prose recall
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

66
(FIVE YEARS 0)

H-INDEX

19
(FIVE YEARS 0)

2016 ◽  
Vol 21 (2) ◽  
pp. 194-212 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sinikka Hiltunen ◽  
Gun-Viol Vik

Research Questions: The purpose of the present experiment was to study interpreters’ recall of spoken prose. Design: The prose recall of simultaneous and consecutive interpreters was compared to that of foreign language teachers and non-linguistic experts. The professional experience of participants (21–24 participants in each group) was 10 years as a aminimum. The auditory presentation of the prose passage to be recalled, divided into eleven speech sequences, resembled the working conditions of interpreters. Data: Transcripted prose recall recordings were analysed quantitatively through an idea unit measure and qualitatively through meaning-based expressions. Findings: The foreign language expert groups outperformed the non-linguistic experts in both quantitative and qualitative measures. Additionally, compared to foreign language teachers, interpreters indicated a better recall of time expressions and topic sentences, as well as of complicated emotional and causal expressions. The explanation for these findings could indicate expertise-dependent tendencies: possibly a continuous practising of careful listening and the demand for a quick comprehension of the source text under the extreme time pressure of interpreters’ work leads to better results in prose recall. However, the findings can only be generalized to a limited extent because the prose passage used contained only one or two expressions of each type studied in the qualitative analysis. Originality: The study differs from previous studies in that the memory of interpreters, and especially of consecutive interpreters, was studied for the first time with a prose recall measure. Significance: The prose recall test revealed that the abilities of careful listening and effective comprehension of coherence and causality seem to play a significant role in explaining memory functions of simultaneous and consecutive interpreters compared to those of foreign language teachers and non-linguistic experts.


Cortex ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 55 ◽  
pp. 148-166 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mark Rosenstein ◽  
Catherine Diaz-Asper ◽  
Peter W. Foltz ◽  
Brita Elvevåg
Keyword(s):  

Memory ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 22 (8) ◽  
pp. 1052-1059 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alan Baddeley ◽  
Bruce Rawlings ◽  
Amie Hayes
Keyword(s):  

2012 ◽  
Vol 8 (4S_Part_14) ◽  
pp. P511-P511
Author(s):  
Eric Vidoni ◽  
David Johnson ◽  
Cheryl Diao ◽  
Robyn Honea ◽  
Jeffrey Burns

2011 ◽  
Vol 42 (2) ◽  
pp. 391-400 ◽  
Author(s):  
C. J. A. Morgan ◽  
C. Gardener ◽  
G. Schafer ◽  
S. Swan ◽  
C. Demarchi ◽  
...  

BackgroundCannabis varies considerably in levels of its two major constituent cannabinoids – (delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) and cannabidiol (CBD). Recently, we found evidence that those who smoked cannabis containing detectable levels of CBD had fewer psychotic-like symptoms than those whose cannabis had no CBD. The present study aimed, first, to replicate those findings and, second, to determine whether protective effects of CBD may extend to other harms of cannabis, such as memory impairment and reduced psychological well-being.MethodA total of 120 current cannabis smokers, 66 daily users and 54 recreational users were classified into groups according to whether analysis of their hair revealed the presence or absence of CBD and high versus low levels of THC. All were assessed on measures of psychosis-like symptoms, memory (prose recall; source memory) and depression/anxiety.ResultsLower psychosis-like symptoms were found in those whose hair had CBD compared with those without. However, this was seen only in recreational users, who had higher levels of THC in their hair. Higher THC levels in hair were associated with increased depression and anxiety. Prose recall and source memory were poorer in daily users with high THC levels in hair while recognition memory was better in individuals with CBD present in hair.ConclusionsCBD attenuates the psychotic-like effects of cannabis over time in recreational users. Higher THC negatively impacts on memory and psychological well-being. These findings raise concerns for the harms stemming from use of varieties such as ‘skunk’ (sensimillia), which lack any CBD but currently dominate the supply of cannabis in many countries.


2010 ◽  
Vol 197 (4) ◽  
pp. 285-290 ◽  
Author(s):  
Celia J. A. Morgan ◽  
Gráinne Schafer ◽  
Tom P. Freeman ◽  
H. Valerie Curran

BackgroundThe two main constituents of cannabis, cannabidiol and δ9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC), have opposing effects both pharmacologically and behaviourally when administered in the laboratory. Street cannabis is known to contain varying levels of each cannabinoid.AimsTo study how the varying levels of cannabidiol and THC have an impact on the acute effects of the drug in naturalistic settings.MethodCannabis users (n = 134) were tested 7 days apart on measures of memory and psychotomimetic symptoms, once while they were drug free and once while acutely intoxicated by their own chosen smoked cannabis. Using an unprecedented methodology, a sample of cannabis (as well as saliva) was collected from each user and analysed for levels of cannabinoids. On the basis of highest and lowest cannabidiol content of cannabis, two groups of individuals were directly compared.ResultsGroups did not differ in the THC content of the cannabis they smoked. Unlike the marked impairment in prose recall of individuals who smoked cannabis low in cannabidiol, participants smoking cannabis high in cannabidiol showed no memory impairment. Cannabidiol content did not affect psychotomimetic symptoms, which were elevated in both groups when intoxicated.ConclusionsThe antagonistic effects of cannabidiol at the CB1 receptor are probably responsible for its profile in smoked cannabis, attenuating the memory-impairing effects of THC. In terms of harm reduction, users should be made aware of the higher risk of memory impairment associated with smoking low-cannabidiol strains of cannabis like ‘skunk’ and encouraged to use strains containing higher levels of cannabidiol.


2010 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sean H. K. Kang ◽  
Hal Pashler ◽  
Doug Rohrer

2008 ◽  
Vol 13 (2) ◽  
pp. 273-289 ◽  
Author(s):  
Karen Oaksford ◽  
Mike Oaksford ◽  
Mohammad Ashraf ◽  
Gillian Fitzgibbon

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document