Modifying Highway Capacity Manual Methodology for Inclusion of Flashing-Yellow-Arrow Delay and Suppression

Dallas phasing is an effective strategy for increasing the efficiency of protected-permissive left turns (PPLTs) at signalized intersections, without creating left-turn traps. The flashing yellow arrow (FYA) is the most widely used PPLT signal indication when Dallas phasing is utilized. The Highway Capacity Manual (HCM) signalized intersection methodology currently contains guidance on how to handle PPLTs with Dallas phasing. At intersections with the FYA indication, some agencies have been using a feature known as FYA delay, which delays the FYA indication, usually by 1 to 4 s. More recently, some agencies have also began using another feature, which suppresses the FYA when a conflicting pedestrian phase is active. The HCM does not contain guidance on how to handle FYA delay or suppression. This research proposed modifications to the HCM signalized intersection methodology to address these two FYA strategies. A sensitivity analysis was conducted to check the reasonableness of the proposed modifications. The sensitivity analysis showed that the proposed modifications are reasonable and produced the expected results.

Protected–permissive left turn phasing with flashing yellow arrow signal: study of red intervals for an effective phase transition

Protected–permissive left turn (PPLT) phasing has been popular and widely used in many urban intersections in North America because of its operational benefits. A significant number of intersections have recently been upgraded with four-section signal heads with flashing yellow arrow (FYA) indication for an effective protected–permissive left turn operation. The present study seeks to find appropriate length of two red intervals whose roles are important, but different during the transition period of FYA-PPLT phasing. One is a red interval for delayed-start of permissive left turn movements; the other is additional red interval for delayed-start of opposing through movements. Micro-traffic simulation and conflict analysis are explored to assess the effects of the red intervals on intersection efficiency and safety. A useful reference, which describes the balanced length of the two red intervals under varying traffic levels, is developed as a result.

Evaluation of Driver Comprehension and Visual Attention of the Flashing Yellow Arrow Display for Permissive Right Turns

This research explored driver comprehension and behaviors in Oregon with respect to right-turn signal displays focusing on the Flashing Yellow Arrow (FYA) in a driving simulator. A counterbalanced, factorial design was chosen to explore three independent variables: signal indication type and active display, length of the right-turn bay, and presence of pedestrians. Driver decision-making and visual attention were considered. Data were obtained from 46 participants (21 women, 25 men) turning right 736 times in 16 experimental scenarios. A Mixed-effects Ordered Probit Model and a Linear mixed model were used to examine the influence of driver demographics on observed performance. Results suggest that the FYA indication improves driver comprehension and behavioral responses to the permissive right-turn condition. When presented with the FYA indication in the presence of pedestrians, nearly all drivers exhibited caution while turning and yielding to pedestrians and stopping when necessary. For the same turning maneuver, drivers presented with a circular green (CG) indication were less likely to exhibit correct behavior. At least for Oregon drivers, another clear finding was a general lack of understanding of the steady red arrow (SRA) display for right turns. Most drivers assume the SRA indication requires a different response than the circular red (CR) and remain stopped during the entire red interval, thus resulting in efficiency losses. These findings suggest that transportation agencies could potentially improve driver yielding behavior and pedestrian safety at signalized intersections with high volumes of permissive right turns from exclusive right-turn lanes by using the FYA display in lieu of a steady CG display.

Operational Impacts of Protected-Permitted Right-Turn Phasing and Pavement Markings on Bicyclist Performance during Conflicts with Right-Turning Vehicles

Conflict between bicycles and right-turning vehicles on the approach to signalized intersections is a critical safety concern. To understand the operational implications of protected-permitted right-turn signal indications in conjunction with pavement markings on bicyclist performance, a full-scale bicycling simulator experiment was performed. Velocity and lateral position of bicyclists were evaluated during conflicts between bicycles and right-turning vehicles. A mixed factorial design was considered. Two within-subject factors were analyzed: the signal indication for right-turning vehicles with five levels (circular red, circular green, solid red arrow, solid green arrow, and flashing yellow arrow), and the pavement markings in the conflict area with two levels (white lane markings with no supplemental pavement color and white lane markings with solid green pavement applied in the conflict area). Additionally, the influence of gender as a between-subject variable was considered. Forty-eight participants (24 female) completed the experiment. Signal indications and pavement markings had statistically significant effects on bicyclist velocity and lateral position, but these effects varied at different factor levels. Additionally, during the conflicts, male participants were found to have higher velocity than female participants. This difference was not influenced by engineering treatments. The results provide guidance to transportation professionals about how traffic control devices could be applied to conflict areas on the approach to signalized intersections.

Safety Effects of Flashing Yellow Arrows Used in Protected Permitted Phasing: Comparison of Full Bayes and Empirical Bayes Results

Using the flashing yellow arrow (FYA) signal indication for the permissive portion of protected-permissive left-turn (PPLT) phasing has become an increasingly popular treatment for left-turn signals as drivers are believed to understand the FYA better than the traditional circular green indication. A before-and-after safety evaluation of deploying FYA at PPLT signals at 28 intersections in Virginia was conducted. Each of the study intersections had FYA for the permitted portion of the phase on at least one left-turn approach. The focus was on left-turns that operated in the protected-permissive mode (with circular green indication for the permissive portion) before being converted to PPLT operations with the FYA indication for the permissive portion (PPLT-FYA). Crash records from before and after the activation of FYA were compared using both the full Bayes and empirical Bayes approaches. The results indicate that using the FYA signal indication instead of the circular green indication had a statistically significant effect in reducing overall frequency and severity of crashes. For the intersections studied in this research, total crashes reduced by 12% following conversion from PPLT to PPLT–FYA. The results also indicated that the full Bayes approach to safety effectiveness evaluation can, at a minimum, provide similar results to the well-established empirical Bayes approach. The 95% credible intervals for the expected crash reduction rates estimated with the full Bayes method were generally narrow, suggesting a good degree of confidence in the estimates.