virus structures
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

43
(FIVE YEARS 3)

H-INDEX

9
(FIVE YEARS 2)

2021 ◽  
Vol 296 ◽  
pp. 100554 ◽  
Author(s):  
John E. Johnson ◽  
Arthur J. Olson

2019 ◽  
Vol 4 (11) ◽  
pp. 1778-1780 ◽  
Author(s):  
Frederic D. Bushman ◽  
Kevin McCormick ◽  
Scott Sherrill-Mix

2019 ◽  
Vol 36 ◽  
pp. 74-83 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ross Hartman ◽  
Jacob Munson-McGee ◽  
Mark J Young ◽  
Charles Martin Lawrence

2017 ◽  
Vol 73 (a2) ◽  
pp. C586-C586
Author(s):  
Ruslan Kurta ◽  
Jeffrey Donatelli ◽  
Chun Yoon ◽  
Andrew Aquila ◽  
Peter Zwart ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  

2017 ◽  
pp. 251-274 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jih Ru Hwu ◽  
Tapan K. Pradhan ◽  
Shwu-Chen Tsay ◽  
Mohit Kapoor ◽  
Sergey O. Bachurin ◽  
...  

2013 ◽  
Vol 46 (2) ◽  
pp. 133-180 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael G. Rossmann

AbstractThis review is a partially personal account of the discovery of virus structure and its implication for virus function. Although I have endeavored to cover all aspects of structural virology and to acknowledge relevant individuals, I know that I have favored taking examples from my own experience in telling this story. I am anxious to apologize to all those who I might have unintentionally offended by omitting their work.The first knowledge of virus structure was a result of Stanley's studies of tobacco mosaic virus (TMV) and the subsequent X-ray fiber diffraction analysis by Bernal and Fankuchen in the 1930s. At about the same time it became apparent that crystals of small RNA plant and animal viruses could diffract X-rays, demonstrating that viruses must have distinct and unique structures. More advances were made in the 1950s with the realization by Watson and Crick that viruses might have icosahedral symmetry. With the improvement of experimental and computational techniques in the 1970s, it became possible to determine the three-dimensional, near-atomic resolution structures of some small icosahedral plant and animal RNA viruses. It was a great surprise that the protecting capsids of the first virus structures to be determined had the same architecture. The capsid proteins of these viruses all had a ‘jelly-roll’ fold and, furthermore, the organization of the capsid protein in the virus were similar, suggesting a common ancestral virus from which many of today's viruses have evolved. By this time a more detailed structure of TMV had also been established, but both the architecture and capsid protein fold were quite different to that of the icosahedral viruses. The small icosahedral RNA virus structures were also informative of how and where cellular receptors, anti-viral compounds, and neutralizing antibodies bound to these viruses. However, larger lipid membrane enveloped viruses did not form sufficiently ordered crystals to obtain good X-ray diffraction. Starting in the 1990s, these enveloped viruses were studied by combining cryo-electron microscopy of the whole virus with X-ray crystallography of their protein components. These structures gave information on virus assembly, virus neutralization by antibodies, and virus fusion with and entry into the host cell. The same techniques were also employed in the study of complex bacteriophages that were too large to crystallize. Nevertheless, there still remained many pleomorphic, highly pathogenic viruses that lacked the icosahedral symmetry and homogeneity that had made the earlier structural investigations possible. Currently some of these viruses are starting to be studied by combining X-ray crystallography with cryo-electron tomography.


2013 ◽  
Vol 87 (13) ◽  
pp. 7700-7707 ◽  
Author(s):  
V. A. Kostyuchenko ◽  
Q. Zhang ◽  
J. L. Tan ◽  
T.-S. Ng ◽  
S.-M. Lok

Author(s):  
Daniel Badia-Martinez ◽  
Hanna M. Oksanen ◽  
David I. Stuart ◽  
Nicola G. A. Abrescia

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document