canopy uptake
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

19
(FIVE YEARS 2)

H-INDEX

10
(FIVE YEARS 0)

2017 ◽  
Vol 17 (18) ◽  
pp. 11453-11465 ◽  
Author(s):  
Linda M. J. Kooijmans ◽  
Kadmiel Maseyk ◽  
Ulli Seibt ◽  
Wu Sun ◽  
Timo Vesala ◽  
...  

Abstract. Nighttime vegetative uptake of carbonyl sulfide (COS) can exist due to the incomplete closure of stomata and the light independence of the enzyme carbonic anhydrase, which complicates the use of COS as a tracer for gross primary productivity (GPP). In this study we derived nighttime COS fluxes in a boreal forest (the SMEAR II station in Hyytiälä, Finland; 61°51′ N, 24°17′ E; 181 m a.s.l.) from June to November 2015 using two different methods: eddy-covariance (EC) measurements (FCOS-EC) and the radon-tracer method (FCOS-Rn). The total nighttime COS fluxes averaged over the whole measurement period were −6.8 ± 2.2 and −7.9 ± 3.8 pmol m−2 s−1 for FCOS-Rn and FCOS-EC, respectively, which is 33–38 % of the average daytime fluxes and 21 % of the total daily COS uptake. The correlation of 222Rn (of which the source is the soil) with COS (average R2  =  0.58) was lower than with CO2 (0.70), suggesting that the main sink of COS is not located at the ground. These observations are supported by soil chamber measurements that show that soil contributes to only 34–40 % of the total nighttime COS uptake. We found a decrease in COS uptake with decreasing nighttime stomatal conductance and increasing vapor-pressure deficit and air temperature, driven by stomatal closure in response to a warm and dry period in August. We also discuss the effect that canopy layer mixing can have on the radon-tracer method and the sensitivity of (FCOS-EC) to atmospheric turbulence. Our results suggest that the nighttime uptake of COS is mainly driven by the tree foliage and is significant in a boreal forest, such that it needs to be taken into account when using COS as a tracer for GPP.


2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Linda M. J. Kooijmans ◽  
Kadmiel Maseyk ◽  
Ulli Seibt ◽  
Wu Sun ◽  
Timo Vesala ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Linda M. J. Kooijmans ◽  
Kadmiel Maseyk ◽  
Ulli Seibt ◽  
Wu Sun ◽  
Timo Vesala ◽  
...  

Abstract. Nighttime vegetative uptake of carbonyl sulfide (COS) can exist due to the incomplete closure of stomata and the light-independence of the enzyme carbonic anhydrase, which complicates the use of COS as a tracer for gross primary productivity (GPP). In this study we derived nighttime COS fluxes in a boreal forest (the SMEAR II station in Hyytiälä, Finland; 61°51′ N, 24°17′ E, 181 m ASL) from June to November 2015 using two different methods: eddy-covariance (EC) measurements (FCOS-EC) and the radon-tracer method (FCOS-Rn). The nighttime COS fluxes averaged over the whole measurement period were −8.1 ± 1.5 and −7.9 ± 3.8 pmol m−2 s−1 for FCOS-Rn and FCOS-EC, respectively, which is 38 % of the average daytime fluxes and 21 % of the total daily COS uptake. The correlation of 222Radon (of which the source is the soil) with COS (average R2 = 0.59) was lower than with CO2 (0.79), suggesting that the main sink of COS is not located at the ground. These observations are supported by soil chamber measurements that show that soil contributes to only 33 % of the total nighttime COS uptake. We found a decrease of COS uptake with decreasing night-time stomatal conductance and increasing VPD and air temperature, driven by stomatal closure in response to a warm and dry period in August. We also discuss the effect that canopy layer mixing can have on the radon-tracer method and the sensitivity of FCOS-EC to atmospheric turbulence. Our results suggest that the nighttime uptake of COS is mainly driven by the tree foliage and is significant in a boreal forest, such that it needs to be taken into account when using COS as a tracer for GPP.


2017 ◽  
Vol 152 ◽  
pp. 191-200 ◽  
Author(s):  
L. Aguillaume ◽  
S. Izquieta-Rojano ◽  
H. García-Gómez ◽  
D. Elustondo ◽  
J.M. Santamaría ◽  
...  

2013 ◽  
Vol 445-446 ◽  
pp. 356-364 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stéphane Guédron ◽  
Sylvain Grangeon ◽  
Glorianne Jouravel ◽  
Laurent Charlet ◽  
Géraldine Sarret

2012 ◽  
Vol 223 (9) ◽  
pp. 5643-5657 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sandy Adriaenssens ◽  
Jeroen Staelens ◽  
Karen Wuyts ◽  
Shari Van Wittenberghe ◽  
Tatiana Wuytack ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document