iron electrodes
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

274
(FIVE YEARS 43)

H-INDEX

38
(FIVE YEARS 5)

FLUIDA ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 14 (2) ◽  
pp. 65-72
Author(s):  
Rifki Ardiansyah ◽  
Triyoga Meiditama Putra ◽  
Dian Ratna Suminar ◽  
Agustinus Ngatin

ABSTRAK Salah satu upaya untuk menjaga persediaan air yaitu dengan cara menurunkan parameter air laut agar memenuhi parameter air tawar menggunakan metode elektrokoagulasi. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mempelajari pengaruh waktu proses elektrokoagulasi terhadap penurunan TDS, kekeruhan, kadar Cl, dan kadar Fe. Selain itu, untuk mengetahui perbandingan antara elektroda Al dan Fe. Air laut diambil dari Pantai Pelabuhan Ratu. Elektroda yang digunakan adalah Al dan Fe dengan ukuran 15x10 cm2. Tegangan yang digunakan yaitu 5 volt atau rapat arus sebesar 0,137 A/dm2 dengan waktu proses 15, 30, 45, dan 60 menit serta volume bahan bakunya 4 Liter. Penelitian dengan waktu proses 30 menit dan proses pengendapan selama satu hari mampu menurunkan kekeruhan hingga 2,28 NTU (55,07%); TDS hingga 1.010 mg/L (3,71%); kadar Cl hingga 271,98 mg/L (3,52%); dan kadar Fe 0,05 mg/L (40,65%). Proses elektrokoagulasi menggunakan elektroda aluminium lebih baik dibandingkan elektroda besi pada waktu proses 30 menit.   ABSTRACT One of the efforts to maintain water supply is by lowering seawater parameters to meet freshwater parameters using the electrocoagulation method. This study aims to study the effect of electrocoagulation process time on the decrease in TDS, turbidity, Cl content, and Fe content. In addition, to determine the comparison between Al and Fe electrodes. Seawater is taken from Pelabuhan Ratu Beach. The electrodes used are Al and Fe with a size of 15x10 cm2. The voltage used is 5 volts or a current density of 0,137 A/dm2 with processing times of 15, 30, 45, and 60 minutes and the volume of the raw material is 4 liters. Research with a processing time of 30 minutes and sedimentation for one day was able to reduce turbidity up to 2,28 NTU (55,07%); TDS up to 1.010 mg/L (3,71%); Cl content up to 271,98 mg/L (3,52%); and Fe content of 0,05 mg/L (40,65%). The electrocoagulation process using aluminum electrodes was better than iron electrodes at a processing time of 30 minutes.


Author(s):  
Minghui Feng ◽  
Alice L. Dauphin ◽  
Laurent Bouffier ◽  
Feifei Zhang ◽  
Zonghua Wang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  

ACS Omega ◽  
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tran Van Cong ◽  
Nguyen Duc Hung ◽  
Ngoc Dung Tran Thi ◽  
Nguyen Van Hoang ◽  
Surya Veerendra Prabhakar Vattikuti ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (3) ◽  
pp. 105223
Author(s):  
Thiago Castanho Pereira ◽  
Everton Fernando Zanoelo ◽  
Fernando Hermes Passig ◽  
Cristina Benincá ◽  
Karina Querne de Carvalho

Expulsion of toxins from distillery spent wash (DSW) was applied by utilizing a blend of matched aluminum and iron electrodes in a clump method of activity utilizing electrochemical procedure. The refinery spent wash was described diagnostically utilizing standard strategy for examination and the treatment results were dissected as far as COD and Colour. The examinations were directed to consider the impact of working boundaries, for example, voltage, separation between the electrodes and electrolysis time and were optimized by utilizing Taguchi and ANOVA technique. pH and stirring speed were kept constant as 7 and 500 rpm. The most extreme expulsion efficiencies of COD and Colour were monitored by considering total of 16 experiments each with three trials. The Taguchi method led to COD of 95% and color removal of 94%, optimized with Al-Al electrodes at the voltage of 25V, distance of electrodes 2 cm and the electrolysis time of 150 minutes. The most extreme COD and Colour removal efficiencies found to be 92% and 89% from Fe-Fe electrodes at the indistinguishable working conditions. In any case, the aluminum electrodes seen progressively appropriate for the deprivation of DSW when contrasted with iron electrodes.


2021 ◽  
Vol 168 (3) ◽  
pp. 030518
Author(s):  
D. Mitra ◽  
A. Sundar Rajan ◽  
Ahamed Irshad ◽  
S. R. Narayanan

2021 ◽  
Vol 213 ◽  
pp. 259-268
Author(s):  
Mostafa Mamdouh ◽  
Safwat M. Safwat ◽  
Hisham Abd-Elhalim ◽  
Ehab Rozaik

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document