physician judgment
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

40
(FIVE YEARS 6)

H-INDEX

13
(FIVE YEARS 2)

TH Open ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 05 (03) ◽  
pp. e353-e362
Author(s):  
Jan Beyer-Westendorf ◽  
Matthew Fay ◽  
Walid Amara

AbstractPreventing thromboembolic events, while minimizing bleeding risks, remains challenging when managing patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). Several factors contribute to current dosing patterns of nonvitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs), including patient characteristics, comorbidities, and physician judgment. Application of NOAC doses inconsistent with the drug labels may cause patients to receive either subtherapeutic (increasing stroke risk) or supratherapeutic (increasing bleeding risk) anticoagulant levels. In clinical practice, under- or over-dosing of NOACs in patients with AF is not uncommon. This analysis of prospective and retrospective registry and database studies on NOAC use in patients with AF (with at least 250 patients in each treatment arm) showed that under-dosing may be associated with reduced effectiveness for stroke prevention, with similar or even increased bleeding than with the standard dose. This may reflect underlying conditions and patient factors that increase bleeding despite NOAC dose reduction. Such factors could drive the observed overuse of reduced NOAC dosages, often making the prescription of reduced-dose NOAC an intentional label deviation. In contrast, over-dosing more likely occurs accidentally; instead of providing benefits, it may be associated with worse safety outcomes than the standard dose, including increased bleeding risk and higher all-cause mortality rates. This review summarizes the main findings on NOAC doses usually prescribed to patients with AF in clinical practice.


2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (5) ◽  
pp. 947-952 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniel J. Henning ◽  
M. Kennedy Hall ◽  
Bjorn K. Watsjold ◽  
Pavan K. Bhatraju ◽  
Susanna Kosamo ◽  
...  

Shock ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol Publish Ahead of Print ◽  
Author(s):  
William R. Cleek ◽  
Nicholas J. Johnson ◽  
Bjorn K. Watsjold ◽  
M. Kennedy Hall ◽  
Daniel J. Henning

2019 ◽  
Vol 47 (11) ◽  
pp. 1513-1521 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniel J. Henning ◽  
Pavan K. Bhatraju ◽  
Nicholas J. Johnson ◽  
Susanna Kosamo ◽  
Nathan I. Shapiro ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 65 (10) ◽  
pp. 1601-1606 ◽  
Author(s):  
R Douglas Bruce ◽  
Jessica Merlin ◽  
Paula J Lum ◽  
Ebtesam Ahmed ◽  
Carla Alexander ◽  
...  

Abstract Pain has always been an important part of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) disease and its experience for patients. In this guideline, we review the types of chronic pain commonly seen among persons living with HIV (PLWH) and review the limited evidence base for treatment of chronic noncancer pain in this population. We also review the management of chronic pain in special populations of PLWH, including persons with substance use and mental health disorders. Finally, a general review of possible pharmacokinetic interactions is included to assist the HIV clinician in the treatment of chronic pain in this population. It is important to realize that guidelines cannot always account for individual variation among patients. They are not intended to supplant physician judgment with respect to particular patients or special clinical situations. The Infectious Diseases Society of American considers adherence to these guidelines to be voluntary, with the ultimate determination regarding their application to be made by the physician in the light of each patient’s individual circumstances.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document