1160 LEARN (Urological Teaching in British Medical Schools Nationally): A Multicentre Cross-Sectional Study

Introduction Urology is a common rotation for UK Foundation Year (FY) doctors, and accounts for >25% of acute surgical referrals. In 2012, the British Association of Urological Surgeons (BAUS) produced ‘An Undergraduate Syllabus for Urology’, advising on common clinical areas of urology to be covered during medical school. However, its national uptake remains unknown. LEARN aims to assess undergraduate urology teaching across UK medical schools. Method LEARN is the largest ever multicentre cross-sectional study of undergraduate urology teaching. Year 2-5 medical students and FY1 doctors were invited to complete a survey between 3rd October-20th December 2020. The primary objective is to compare current undergraduate urology teaching against the BAUS syllabus. Secondary objectives investigate the type and quantity of teaching provided, the reported performance rate of GMC mandated urological procedures, and the proportion of those considering urology as a career. Results A total of 7,611/8,346 (91.2%) responses from 39 medical schools that met the inclusion criteria were analysed. 16.5% of responses were newly appointed FY1 doctors. In their undergraduate training, the most commonly taught topics were urinary tract infection, acute kidney injury and haematuria; the least taught topics were male urinary incontinence, male infertility and erectile dysfunction. 90.6% and 86.3% had reported performing catheterisation as undergraduates on male and female patients respectively, and 16.9% had considered a career in urology. Conclusion LEARN provides the largest evaluation of any undergraduate specialty teaching. It has identified areas to improve teaching, to equip the future workforce with the competencies to manage urological pathology, irrespective of future career choice.

Addressing the gender gap in urinary continence care

Urinary incontinence is a common condition that affects both men and women, and with profoundly negative effects. Prevalence figures do show that it is more common in younger women than men, but as people age the difference decreases, with research identifying that one in three older men have continence issues. However, even with this increase, there is little direct best practice guidance on addressing male urinary incontinence compared to that for women. Professionals seem to be unaware that men have known existing barriers to accessing health care and this would be especially true of such an embarrassing condition. There seems to be a lack of education in identifying symptoms and assessing and little thought to appropriate management if required. This can also be true of manufacturers that provide continence management equipment. This article will look at some of these themes and highlight the gender gaps and give guidance on how professionals may address these.

Urethral Inserts for the Management of Adult Male Urinary Incontinence

No evidence was identified regarding the clinical effectiveness of male urethral inserts for the management of male urinary incontinence. No evidence was identified regarding the cost-effectiveness of male urethral inserts for the management of male urinary incontinence.