nursing retention
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

25
(FIVE YEARS 4)

H-INDEX

7
(FIVE YEARS 1)

2021 ◽  
Vol 25 (3) ◽  
pp. 226-232
Author(s):  
Abby Mitchell ◽  
Colleen A. Maykut

The issue of new graduates prematurely exiting the profession has a long-standing, complicated history in nursing. Current retention is further complicated by the COVID-19 pandemic. The state of the global workforce and transition shock theory situate this issue. Ray's theory of bureaucratic caring frames the analysis with proposed recommendations for individual nurses, healthcare organizations, and academia. The sociocultural and political domains of Ray's theory offer guidance for nurse leaders in academic and practice settings. The importance of a collaborative relationship between academic and practice settings is vital to mitigate the phenomenon of early exit of new graduates.


2020 ◽  
Vol 32 (4) ◽  
pp. 218-228 ◽  
Author(s):  
Luma Ghazi Al Zamel ◽  
Khatijah Lim Abdullah ◽  
Chong Mei Chan ◽  
Chua Yan Piaw

Nursing retention is a critical issue for organization. High nurses’ turnover impact negatively on an organization requirement to meet patient needs and quality care. This integrative review aims to critically review and synthesize published studies to obtain better understanding of the determinants of nurse’s intention to leave or stay in the organization. Thirty-seven studies which met the inclusion criteria from different locations using a variety of instruments and research designs were identified using PRISMA guideline. Many factors including job satisfaction, organizational commitment, quality of work life, work environment, leadership style, bullying at work, family reason, and job security were identified to be associated negatively with nurse’s intention to leave and positively with intention to stay in organization. More qualitative studies are needed to understand in depth, the reasons and factors that underlie and influence turnover, intention to leave or remain in organization.


2019 ◽  
Vol 29 (3) ◽  
pp. 199-200
Author(s):  
María Idalia Sepúlveda-Schaaf ◽  
María Consuelo Cerón-Mackay
Keyword(s):  

2018 ◽  
Vol 35 (6) ◽  
pp. 417-427 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paula R. Mahon

Pediatric hematology/oncology units (PHOUs) are highly paced, stressful environments and can be difficult areas to work. Thus, these units can present issues when it comes to both recruiting and retaining health care professionals (HCPs). There is scant research addressing how the environment of a PHOU contribute to a HCP’s desire to stay or leave this environment. To conduct this project, a critical ethnographic approach was used. The researcher conducted semistructured interviews ( n = 29), which included nurses ( n = 21), physicians ( n = 4), and allied health care staff ( n = 4). This sample represented approximately one third of staff in each category. Participants identified that their ability to develop long-term relationships with children and families as a significant source of satisfaction. Belonging to the oncology team was seen as extraordinarily important to all the participants. The majority of the participants also felt that working in this ever-evolving dynamic medical field afforded them with ongoing learning opportunities. The main frustration described by participants pertained to administrative involvement in the everyday workings of the PHOU, potentially leading to attrition. It is important to note that there was also diversity among and between the categories of HCPs when describing the work environment and the issues that most influence them. While similarities among participants were found between satisfaction and dissatisfaction, significant differences between them led us to believe it would be unreasonable to attempt to compare the three groups here. Thus, in this article the author focused primarily on nursing while noting related observations from physicians and allied health professions.


2018 ◽  
Vol 34 (1) ◽  
pp. 31-37 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michelle Hopson ◽  
Laura Petri ◽  
Joseph Kufera

2016 ◽  
Vol 40 (3) ◽  
pp. 269-275 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mary Ellen Bonczek ◽  
Ann Quinlan-Colwell ◽  
Stephanie Tran ◽  
Kathy Wines

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document