epitope density
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

42
(FIVE YEARS 2)

H-INDEX

19
(FIVE YEARS 2)

2019 ◽  
Vol 204 (2) ◽  
pp. 335-347 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zhilin Chen ◽  
Wei-Yun Wholey ◽  
Alireza Hassani Najafabadi ◽  
James J. Moon ◽  
Irina Grigorova ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 113 ◽  
pp. 120-125 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gabriela L. Cosma ◽  
Laurence C. Eisenlohr

2017 ◽  
Vol 65 (8) ◽  
pp. 463-477 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kodela Vani ◽  
Seshi R. Sompuram ◽  
Anika K. Schaedle ◽  
Anuradha Balasubramanian ◽  
Monika Pilichowska ◽  
...  

Clinical Immunohistochemistry (IHC) laboratories face unique challenges in performing accurate and reproducible immunostains. Among these challenges is the use of homemade controls derived from pathological discard samples. Such positive controls have an unknown number of analyte molecules per cell (epitope density). It is unclear how the lack of defined analyte concentrations affects performance of the control. To address this question, we prepared positive IHC controls ( IHControls) for human epidermal growth factor receptor type II (HER-2), estrogen receptor (ER), or progesterone receptor (PR) with well-defined, homogeneous, and reproducible analyte concentrations. Using the IHControls, we examined the effect of analyte concentration on IHC control sensitivity. IHControls and conventional tissue controls were evaluated in a series of simulated primary antibody reagent degradation experiments. The data demonstrate that the ability of a positive IHC control to reveal reagent degradation depends on (1) the analyte concentration in the control and (2) where that concentration falls on the immunostain’s analytic response curve. The most sensitive positive IHC controls have analyte concentrations within or close to the immunostain’s concentration-dependent response range. Strongly staining positive controls having analyte concentrations on the analytic response curve plateau are less sensitive. These findings emphasize the importance of selecting positive IHC controls that are of intermediate (rather than strong) stain intensity.


BMC Genomics ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 14 (Suppl 6) ◽  
pp. S4 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anderson R Santos ◽  
Vanessa Bastos Pereira ◽  
Eudes Barbosa ◽  
Jan Baumbach ◽  
Josch Pauling ◽  
...  

PLoS ONE ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 7 (9) ◽  
pp. e38670 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thomas Stranzl ◽  
Mette V. Larsen ◽  
Ole Lund ◽  
Morten Nielsen ◽  
Søren Brunak

Langmuir ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 28 (38) ◽  
pp. 13616-13623 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xiang-Lin Meng ◽  
Yan Fang ◽  
Ling-Shu Wan ◽  
Xiao-Jun Huang ◽  
Zhi-Kang Xu

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document