sediment classification
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

96
(FIVE YEARS 25)

H-INDEX

11
(FIVE YEARS 3)

2021 ◽  
Vol 944 (1) ◽  
pp. 012022
Author(s):  
R Hartati ◽  
T S Alya ◽  
M Zainuri ◽  
A Ambariyanto ◽  
W Widianingsih ◽  
...  

Abstract Increasing demand for marine resources, such as sea cucumber, has led to widespread interest in their conservation, one of which is sea ranching. This study sought to identify habitat suitability for sea cucumber Holothuria scabra ranching. The proposed location was Sintok Island, one small island part of Karimunjawa Archipelagos. The HSI (Habitat Suitability Index) model was used to identify potential sites for sea cucumber ranching. Twelve habitat factors were used as input variables for the HSI model: sediment classification, water temperature, salinity, pH, dissolved oxygen, depth, transparency, current, depth, organic matter and chlorophyll-a of the sediment, seagrass density, and tide. The weighting of each habitat factor was defined through the Delphi method. Sediment classification and seagrass density were the most and less important condition affecting the HSI of H. scabra in the different study areas with weighing index of 0.2191 and 0.015 respectively. The HSI of Southern Station (Station 1) was relatively low (0.79-0.81), meaning the site was not suitable for sea ranching of H. scabra. In contrast, the western (Station 2) and the northern part (Station 3) of Sintok Island, were preferable sites, suitable as habitats for restoration efforts in sea ranching.


2021 ◽  
Vol 114 (sp1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Hyun Dong Kim ◽  
Shin-ich Aoki ◽  
Hyumin Oh ◽  
Kyu Han Kim ◽  
Juhye Oh

2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (5) ◽  
pp. 508
Author(s):  
Xiaochen Yu ◽  
Jingsheng Zhai ◽  
Bo Zou ◽  
Qi Shao ◽  
Guangchao Hou

The modern discrimination of sediment is based on acoustic intensity (backscatter) information from high-resolution multibeam echo-sounder systems (MBES). The backscattering intensity, varying with the angle of incidence, reveals the characteristics of seabed sediment. In this study, we propose a novel unsupervised acoustic sediment classification method based on the K-medoids algorithm using multibeam backscattering intensity data. In this method, we use the Lurton parameters model, which is the relationship between the backscattering intensity and incidence, to obtain the backscattering angle corresponding curve, and we use the genetic algorithm to fit the curve by the least-squares method. After extracting the four relevant parameters of the model when the ideal fitting effect was achieved, we input the characteristic parameters obtained from the fitting to the K-medoids clustering model. To validate the proposed classification method, we compare it with the self-organizing map (SOM) neural network classification method under the same parameter settings. The results of the experiment show that when the seabed sediment category is less than or equal to 3, the results of the K-medoids algorithm and the SOM neural network are approximately identical. As the sediment category increases, the SOM neural network shows instability, and it is impossible to see the clear boundaries of the seabed sediment, while the K-medoids category is 5 and the seabed sediment classification is correct. After comparing with field in situ seabed sediment sampling along the MBES survey line, the sediment classification method based on K-medoids is consistent with the distribution of the field sediment sampling. The classification accuracies for bedrock, sandy clay, and silty sand are all above 90%; those for gravel and clay are nearly 80%, and the overall accuracy reaches 89.7%.


2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (9) ◽  
pp. 1760
Author(s):  
Ting Zhao ◽  
Giacomo Montereale Gavazzi ◽  
Srđan Lazendić ◽  
Yuxin Zhao ◽  
Aleksandra Pižurica

The use of multibeam echosounder systems (MBES) for detailed seafloor mapping is increasing at a fast pace. Due to their design, enabling continuous high-density measurements and the coregistration of seafloor’s depth and reflectivity, MBES has become a fundamental instrument in the advancing field of acoustic seafloor classification (ASC). With these data becoming available, recent seafloor mapping research focuses on the interpretation of the hydroacoustic data and automated predictive modeling of seafloor composition. While a methodological consensus on which seafloor sediment classification algorithm and routine does not exist in the scientific community, it is expected that progress will occur through the refinement of each stage of the ASC pipeline: ranging from the data acquisition to the modeling phase. This research focuses on the stage of the feature extraction; the stage wherein the spatial variables used for the classification are, in this case, derived from the MBES backscatter data. This contribution explored the sediment classification potential of a textural feature based on the recently introduced Weyl transform of 300 kHz MBES backscatter imagery acquired over a nearshore study site in Belgian Waters. The goodness of the Weyl transform textural feature for seafloor sediment classification was assessed in terms of cluster separation of Folk’s sedimentological categories (4-class scheme). Class separation potential was quantified at multiple spatial scales by cluster silhouette coefficients. Weyl features derived from MBES backscatter data were found to exhibit superior thematic class separation compared to other well-established textural features, namely: (1) First-order Statistics, (2) Gray Level Co-occurrence Matrices (GLCM), (3) Wavelet Transform and (4) Local Binary Pattern (LBP). Finally, by employing a Random Forest (RF) categorical classifier, the value of the proposed textural feature for seafloor sediment mapping was confirmed in terms of global and by-class classification accuracies, highest for models based on the backscatter Weyl features. Further tests on different backscatter datasets and sediment classification schemes are required to further elucidate the use of the Weyl transform of MBES backscatter imagery in the context of seafloor mapping.


2021 ◽  
Vol 149 ◽  
pp. 104713
Author(s):  
Fengfan Wang ◽  
Jia Yu ◽  
Zhijie Liu ◽  
Min Kong ◽  
Yunfan Wu

2021 ◽  
Vol 432 ◽  
pp. 106390
Author(s):  
Xiaodong Cui ◽  
Fanlin Yang ◽  
Xin Wang ◽  
Bo Ai ◽  
Yu Luo ◽  
...  

IEEE Access ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 9 ◽  
pp. 29416-29428
Author(s):  
Xiaoming Qin ◽  
Xiaowen Luo ◽  
Ziyin Wu ◽  
Jihong Shang

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document