Polynomially Bounding the Number of Minimal Separators in Graphs: Reductions, Sufficient Conditions, and a Dichotomy Theorem

A graph class is said to be tame if graphs in the class have a polynomially bounded number of minimal separators. Tame graph classes have good algorithmic properties, which follow, for example, from an algorithmic metatheorem of Fomin, Todinca, and Villanger from 2015. We show that a hereditary graph class $\mathcal{G}$ is tame if and only if the subclass consisting of graphs in $\mathcal{G}$ without clique cutsets is tame. This result and Ramsey's theorem lead to several types of sufficient conditions for a graph class to be tame. In particular, we show that any hereditary class of graphs of bounded clique cover number that excludes some complete prism is tame, where a complete prism is the Cartesian product of a complete graph with a $K_2$. We apply these results, combined with constructions of graphs with exponentially many minimal separators, to develop a dichotomy theorem separating tame from non-tame graph classes within the family of graph classes defined by sets of forbidden induced subgraphs with at most four vertices.

Chapter 16. Worst-Case Upper Bounds

The chapter is a survey of ideas and techniques behind satisfiability algorithms with the currently best asymptotic upper bounds on the worst-case running time. The survey also includes related structural-complexity topics such as Schaefer’s dichotomy theorem, reductions between various restricted cases of SAT, the exponential time hypothesis, etc.

The complexity of frugal colouring

A t-frugal colouring of a graph G is an assignment of colours to the vertices of G, such that each colour appears at most t times in the neighbourhood of any vertex. A dichotomy theorem for the complexity of deciding whether a graph has a 1-frugal colouring with k colours was found by McCormick and Thomas, and then later extended to restricted graph classes by Kratochvil and Siggers. We generalize the McCormick and Thomas theorem by proving a dichotomy theorem for the complexity of deciding whether a graph has a t-frugal colouring with k colours, for all pairs of positive integers t and k. We also generalize bounds of Lih et al. for the number of colours needed in a 1-frugal colouring of a given $$K_4$$ K 4 -minor-free graph with maximum degree $$\Delta $$ Δ to t-frugal colourings, for any positive integer t.

LARGE CARDINALS BEYOND CHOICE

The HOD Dichotomy Theorem states that if there is an extendible cardinal, δ, then either HOD is “close” to V (in the sense that it correctly computes successors of singular cardinals greater than δ) or HOD is “far” from V (in the sense that all regular cardinals greater than or equal to δ are measurable in HOD). The question is whether the future will lead to the first or the second side of the dichotomy. Is HOD “close” to V, or “far” from V? There is a program aimed at establishing the first alternative—the “close” side of the HOD Dichotomy. This is the program of inner model theory. In recent years the third author has provided evidence that there is an ultimate inner model—Ultimate-L—and he has isolated a natural conjecture associated with the model—the Ultimate-L Conjecture. This conjecture implies that (assuming the existence of an extendible cardinal) that the first alternative holds—HOD is “close” to V. This is the future in which pattern prevails. In this paper we introduce a very different program, one aimed at establishing the second alternative—the “far” side of the HOD Dichotomy. This is the program of large cardinals beyond choice. Kunen famously showed that if AC holds then there cannot be a Reinhardt cardinal. It has remained open whether Reinhardt cardinals are consistent in ZF alone. It turns out that there is an entire hierarchy of choiceless large cardinals of which Reinhardt cardinals are only the beginning, and, surprisingly, this hierarchy appears to be highly ordered and amenable to systematic investigation, as we shall show in this paper. The point is that if these choiceless large cardinals are consistent then the Ultimate-L Conjecture must fail. This is the future where chaos prevails.