replication fork stalling
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

28
(FIVE YEARS 5)

H-INDEX

13
(FIVE YEARS 2)

Author(s):  
Erin Bonnell ◽  
Emeline Pasquier ◽  
Raymund J. Wellinger

Eukaryotic genomes are highly complex and divided into linear chromosomes that require end protection from unwarranted fusions, recombination, and degradation in order to maintain genomic stability. This is accomplished through the conserved specialized nucleoprotein structure of telomeres. Due to the repetitive nature of telomeric DNA, and the unusual terminal structure, namely a protruding single stranded 3′ DNA end, completing telomeric DNA replication in a timely and efficient manner is a challenge. For example, the end replication problem causes a progressive shortening of telomeric DNA at each round of DNA replication, thus telomeres eventually lose their protective capacity. This phenomenon is counteracted by the recruitment and the activation at telomeres of the specialized reverse transcriptase telomerase. Despite the importance of telomerase in providing a mechanism for complete replication of telomeric ends, the majority of telomere replication is in fact carried out by the conventional DNA replication machinery. There is significant evidence demonstrating that progression of replication forks is hampered at chromosomal ends due to telomeric sequences prone to form secondary structures, tightly DNA-bound proteins, and the heterochromatic nature of telomeres. The telomeric loop (t-loop) formed by invasion of the 3′-end into telomeric duplex sequences may also impede the passage of replication fork. Replication fork stalling can lead to fork collapse and DNA breaks, a major cause of genomic instability triggered notably by unwanted repair events. Moreover, at chromosomal ends, unreplicated DNA distal to a stalled fork cannot be rescued by a fork coming from the opposite direction. This highlights the importance of the multiple mechanisms involved in overcoming fork progression obstacles at telomeres. Consequently, numerous factors participate in efficient telomeric DNA duplication by preventing replication fork stalling or promoting the restart of a stalled replication fork at telomeres. In this review, we will discuss difficulties associated with the passage of the replication fork through telomeres in both fission and budding yeasts as well as mammals, highlighting conserved mechanisms implicated in maintaining telomere integrity during replication, thus preserving a stable genome.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Goro Doi ◽  
Satoshi Okada ◽  
Takehiro Yasukawa ◽  
Yuki Sugiyama ◽  
Siqin Bala ◽  
...  

Abstract Catalytically inactive Cas9 (dCas9) has become an increasingly popular tool for targeted gene activation/inactivation, live-cell imaging, and base editing. While dCas9 was reported to induce base substitutions and indels, it has not been associated with structural variations. Here, we show that dCas9 impedes replication fork progression to destabilize tandem repeats in budding yeast. When targeted to the CUP1 array comprising ∼16 repeat units, dCas9 induced its contraction in most cells, especially in the presence of nicotinamide. Replication intermediate analysis demonstrated replication fork stalling in the vicinity of dCas9-bound sites. Genetic analysis indicated that while destabilization is counteracted by the replisome progression complex components Ctf4 and Mrc1 and the accessory helicase Rrm3, it involves single-strand annealing by the recombination proteins Rad52 and Rad59. Although dCas9-mediated replication fork stalling is a potential risk in conventional applications, it may serve as a novel tool for both mechanistic studies and manipulation of genomic instability.


2020 ◽  
Vol 295 (25) ◽  
pp. 8363-8373 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paula A. Agudelo Garcia ◽  
Callie M. Lovejoy ◽  
Prabakaran Nagarajan ◽  
Dongju Park ◽  
Liudmila V. Popova ◽  
...  

The replisome is a protein complex on the DNA replication fork and functions in a dynamic environment at the intersection of parental and nascent chromatin. Parental nucleosomes are disrupted in front of the replication fork. The daughter DNA duplexes are packaged with an equal amount of parental and newly synthesized histones in the wake of the replication fork through the activity of the replication-coupled chromatin assembly pathway. Histone acetyltransferase 1 (HAT1) is responsible for the cytosolic diacetylation of newly synthesized histone H4 on lysines 5 and 12, which accompanies replication-coupled chromatin assembly. Here, using proximity ligation assay-based chromatin assembly assays and DNA fiber analysis, we analyzed the role of murine HAT1 in replication-coupled chromatin assembly. We demonstrate that HAT1 physically associates with chromatin near DNA replication sites. We found that the association of HAT1 with newly replicated DNA is transient, but can be stabilized by replication fork stalling. The association of HAT1 with nascent chromatin may be functionally relevant, as HAT1 loss decreased replication fork progression and increased replication fork stalling. Moreover, in the absence of HAT1, stalled replication forks were unstable, and newly synthesized DNA became susceptible to MRE11-dependent degradation. These results suggest that HAT1 links replication fork function to the proper processing and assembly of newly synthesized histones.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paula A. Agudelo Garcia ◽  
Callie Lovejoy ◽  
Prabakaran Nagarajan ◽  
Dongju Park ◽  
Liudmila Popova ◽  
...  

ABSTRACTThe replisome functions in a dynamic environment that is at the intersection of parental and nascent chromatin. Parental nucleosomes are disrupted in front of the replication fork. The daughter duplexes are packaged with an equal amount of parental and newly synthesized histones in the wake of the replication fork through the action of the replication-coupled chromatin assembly pathway. Histone acetyltransferase 1 (Hat1) is responsible for the cytosolic diacetylation of newly synthesized histone H4 on lysines 5 and 12 that accompanies replication-coupled chromatin assembly. Analysis of the role of Hat1 in replication-coupled chromatin assembly demonstrates that Hat1 also physically associates with chromatin near sites of DNA replication. The association of Hat1 with newly replicated DNA is transient but can be stabilized by replication fork stalling. The association of Hat1 with nascent chromatin may be functionally relevant as loss of Hat1 results in a decrease in replication fork progression and an increase in replication fork stalling. In addition, in the absence of Hat1, stalled replication forks are unstable and newly synthesized DNA becomes susceptible to Mre11-dependent degradation. These results suggest that Hat1 links replication fork function to the proper processing and assembly of newly synthesized histones.


2019 ◽  
Vol 47 (19) ◽  
pp. 10151-10165 ◽  
Author(s):  
Julieta Martino ◽  
Gregory J Brunette ◽  
Jonathan Barroso-González ◽  
Tatiana N Moiseeva ◽  
Chelsea M Smith ◽  
...  

AbstractRAD51 plays a central role in homologous recombination during double-strand break repair and in replication fork dynamics. Misregulation of RAD51 is associated with genetic instability and cancer. RAD51 is regulated by many accessory proteins including the highly conserved Shu complex. Here, we report the function of the human Shu complex during replication to regulate RAD51 recruitment to DNA repair foci and, secondly, during replication fork restart following replication fork stalling. Deletion of the Shu complex members, SWS1 and SWSAP1, using CRISPR/Cas9, renders cells specifically sensitive to the replication fork stalling and collapse caused by methyl methanesulfonate and mitomycin C exposure, a delayed and reduced RAD51 response, and fewer sister chromatid exchanges. Our additional analysis identified SPIDR and PDS5B as novel Shu complex interacting partners and genetically function in the same pathway upon DNA damage. Collectively, our study uncovers a protein complex, which consists of SWS1, SWSAP1, SPIDR and PDS5B, involved in DNA repair and provides insight into Shu complex function and composition.


Cell Cycle ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 17 (5) ◽  
pp. 568-579 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sofia Henriksson ◽  
Petra Groth ◽  
Nina Gustafsson ◽  
Thomas Helleday

Nucleus ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 7 (5) ◽  
pp. 498-511 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrew M. Cobb ◽  
Thomas V. Murray ◽  
Derek T. Warren ◽  
Yiwen Liu ◽  
Catherine M. Shanahan

2016 ◽  
Vol 16 (2) ◽  
pp. 70-70
Author(s):  
Gemma K. Alderton

2014 ◽  
Vol 111 (42) ◽  
pp. 15190-15195 ◽  
Author(s):  
Edwin Chen ◽  
Jong Sook Ahn ◽  
Charlie E. Massie ◽  
David Clynes ◽  
Anna L. Godfrey ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document