Hybrid Method of Video Shot Segmentation Based on YCbCr Space Color Model

In this digital world, Video analysis is the most important and useful task. Currently, tremendous tasks have been done in video analysis like compressing the videos, video retrieval process and video database indexing, etc. For all these tasks, one common step is segmenting the video shots, which are referred to as Video Shots Segmentation (VSS). Video shots segmentation is used to segment the input videos into a number of frames sequentially where the scene changes occurred, i.e. called shots. In this article, segmenting the video shots follows a hybrid procedure. Here, we have introduced the moments of colors, distance metrics and threshold techniques. All the videos follow the above mentioned steps for segmenting the video shots. But, before that, the input video is converted into a specific color model i.e. YCbCr. Then, apply the color moments to extract the feature vectors of frames, which are differentiated based on the color features of frames. In every two frames of the video, distance metrics methods are applying to compute the similarity and dissimilarity of frames. And the dissimilarity of the frames can be computed by using the threshold technique to get the shots from the video. In this paper, we are using the adaptive threshold technique to segment the videos into various shots. In this step, we will get a true number of shots. By the experimental results, this proposed methodology can be evaluated with the sequence of videos based on the performance or evaluation metrics.

Errata for trial publications are not uncommon, are frequently not trivial, and can be challenging to access: a retrospective review

Objective: The research sought to determine the prevalence of errata for drug trial publications that are included in systematic reviews, their potential value to reviews, and their accessibility via standard information retrieval methods.Methods: The authors conducted a retrospective review of included studies from forty systematic reviews of drugs evaluated by the Canadian Agency for Drugs and Technologies in Health (CADTH) Common Drug Review (CDR) in 2015. For each article that was included in the systematic reviews, we conducted searches for associated errata using the CDR review report, PubMed, and the journal publishers’ websites. The severity of errors described in errata was evaluated using a three-category scale: trivial, minor, or major. The accessibility of errata was determined by examining inclusion in bibliographic databases, costs of obtaining errata, time lag between article and erratum publication, and correction of online articles.Results: The 40 systematic reviews included 127 articles in total, for which 26 errata were identified. These errata described 38 errors. When classified by severity, 6 errors were major; 20 errors were minor; and 12 errors were trivial. No one database contained all the errata. On average, errata were published 211 days after the original article (range: 15–1,036 days). All were freely available. Over one-third (9/24) of online articles were uncorrected after errata publication.Conclusion: Errata frequently described non-trivial errors that would either impact the interpretation of data in the article or, in fewer cases, impact the conclusions of the study. As such, it seems useful for reviewers to identify errata associated with included studies. However, publication time lag and inconsistent database indexing impair errata accessibility.

A failed attempt at developing a search filter for systematic review methodology articles in Ovid Embase

Objectives: This paper describes the development, execution, and subsequent failure of an attempt to create an Ovid Embase search filter for locating systematic review methodology articles.Methods: The authors devised a work plan, based on best practices, for search filter development that has been outlined in the literature. Three reference samples were gathered by identifying the OVID Embase records for specific articles that were included in the PubMed Systematic Review Methods subset. The first sample was analyzed to develop a set of keywords and subject headings to include in the search filter. The second and third samples would have been used to calibrate the search filter and to calculate filter sensitivity and precision, respectively.Results: Technical shortcomings, database indexing practices, and the fuzzy nature of keyword terminology relevant to the topic prevented us from designing the search filter.Conclusion: Creating a search filter to identify systematic review methodology articles in Ovid Embase is not possible at this time.