inflow boundary condition
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

29
(FIVE YEARS 6)

H-INDEX

9
(FIVE YEARS 1)

Author(s):  
L. Einkemmer ◽  
A. Ostermann ◽  
M. Residori

AbstractThe present work proposes a second-order time splitting scheme for a linear dispersive equation with a variable advection coefficient subject to transparent boundary conditions. For its spatial discretization, a dual Petrov–Galerkin method is considered which gives spectral accuracy. The main difficulty in constructing a second-order splitting scheme in such a situation lies in the compatibility condition at the boundaries of the sub-problems. In particular, the presence of an inflow boundary condition in the advection part results in order reduction. To overcome this issue a modified Strang splitting scheme is introduced that retains second-order accuracy. For this numerical scheme a stability analysis is conducted. In addition, numerical results are shown to support the theoretical derivations.


Metals ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (8) ◽  
pp. 1297
Author(s):  
Yannan Wang ◽  
Lingling Cao ◽  
Zhongfu Cheng ◽  
Bart Blanpain ◽  
Muxing Guo

This paper focusses on three main numerical methods, i.e., the Reynolds-Averaged Navier-Stokes (RANS), Large Eddy Simulation (LES), and Direct Numerical Simulation (DNS) methods. The formulation and variation of different RANS methods are evaluated. The advantage and disadvantage of RANS models to characterize turbulent flows are discussed. The progress of LES with different subgrid scale models is presented. Special attention is paid to the inflow boundary condition for LES modelling. Application and limitation of the DNS model are described. Different experimental techniques for model validation are given. The consistency between physical experimentation/modelling and industrial cases is discussed. An emphasis is placed on the model validation through physical experimentation. Subsequently, the application of a turbulence model for three specific flow problems commonly encountered in metallurgical process, i.e., bubble-induced turbulence, supersonic jet transport, and electromagnetic suppression of turbulence, is discussed. Some future perspectives for the simulation of turbulent flow are formulated.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gabriel B. Goodwin ◽  
Christian L. Bachman ◽  
Ryan F. Johnson ◽  
David A. Kessler

2016 ◽  
Vol 2016 (0) ◽  
pp. J0240201
Author(s):  
Takashi SAKAMOTO ◽  
Shun SHIMIZU ◽  
Shinya KIMURA ◽  
Gaku TANAKA ◽  
Toshihiro SERA ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document