree of Patte, and pain VAS. Serum hs-CRP > 1 mg/L increases the diagnostic accuracy for LHBT tear. Level of evidence Level IV, Clinical case series.

Relationship of Posterior Decentering of the Humeral Head with Tear Size and Fatty Degeneration in Rotator Cuff Tear

Background: Posterior decentering is not an uncommon finding on rotator cuff tear patients’ shoulder magnetic resonance imaging. No previous study has reported on the relationship between posterior decentering and rotator cuff tear.Methods: We assessed patients’ rotator cuff tear humeral head positions based on humeral?scapular alignment (HSA). Subjects were classified into centering and decentering groups based on a <2 mm or >2 mm HSA value, respectively. Differences in rotator cuff tear size, degree of tear, and fatty degeneration between the two groups were evaluated.Results: One hundred seventy-five patients (80 males, 95 females; mean age: 59.7 ± 6.5 years old) were selected as subjects (casecontrol study; level of evidence: 3). Tear size, degree of subscapularis tendon tear, and fatty degeneration of the supraspinatus, infraspinatus, and subscapularis muscles were significantly different between the two groups (<i>p</i><0.001, <i>p</i><0.001, <i>p</i><0.001).Conclusions: The occurrence of decentering was related to rotator cuff tear size, degree of subscapularis tendon tear, and fatty degeneration of the rotator cuff muscles.

The Diagnostic Value of Subscapularis Clinical Tests in the Postoperative Diagnosis of Subscapularis Retears: An Ultrasound-Comparative Trial

Background: Different physical examination tests have been used to preoperatively determine both the presence and size of a primary subscapularis tear. On the contrary, no clinical trial has yet been published to assess the diagnostic validity of the aforementioned tests in diagnosing subscapularis retears after arthroscopic subscapularis repair. Objective: To investigate the diagnostic value of the most commonly used clinical tests in the diagnosis of subscapularis tendon retears after arthroscopic repair. Methods: A retrospective (prospectively collected data) case series involving 37 patients who were suffering from symptomatic complete subscapularis tendon tear was conducted. All patients underwent an all-arthroscopic subscapularis repair with the same operative technique. They were postoperatively evaluated (final end point of follow-up: 12 months) with the use of ultrasound, Constant-Murlay score (CS), bear hug test, internal rotation lag sign, Napoleon test and lift-off test. Sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, positive and negative prognostic values were calculated for each test. Results: Shoulder function was significantly improved according to the final CS. The internal rotation lag sign was the most sensitive for the diagnosis of postoperative subscapularis retears, while the Napoleon sign had the highest specificity. Although postoperative clinical tests yielded no false negative findings, they were poorly predictive as for new ruptures. Ten patients (27%), who were found with a positive (for re-rupture), postoperative, clinical test, had a sonographically intact subscapularis tendon repair. Conclusion: We strongly support the use of subscapularis-specific clinical tests as a composite, in combination with a specific interpretation of their results. If all tests are found negative for retear, then we could assume that the arthroscopic repair remains intact and no further diagnostic examination might be necessary. On the contrary, if at least one subscapularis-specific clinical test is positive for retear, then the patient will likely require additional imaging control for definite diagnosis.