surgeon general
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

1181
(FIVE YEARS 42)

H-INDEX

26
(FIVE YEARS 3)

2021 ◽  
pp. 301-319
Author(s):  
Joia S. Mukherjee

This chapter explores political will. While political will is often cited as a critical component of health programs around the world, it is a poorly defined concept. Using the framework of the late Dr. Julius Richmond, former U.S. Surgeon General, political will is interrogated through the interconnected factors of social strategy and science to advance policy. The COVID-19 pandemic is used as an example of this framework. The chapter also discusses the impact of colonialism and capitalism on the actualization of political will and leadership of impoverished countries. Challenges to sovereignty are addressed through the framework of necropolitics and social theories and practices that can improve responses. The chapter gives examples of regional and national leadership in the COVID-19 pandemic that have fought to decolonize the locus of power.


2021 ◽  
Vol 71 (4) ◽  
pp. 1508
Author(s):  
Adil Ali ◽  
Rusab Alam Khan ◽  
Muhammad Bin Humayun

An event was held at Army Medical College on the 10th of June, commemorating the 200th successful cochlear implant at Combined Military Hospital(CMH) Rawalpindi. The Surgeon General, Lt. Gen Nigar Johar HI (M), DG MS (IS) was the chief guest of the occasion. The event was attended by high rankingofficers of Army Medical Corps, faculty members and cadets of Army Medical College, as well as by some recipients of cochlear implants with their families.


Book 2 0 ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
pp. 19-35 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anna Ferrari

After the explosion of the AIDS epidemic in the United States was virtually ignored because it was mostly hitting the gay community, gay authors started to employ their work for two main purposes: to protest the situation and, particularly in the beginning, to spread information about the virus. The portrayal of physical details is one of the most interesting devices employed in AIDS texts. In the early AIDS years, when the cause of the epidemic was unknown, literary tools such as the list of symptoms were widely used: authors were addressing their own community, and gave people a way to recognize the early signs of illness, such as the night sweats and the Kaposi’s sarcoma lesions. Even after the discovery of HIV, when there was not a cure yet, AIDS texts represented a crucial source of information: the first official leaflet was provided by Surgeon General Koop in 1986. The act of incorporating medical information in literary texts was considered an act of service within the community: authors such as Paul Monette and Larry Kramer regarded the gay underground as a more credible source of information, since in the beginning people who had gotten through it often knew more than the doctors. Later on, as information became more available, the display of those same physical manifestations of the disease and of AIDS-ridden bodies became an effective way to denounce the persisting silence from the government, with works such as Kushner’s Angels in America and Wojnarowicz’s portraits of Peter Hujar’s body. This article focuses on how the display of symptoms and other physical manifestations of the epidemic turned the cultural production into a key element in shaping the discourse around AIDS, highlighting the evolution in the use of physical medical evidence – from information to outcry.


Surgery ◽  
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marisa A. Joel ◽  
Kris Kaulback ◽  
George J. Koenig ◽  
Charles J. Yeo ◽  
Joshua A. Marks
Keyword(s):  

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
David Lazer ◽  
Jon Green ◽  
Katherine Ognyanova ◽  
Matthew Baum ◽  
Jennifer Lin ◽  
...  

Earlier this month, we witnessed a vigorous back and forth between the White House and Facebook regarding the role of the company in circulating health misinformation. On the White House side, the Surgeon General released an Advisory declaring misinformation a public health threat to the nation, highlighting, in part, the role of social media. This was followed the next day by a pointed statement by President Biden-- “They’re killing us!” Facebook responded with a blog entry, Moving Past the Finger Pointing, asserting that it was not responsible for the plateauing vaccination rates in the US. The company pointed to the fact that 85% of Facebook users in a large survey by Carnegie Mellon (supported by Facebook) reported being vaccinated or wanting to be vaccinated. This exchange begs an obvious question: who has it right? Answering this question is tricky; but at minimum, rebutting the President’s accusation would require more information than is provided in Facebook’s blog post. For one thing, it fails to compare Facebook users to non-users. It also does not provide information on vaccination rates among those Facebook users who actually get information regarding COVID-19 from Facebook. As most Americans use Facebook, the vaccination rates among users will inevitably be similar to those of the general population. But only a subset of those users go to Facebook specifically to get news and information about COVID-19. These are the people who the Biden administration worries are at risk of exposure to vaccine misinformation.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document