eulemur rufifrons
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

14
(FIVE YEARS 4)

H-INDEX

5
(FIVE YEARS 1)

2020 ◽  
Vol 101 (2) ◽  
pp. 574-581 ◽  
Author(s):  
Caroline R Amoroso ◽  
Peter M Kappeler ◽  
Claudia Fichtel ◽  
Charles L Nunn

Abstract Animals that depend on water sources in dry environments must balance their water demands with predation risk. In settings of water scarcity, predators may strategically exploit prey’s dependence on water; prey may adjust their use of water sources either spatially or temporally to avoid overlapping with predators. To examine the spatiotemporal dynamics of predators and prey at water sources, we studied the use of semipermanent waterholes in the dry season by red-fronted lemurs (Eulemur rufifrons), a primate species that exhibits flexible circadian activity patterns and inhabits a dry deciduous forest in western Madagascar. We hypothesized that lemurs avoid predators in their spatiotemporal use of waterholes. We analyzed the patterns of camera trap activations at waterholes by red-fronted lemurs and their two main predators: fossa (Cryptoprocta ferox) and Madagascar harrier hawks (Polyboroides radiatus). We found that red-fronted lemurs were unlikely to use waterholes at times of day when predators were commonly present, and that the distributions of times of waterhole use differed between red-fronted lemurs and each of their predator species. Red-fronted lemurs frequently used waterholes that were also used by predators within the same week in part because the predators used a variable set of water resources. In this system, predators did not appear to exploit waterholes for the high density of red-fronted lemurs attracted to them, but instead likely used waterholes primarily to meet their own water demands. Our findings suggest that when predators and prey share water sources, prey may adjust their behavior to reduce their risk of overlap with predators, including through avoidance of indirect cues of predation, such as waterholes at particular times of day.


2020 ◽  
Vol 41 (1) ◽  
pp. 61-80
Author(s):  
Caroline R. Amoroso ◽  
Peter M. Kappeler ◽  
Claudia Fichtel ◽  
Charles L. Nunn

2019 ◽  
Vol 6 (3) ◽  
pp. 180991 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anna Lucia Sperber ◽  
Peter M. Kappeler ◽  
Claudia Fichtel

Collective movements are essential for maintaining group cohesion. However, group members can have different optimal departure times, depending on individual, social and contextual factors whose relative importance remains poorly known. We, therefore, studied collective departures in four groups of red-fronted lemurs ( Eulemur rufifrons ) in Kirindy Forest, Madagascar, to investigate the influence of an individual's age, sex, their affiliative relationships and their proximity to other group members at the time of departure on their individual departure decision. We recorded behavioural and spatial data on individual departures during 167 group movements and conducted group scans (181–279 per group) to assess affiliative relationships. All factors influenced individual departures. Both affiliation and proximity determined a mimetic joining process in which dyads with stronger affiliative bonds departed in closer succession, and individuals followed the initiator and predecessors more quickly when they were in closer proximity at departure. While the influence of affiliation is common, the effect of inter-individual distance has rarely been considered in groups with heterogeneous social relationships. Although local rules influenced joining, the overall movement pattern was mainly determined by individual traits: juveniles took protected central positions, while females made up the van and males brought up the rear. Individual needs, expressed in the departure order, to an extent overruled the effect of affiliation. These results highlight the importance of considering individual, social and contextual factors collectively in the study of collective movements.


2016 ◽  
Vol 16 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Hanitriniaina Rakotonirina ◽  
Peter M. Kappeler ◽  
Claudia Fichtel

2015 ◽  
Vol 18 (3) ◽  
pp. 777-787 ◽  
Author(s):  
Franziska Huebner ◽  
Claudia Fichtel

2013 ◽  
Vol 153 (1) ◽  
pp. 61-67 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anna V. Schnoell ◽  
Franziska Huebner ◽  
Peter M. Kappeler ◽  
Claudia Fichtel

Primates ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 54 (4) ◽  
pp. 371-375 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anna Viktoria Schnoell ◽  
Claudia Fichtel

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document