multiplicative error
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

115
(FIVE YEARS 31)

H-INDEX

13
(FIVE YEARS 2)

2022 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrija Mihoci ◽  
Christopher Hian-Ann Ting ◽  
Meng-Jou Lu ◽  
Kainat Khowaja

2021 ◽  
Vol 17 (3) ◽  
pp. 1-44
Author(s):  
Daniel Lokshtanov ◽  
Andreas BjÖrklund ◽  
Saket Saurabh ◽  
Meirav Zehavi

Recently, Brand et al. [STOC 2018] gave a randomized mathcal O(4 k m ε -2 -time exponential-space algorithm to approximately compute the number of paths on k vertices in a graph G up to a multiplicative error of 1 ± ε based on exterior algebra. Prior to our work, this has been the state-of-the-art. In this article, we revisit the algorithm by Alon and Gutner [IWPEC 2009, TALG 2010], and obtain the following results: • We present a deterministic 4 k + O (√ k (log k +log 2 ε -1 )) m -time polynomial-space algorithm. This matches the running time of the best known deterministic polynomial-space algorithm for deciding whether a given graph G has a path on k vertices. • Additionally, we present a randomized 4 k +mathcal O(log k (log k +logε -1 )) m -time polynomial-space algorithm. Our algorithm is simple—we only make elementary use of the probabilistic method. Here, n and m are the number of vertices and the number of edges, respectively. Additionally, our approach extends to approximate counting of other patterns of small size (such as q -dimensional p -matchings).


Author(s):  
Hong Liu ◽  
Péter Pál Pach ◽  
Richárd Palincza

Abstract A set of integers is primitive if it does not contain an element dividing another. Let f(n) denote the number of maximum-size primitive subsets of {1,…,2n}. We prove that the limit α = lim n→∞ f(n)1/n exists. Furthermore, we present an algorithm approximating α with (1 + ε) multiplicative error in N(ε) steps, showing in particular that α ≈ 1.318. Our algorithm can be adapted to estimate the number of all primitive sets in {1,…,n} as well. We address another related problem of Cameron and Erdős. They showed that the number of sets containing pairwise coprime integers in {1,…n} is between ${2^{\pi (n)}} \cdot {e^{(1/2 + o(1))\sqrt n }}$ and ${2^{\pi (n)}} \cdot {e^{(2 + o(1))\sqrt n }}$ . We show that neither of these bounds is tight: there are in fact ${2^{\pi (n)}} \cdot {e^{(1 + o(1))\sqrt n }}$ such sets.


2021 ◽  
Vol 1 (19) ◽  
pp. 207-209
Author(s):  
K.Yu. Gorbunov

For any weighted directed chain-cycle graphs a and b (referred to as structures) and any equal costs of operations (intermergings and duplication), we obtain an algorithm which, by successively applying these operations to a, outputs b if the first structure contains no paralogs (edges with a repeated name) and the second has no more than two paralogs for each edge. The algorithm has a multiplicative error of at most 13/9 + ε, where ε is any strictly positive number, and its runtime is of the order of no(ε–2.6), where n is the size of the initial pair of graphs. We also obtain algorithms for reconstruction of the evolution of genome structures with a condition on ancestor structures and along the phylogenetic tree.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document