carbon dioxide leakage
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

18
(FIVE YEARS 3)

H-INDEX

6
(FIVE YEARS 1)

2021 ◽  
Vol 35 (1) ◽  
pp. 78-84
Author(s):  
Ho-Jung Kang ◽  
Chae-Chil Koo ◽  
Ki-Hyuk Jung ◽  
Jae-Wook Choi

The safety of carbon dioxide fire extinguishing facilities is studied through a fundamental case analysis of leakage accidents in carbon dioxide fire extinguishing facilities. In Korea, since 2001, there have been 11 accidents caused by leaks from carbon dioxide fire extinguishing facilities, killing 9 people and injuring more than 60 others. Recently, three subcontractors inhaled CO<sub>2</sub> gas from a transportation passage outside a collection chamber, killing two of them and injuring the other. This incident brought social attention to the CO<sub>2</sub> fire extinguishing facility in the first basement of S Electronics. In this study, we analyze the cause of the accident (e.g., pressure and temperature changes in the carbon dioxide leakage process) using a one-dimensional transient model, the effects of oxygen and CO<sub>2</sub> concentration at the location of the incident, and that these results can be used as basic data to prevent suffocation disaster in carbon dioxide fire extinguishing facilities.


2020 ◽  
Vol 163 (2) ◽  
pp. 787-806
Author(s):  
Manuel Wifling

AbstractThe phenomenon of anthropogenic climate change has been identified as a threat multiplier for many human-related concerns. Carbon capture and storage (CCS) can, in combination with several other mitigation technologies, alleviate global warming by reducing carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions. Reducing climate change-related risks via CCS creates another risk, smaller in extent: the risk that some of the stored CO2 leaks out of the storage complex. This article reviews European legislation and evaluates how one of its objectives, that private liabilities of CCS-related leakage risks are not socialized, is ensured. Slight modifications of European legislation are suggested in order to prevent an indefinite liability of CCS operators in case a storage complex turns out to be unexpectedly and unavoidably prone to CO2 leakages. Official German and Hungarian financial precaution specifications are contrasted and related to this article’s finding that the state budget is sufficiently hedged against the expected value of climate-related leakage compensation costs of poorly managed storage complexes if 3 to 6% of a CCS operator’s emission-related revenues are diverted into a financial precaution fund.


2016 ◽  
Vol 52 (7) ◽  
pp. 5676-5686 ◽  
Author(s):  
Linwei Hu ◽  
Peter Bayer ◽  
Ralf Brauchler

2016 ◽  
Vol 44 ◽  
pp. 290-299 ◽  
Author(s):  
Diana H. Bacon ◽  
Nikolla P. Qafoku ◽  
Zhenxue Dai ◽  
Elizabeth H. Keating ◽  
Christopher F. Brown

2015 ◽  
Vol 36 ◽  
pp. 51-59 ◽  
Author(s):  
I. Fernández-Montiel ◽  
M. Touceda ◽  
A. Pedescoll ◽  
R. Gabilondo ◽  
A. Prieto-Fernández ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document