differential performance
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

182
(FIVE YEARS 29)

H-INDEX

24
(FIVE YEARS 3)

Author(s):  
Isabel Tharigen ◽  
Joachim Protze ◽  
Fabian Orland ◽  
Marc-Andre Hermanns

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lane Donnelly ◽  
Matthew Wood ◽  
Jean Chantra ◽  
Ling Loh ◽  
Brendan Burkart ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Mustefa Jibril

The main aim of this study was to assess problem solving performance in physics of grade 9th students. A test of reasoning was administered to a sample of 578 students. The results show differential performance of the students. Question based performance with background variable as school sector shows that performance of private school students was significantly better than students of public schools. Similarly female private school students performed well than male private school students.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mariko Furukawa ◽  
Kosuke Nakanishi ◽  
Atsushi Honma ◽  
Koh‐Ichi Takakura ◽  
Kazuyo Matsuyama ◽  
...  

Agro-Science ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 20 (2) ◽  
pp. 20-24
Author(s):  
A.L. Nassir ◽  
M.O. Olayiwola ◽  
S.O. Olagunju ◽  
K.M. Adewusi ◽  
S.S. Jinadu

Differential performance of genotypes in different cultivation environments has remained a challenge to farmers and plant breeders, the emphasis being the selection of high yielding and stable genotypes, across similar ecologies. A set of nine cowpea genotypes were  cultivated in Ago-Iwoye and Ayetoro, two locations representing high and moderate moisture zones. Plantings were done with the early and late season rains in Ago-Iwoye and mid-late season rains of Ayetoro. Statistical analysis was done to understand genotype reaction to the different environments and the plant and environment factors mediating the performance. The Additive Main Effect and Multiplicative Interaction (AMMI) model captured 61.30% of the total sum of squares (TSS). The main effects: genotype (G) environment (E) and their interaction (GxE) were significant with the largest contribution of 28.70% by the environment while the interaction and genotype fractionscaptured 20.20% and 12.40%, respectively. The percentage contribution of the main effects and GxE to total sum of squares (TSS) for traits was not consistent. The Genotype plus Genotype-by-Environment (GGE) analysis summarized 91.30% of the variation in genotype performance across environment. The cultivation environments were separated into two, with IT 95M 118 as the vertex genotype in the Ayetoro while TVU 8905 was the topmost genotype in Ago-Iwoye. The two genotypes recorded the highest grain weight per plant (GWPP) but were also the most unstable The stable genotypes IT 95M 120 and IT 86 D 716 flowered relatively late compared to others, are taller, had higher vegetative score and are low grain producers. Key words: AMMI, drought, GGE, stability, Vigna unguiculata


2021 ◽  
Vol 18 (179) ◽  
pp. 20210318
Author(s):  
Cristian L. Klunk ◽  
Marco A. Argenta ◽  
Alexandre Casadei-Ferreira ◽  
Evan P. Economo ◽  
Marcio R. Pie

Ants show remarkable ecological and evolutionary success due to their social life history and division of labour among colony members. In some lineages, the worker force became subdivided into morphologically distinct individuals (i.e. minor versus major workers), allowing for the differential performance of particular roles in the colony. However, the functional and ecological significance of these morphological differences are not well understood. Here, we applied finite element analysis (FEA) to explore the biomechanical differences between major and minor ant worker mandibles. Analyses were carried out on mandibles of two Pheidole species, a dimorphic ant genus. We tested whether major mandibles evolved to minimize stress when compared to minors using combinations of the apical tooth and masticatory margin bites under strike and pressure conditions. Majors performed better in pressure conditions yet, contrary to our expectations, minors performed better in strike bite scenarios. Moreover, we demonstrated that even small morphological differences in ant mandibles might lead to substantial differences in biomechanical responses to bite loading. These results also underscore the potential of FEA to uncover biomechanical consequences of morphological differences within and between ant workers.


Author(s):  
C.L. Klunk ◽  
M.A. Argenta ◽  
A. Casadei-Ferreira ◽  
E.P. Economo ◽  
M.R. Pie

AbstractThe remarkable ecological and evolutionary success of ants was associated with the evolution of reproductive division of labor, in which sterile workers perform most colony tasks whereas reproductives become specialized in reproduction. In some lineages, the worker force became further subdivided into morphologically distinct subcastes (e.g. minor vs. major workers), allowing for the differential performance of particular roles in the colony. However, the functional and ecological significance of morphological differences between subcastes is not well understood. Here, we applied Finite Element Analysis (FEA) to explore the functional differences between major and minor ant worker mandibles. Analyses were carried out on mandibles of two Pheidole species, a dimorphic ant genus. In particular, we test whether major mandibles evolved to minimize stress when compared to minors using combinations of tooth and masticatory margin bites under strike and pressure conditions. Majors performed better in pressure conditions yet, contrary to our expectations, minors performed better in strike bite scenarios. Moreover, we demonstrate that even small morphological differences in ant mandibles might lead to substantial differences in biomechanical responses to bite loading. These results also underscore the potential of FEA to uncover biomechanical consequences of morphological differences within and between ant worker castes.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document