duodenal adenomatosis
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

24
(FIVE YEARS 3)

H-INDEX

9
(FIVE YEARS 0)

2019 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
pp. e000336
Author(s):  
Peter L Labib ◽  
George Goodchild ◽  
James P Turbett ◽  
James Skipworth ◽  
Arjun Shankar ◽  
...  

ObjectiveCurrent surveillance strategies for duodenal adenomatosis in familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP) miss malignancies and underestimate cancer risk in ampullary disease. This study aimed to evaluate the utility of endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) in the assessment of FAP patients with duodenal and/or ampullary polyposis referred for surgical intervention.DesignA retrospective analysis of FAP patients undergoing index EUS between December 2006 and May 2015 was performed. Follow-up was completed in January 2018, including review of all EUS procedures and surgical interventions (median follow-up 6 years).ResultsFifty-five patients underwent 188 EUS procedures. Six patients (11%) developed malignancy (three duodenal, three ampullary). Ampullary cancer risk was underestimated by Spigelman stage and overestimated by Kashiwagi classification. Ultrasound findings were poor predictors of malignancy, with common bile duct dilatation being the only finding present in one EUS prior to a diagnosis of ampullary cancer. The best predictors of ampullary malignancy were an ampullary polyp size >3 cm and an increase >1 cm in ampullary polyp size. Ampullary polyp size >3 cm provided the best predictive value, correctly identifying two of the three cases of ampullary cancer and both patients with high-grade dysplasia. EUS biopsy failed to detect malignancy later confirmed by surgical histology in two patients.ConclusionEUS surveillance confers little additional benefit to standard endoscopic surveillance in FAP patients. The best predictor of ampullary malignancy is an ampullary polyp >3 cm; this could be regarded as a relative indication for surgery.


2017 ◽  
Vol 403 (1) ◽  
pp. 93-102 ◽  
Author(s):  
Petra Ganschow ◽  
Thilo Hackert ◽  
Marcel Biegler ◽  
Pietro Contin ◽  
Ulf Hinz ◽  
...  

2014 ◽  
Vol 26 ◽  
pp. 30-34 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yuji Maehata ◽  
Motohiro Esaki ◽  
Minako Hirahashi ◽  
Takanari Kitazono ◽  
Takayuki Matsumoto

Surgery ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 151 (5) ◽  
pp. 681-690 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bjorn W.H. van Heumen ◽  
Marry H. Nieuwenhuis ◽  
Harry van Goor ◽  
Lisbeth (E) M.H. Mathus-Vliegen ◽  
Evelien Dekker ◽  
...  

Pancreatology ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 12 (3) ◽  
pp. e14
Author(s):  
J.R.A. Skipworth ◽  
S. Bannoo ◽  
A. Shankar ◽  
S. Clark ◽  
G.J. Webster ◽  
...  

2011 ◽  
Vol 11 (2) ◽  
pp. 167-173 ◽  
Author(s):  
Musa Drini ◽  
Anthony Speer ◽  
Christopher Dow ◽  
Neil Collier ◽  
Prithi Bhathal ◽  
...  

2011 ◽  
Vol 10 (3) ◽  
pp. 491-499 ◽  
Author(s):  
Elisabeth M. H. Mathus-Vliegen ◽  
Karam S. Boparai ◽  
Evelien Dekker ◽  
Nan van Geloven

2010 ◽  
Vol 71 (5) ◽  
pp. AB369-AB370 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jiri Cyrany ◽  
Stanislav Rejchrt ◽  
Marcela Kopacova ◽  
Vera Tycova ◽  
Jan Bures

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document