activity modifiers
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

7
(FIVE YEARS 0)

H-INDEX

3
(FIVE YEARS 0)

2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ryan Walsh

The classical way of defining enzyme inhibition has obscured the distinction between inhibitory effect and the inhibitor binding constant. This article examines the relationship between the simple binding curve used to define biomolecular interactions and the standard inhibitory term (1+([I]/Ki)). By understanding how this term relates to binding curves which are ubiquitously used to describe biological processes, a modifier equation which distinguishes between inhibitor binding and the inhibitory effect, is examined. This modifier equation which can describe both activation and inhibition is compared to standard inhibitory equations with the development of global data fitting templates in Excel, and via the global fitting of these equations to previously reported enzyme kinetic data. This equation and the template developed in this article should prove to be useful tools in the study of enzyme inhibition and activation.


Author(s):  
Rigmor Austgulen ◽  
Egil Lien ◽  
Nina-Beate Liabakk ◽  
Geir Jacobsen ◽  
Knut Jørgen Arntzen

1984 ◽  
Vol 43 (2) ◽  
pp. 181-190 ◽  
Author(s):  
Craig S. Tepper ◽  
Anne L. Terry ◽  
James E. Holmes ◽  
Rollin C. Richmond

SUMMARYThe esterase 6 (Est-6) locus in Drosophila melanogaster is located on the third chromosome and is the structural gene for a carboxylesterase (E.C.3.1.1.1) and is polymorphic for two major electromorphs (slow and fast). Isogenic lines containing X chromosomes extracted from natural populations and substituted into a common genetic background were used to detect unlinked factors that affect the activity of the Est-6 locus. Twofold activity differences of esterase 6 (EST 6) were found among males from these derived lines, which differ only in their X chromosome. These unlinked activity modifiers identify possible regulatory elements. Immunoelectrophoresis was used to estimate quantitatively the levels of specific cross-reacting material in the derived lines. The results show that the variation in activity is due to differences in the amount of EST 6 present. The data are consistent with the hypothesis that there is at least one locus on the X chromosome that regulates the synthesis of EST 6 and that this regulatory locus may be polymorphic in natural populations.


Genetics ◽  
1984 ◽  
Vol 106 (4) ◽  
pp. 655-668
Author(s):  
Naohiko Miyashita ◽  
C C Laurie-Ahlberg

ABSTRACT By combining ten second and ten third chromosomes, we investigated chromosomal interaction with respect to the action of the modifier factors on G6PD and 6PGD activities in Drosophila melanogaster. Analysis of variance revealed that highly significant chromosomal interaction exists for both enzyme activities. From the estimated variance components, it was concluded that the variation in enzyme activity attributed to the intera ction is as great as the variation attributed to the second chromosome but less than attributed to the third chromosome. The interaction is not explained by the variation of body size (live weight). The interaction is generated from both the lack of correlation of second chromosomes for third chromosome backgrounds and the heterogeneous variance of second chromosomes for different third chromosome backgrounds. Large and constant correlation between G6PD and 6PGD activities were found for third chromosomes with any second chromosome background, whereas the correlations for second chromosomes were much smaller and varied considerably with the third chromosome background. This result suggests that the activity modifiers on the second chromosome are under the influence of third chromosome factors.


1975 ◽  
Vol 26 (1) ◽  
pp. 81-93 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. D. Ward

SUMMARYAlcohol dehydrogenase activity in Drosophila melanogaster may be considered as a quantitative character, since it shows many features typically associated with such traits. Although strains with the electrophoretically fast phenotype generally have activities greater than those with the slow phenotype, presumably reflecting differences in the nucleotide sequences of the structural alleles, within each electrophoretic class there is considerable variation in activity. The expression of the structural gene, in terms of ADH activity, is to some extent regulated by its genetic background. Strains homozygous for particular structural alleles respond to divergent directional selection for ADH activity. Modifiers have been located to the X, second and third chromosomes.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document